Department of Chemistry and CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2011 Nov;74(8):2225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.08.011. Epub 2011 Aug 21.
The integration of bioaccumulation and effect biomarkers in fish has been proposed for risk evaluation of aquatic contaminants. However, this approach is still uncommon, namely in the context of mercury contamination. Furthermore, a multi-organ evaluation allows an overall account of the organisms' condition. Having in mind the organs' role on metal toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics, gills, liver and kidney of golden grey mullet (Liza aurata) were selected and mercury accumulation, antioxidant responses and peroxidative damage were assessed. Two critical locations in terms of mercury occurrence were selected from an impacted area of the Ria de Aveiro, Portugal (L1, L2), and compared with a reference area. Although kidney was the organ with the highest mercury load, only gills and liver were able to distinguish mercury accumulation between reference (R) and contaminated stations. Each organ demonstrated different mercury burdens, whereas antioxidant responses followed similar patterns. Liver and kidney showed an adaptive capacity to the intermediate degree of contamination/accumulation (L1) depicted in a catalase activity increase. In contrast, none of the antioxidants was induced under higher contamination/accumulation (L2) in any organ, with the exception of renal GST. The lack of lipid peroxidation increase observed in the three organs denunciates the existence of an efficient antioxidant system. However, the evidences of limitations on antioxidants performance at L2 cannot be overlooked as an indication of mercury-induced toxicity. Having in mind the responses of the three organs, CAT revealed to be the most suitable parameter for identifying mercury exposure in the field. Overall, organ-specific mercury burdens were unable to distinguish the intermediate degree of contamination, while antioxidant responses revealed limitations on signalizing the worst scenario, reinforcing the need to their combined use.
生物蓄积和效应生物标志物的整合已被提议用于水生污染物的风险评估。然而,这种方法在汞污染的情况下仍然不常见。此外,多器官评估可以全面了解生物体的状况。考虑到器官在金属毒物动力学和毒理学中的作用,选择了金灰色鲻鱼(Liza aurata)的鳃、肝和肾,并评估了汞积累、抗氧化反应和过氧化损伤。从葡萄牙阿威罗河口的一个受影响地区(L1、L2)选择了两个与汞发生有关的关键位置,并与参考区进行了比较。尽管肾脏是汞负荷最高的器官,但只有鳃和肝脏能够区分参考区(R)和污染区之间的汞积累。每个器官都表现出不同的汞负担,而抗氧化反应则遵循相似的模式。肝和肾表现出对中等程度污染/积累(L1)的适应能力,表现为过氧化氢酶活性增加。相比之下,在任何器官中,在更高的污染/积累(L2)下,都没有诱导任何抗氧化剂,除了肾脏 GST。在三个器官中都没有观察到脂质过氧化增加,这表明存在有效的抗氧化系统。然而,不能忽视在 L2 下抗氧化剂性能存在限制的证据,因为这表明存在汞诱导的毒性。考虑到三个器官的反应,CAT 被证明是识别现场汞暴露的最适用参数。总的来说,器官特异性的汞负担无法区分中等程度的污染,而抗氧化反应则显示出在指示最坏情况方面的局限性,这加强了需要联合使用它们。