Okahara Shuji, Shimizu Kazuyoshi, Suzuki Satoshi, Ishii Kenzo, Morimatsu Hiroshi
Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Department of Anesthesiology and Oncological Pain Medicine, Fukuyama City Hospital, 5-23-1, Zaocho, Fukuyama-shi, Hiroshima, 721-8511, Japan.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0476-x.
The interest in perioperative lung protective ventilation has been increasing. However, optimal management during one-lung ventilation (OLV) remains undetermined, which not only includes tidal volume (V) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) but also inspired oxygen fraction (FO). We aimed to investigate current practice of intraoperative ventilation during OLV, and analyze whether the intraoperative ventilator settings are associated with postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after thoracic surgery.
We performed a prospective observational two-center study in Japan. Patients scheduled for thoracic surgery with OLV from April to October 2014 were eligible. We recorded ventilator settings (FO, V, driving pressure (ΔP), and PEEP) and calculated the time-weighted average (TWA) of ventilator settings for the first 2 h of OLV. PPCs occurring within 7 days of thoracotomy were investigated. Associations between ventilator settings and the incidence of PPCs were examined by multivariate logistic regression.
We analyzed perioperative information, including preoperative characteristics, ventilator settings, and details of surgery and anesthesia in 197 patients. Pressure control ventilation was utilized in most cases (92%). As an initial setting for OLV, an FO of 1.0 was selected for more than 60% of all patients. Throughout OLV, the median TWA FO of 0.8 (0.65-0.94), V of 6.1 (5.3-7.0) ml/kg, ΔP of 17 (15-20) cm HO, and PEEP of 4 (4-5) cm HO was applied. Incidence rate of PPCs was 25.9%, and FO was independently associated with the occurrence of PPCs in multivariate logistic regression. The adjusted odds ratio per FO increase of 0.1 was 1.30 (95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.65, P = 0.0195).
High FO was applied to the majority of patients during OLV, whereas low V and slight degree of PEEP were commonly used in our survey. Our findings suggested that a higher FO during OLV could be associated with increased incidence of PPCs.
围手术期肺保护性通气的关注度一直在增加。然而,单肺通气(OLV)期间的最佳管理仍未确定,这不仅包括潮气量(V)和呼气末正压(PEEP),还包括吸入氧分数(FO)。我们旨在调查OLV期间术中通气的当前实践,并分析术中呼吸机设置是否与胸外科手术后的肺部并发症(PPCs)相关。
我们在日本进行了一项前瞻性观察性双中心研究。计划在2014年4月至10月进行OLV胸外科手术的患者符合条件。我们记录了呼吸机设置(FO、V、驱动压(ΔP)和PEEP),并计算了OLV前2小时呼吸机设置的时间加权平均值(TWA)。调查了开胸术后7天内发生的PPCs。通过多因素逻辑回归分析呼吸机设置与PPCs发生率之间的关联。
我们分析了197例患者的围手术期信息,包括术前特征、呼吸机设置以及手术和麻醉细节。大多数情况下采用压力控制通气(92%)。作为OLV的初始设置,超过60%的患者选择FO为1.0。在整个OLV期间,应用的TWA中位数FO为0.8(0.65 - 0.94),V为6.1(5.3 - 7.0)ml/kg,ΔP为17(15 - 20)cmH₂O,PEEP为4(4 - 5)cmH₂O。PPCs的发生率为25.9%,在多因素逻辑回归中,FO与PPCs的发生独立相关。FO每增加0.1的调整优势比为1.30(95%置信区间:1.04 - 1.65,P = 0.0195)。
在OLV期间,大多数患者应用了高FO,而在我们的调查中,低V和轻度PEEP是常用的。我们的研究结果表明OLV期间较高的FO可能与PPCs发生率增加有关。