University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;24(1):148-58. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00125. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
Although the co-occurrence of negative affect and pain is well recognized, the mechanism underlying their association is unclear. To examine whether a common self-regulatory ability impacts the experience of both emotion and pain, we integrated neuroimaging, behavioral, and physiological measures obtained from three assessments separated by substantial temporal intervals. Our results demonstrated that individual differences in emotion regulation ability, as indexed by an objective measure of emotional state, corrugator electromyography, predicted self-reported success while regulating pain. In both emotion and pain paradigms, the amygdala reflected regulatory success. Notably, we found that greater emotion regulation success was associated with greater change of amygdalar activity following pain regulation. Furthermore, individual differences in degree of amygdalar change following emotion regulation were a strong predictor of pain regulation success, as well as of the degree of amygdalar engagement following pain regulation. These findings suggest that common individual differences in emotion and pain regulatory success are reflected in a neural structure known to contribute to appraisal processes.
尽管负面情绪和疼痛的同时出现是众所周知的,但它们之间关联的机制尚不清楚。为了研究共同的自我调节能力是否会影响情绪和疼痛的体验,我们整合了三个评估间隔较长时间的神经影像学、行为和生理测量结果。我们的研究结果表明,情绪调节能力的个体差异,由情绪状态的客观测量指标——皱眉肌肌电图来表示,预测了自我报告的疼痛调节成功。在情绪和疼痛范式中,杏仁核反映了调节的成功。值得注意的是,我们发现,在疼痛调节后,情绪调节成功程度越高,杏仁核的活动变化越大。此外,在情绪调节后杏仁核变化的个体差异程度是疼痛调节成功的一个强有力的预测指标,也是疼痛调节后杏仁核参与程度的一个强有力的预测指标。这些发现表明,情绪和疼痛调节成功的个体差异反映在一个已知对评估过程有贡献的神经结构中。