Suppr超能文献

血清胱抑素 C 与血清肌酐在评估菊粉清除率所测肾小球滤过率中的应用比较。

Performance of serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine as a marker of glomerular filtration rate as measured by inulin renal clearance.

机构信息

Department of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Exp Nephrol. 2011 Dec;15(6):868-76. doi: 10.1007/s10157-011-0525-y. Epub 2011 Aug 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Serum cystatin C was recently proposed as an alternative marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), with a suggested better performance than creatinine. However, detailed studies are limited. We evaluated the performance of cystatin C as a GFR marker.

METHODS

GFR was measured by inulin clearance in 763 Japanese subjects. Factors other than GFR influencing serum cystatin C or serum creatinine were analyzed by multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

After adjustment for GFR, the value of serum creatinine was 25.2% lower in females than males, and decreased by 5.2% for every 20 years of age. Serum cystatin C was 8.2% lower in females, and did not change significantly with aging. Creatinine but not cystatin C was significantly affected by body weight, height and body mass index after adjustment for GFR, gender and age. The correlation coefficient between GFR and 1/cystatin C was significantly higher than that of 1/creatinine in total subjects (0.866 and 0.810, respectively, p < 0.001). Unlike serum creatinine, serum cystatin C did not increase in association with the reduction of GFR in subjects with very low GFR. The regression line of 1/cystatin C against GFR showed a significantly negative intercept of about -8 ml/min/1.73 m(2).

CONCLUSION

The performance of serum cystatin C was not good in the subjects with very low GFR. Non-renal elimination of cystatin C may contribute to the result. The correlation between reciprocal cystatin C and GFR suggested its superiority in predicting GFR compared to creatinine in subjects with normal and mildly reduced GFR.

摘要

简介

血清胱抑素 C 最近被提议作为肾小球滤过率 (GFR) 的替代标志物,其表现优于肌酐。然而,详细的研究是有限的。我们评估了胱抑素 C 作为 GFR 标志物的性能。

方法

在 763 名日本受试者中通过菊粉清除率测量 GFR。通过多元分析分析了除 GFR 以外影响血清胱抑素 C 或血清肌酐的因素。

结果

调整 GFR 后,女性血清肌酐值比男性低 25.2%,每增加 20 岁年龄降低 5.2%。女性血清胱抑素 C 降低 8.2%,与年龄变化无明显相关性。调整 GFR、性别和年龄后,肌酐而非胱抑素 C 显著受体重、身高和体重指数的影响。在所有受试者中,GFR 与 1/胱抑素 C 的相关系数明显高于 1/肌酐(分别为 0.866 和 0.810,均<0.001)。与血清肌酐不同,在 GFR 非常低的受试者中,血清胱抑素 C 不会随着 GFR 的降低而增加。1/胱抑素 C 对 GFR 的回归线显示出约 -8 ml/min/1.73 m²的显著负截距。

结论

在 GFR 非常低的受试者中,血清胱抑素 C 的性能不佳。胱抑素 C 的非肾脏清除可能导致了这一结果。1/胱抑素 C 与 GFR 之间的相关性表明,与肌酐相比,它在 GFR 正常和轻度降低的受试者中具有更好的预测 GFR 的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验