Suppr超能文献

一项关于热生物反馈以及热生物反馈联合认知疗法治疗血管性头痛的对照评估。

A controlled evaluation of thermal biofeedback and thermal biofeedback combined with cognitive therapy in the treatment of vascular headache.

作者信息

Blanchard E B, Appelbaum K A, Radnitz C L, Morrill B, Michultka D, Kirsch C, Guarnieri P, Hillhouse J, Evans D D, Jaccard J

机构信息

Center for Stress and Anxiety Disorders, State University of New York, Albany 12203.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990 Apr;58(2):216-24. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.58.2.216.

Abstract

One-hundred-sixteen patients suffering from vascular headache (migraine or combined migraine and tension) were, after 4 weeks of pretreatment baseline headache monitoring, randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (a) thermal biofeedback with adjunctive relaxation training (TBF); (b) TBF plus cognitive therapy; (c) pseudomediation as an ostensible attention-placebo control; or (d) headache monitoring. The first three groups received 16 individual sessions over 8 weeks, while the fourth group continued to monitor headaches. All groups then monitored headaches for a 4-week posttreatment baseline. Analyses revealed that all treated groups improved significantly more than the headache monitoring group with no significant differences among the three treated groups. On a measure of clinically significant improvement, the two TBF groups had slightly higher (51%) degree of improvement than the meditation group (37.5%). It is argued that the attention-placebo control became an active relaxation condition.

摘要

116名患有血管性头痛(偏头痛或偏头痛与紧张性头痛合并)的患者,在经过4周的预处理基线头痛监测后,被随机分配到以下四种情况之一:(a)热生物反馈辅助放松训练(TBF);(b)TBF加认知疗法;(c)作为表面上的注意力安慰剂对照的假干预;或(d)头痛监测。前三组在8周内接受16次个体治疗,而第四组继续监测头痛情况。所有组随后在治疗后进行4周的基线头痛监测。分析表明,所有治疗组的改善均显著超过头痛监测组,而三个治疗组之间无显著差异。在临床显著改善的衡量标准上,两个TBF组的改善程度(51%)略高于冥想组(37.5%)。有人认为,注意力安慰剂对照变成了一种积极的放松状态。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验