Aarhus University, Centre of Medical Education, Brendstrupgaardsvej 102, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012 Mar;16(2):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
Visual expertise relies on perceptive as well as cognitive processes. At present, knowledge of these processes when diagnosing clinical cases mainly stems from studies with still pictures. In contrast, patient video cases constitute a dynamic diagnostic challenge that may simulate seeing and diagnosing a patient in person.
This study investigates visual attention and the concomitant cognitive processes of clinicians diagnosing authentic paediatric video cases.
A total of 43 clinicians with varying levels of expertise took part in this cross-sectional study. They diagnosed four brief video recordings of children: two with seizures and two with disorders imitating seizures. We used eye tracking to investigate time looking at relevant areas in the video cases and a concurrent think-aloud procedure to explore the associated clinical reasoning processes.
More experienced clinicians were more accurate in visual diagnosis and spent more of their time looking at relevant areas. At the same time, they explored data less, yet they built and evaluated more diagnostic hypotheses.
Clinicians of varying expertise analyse patient video cases differently. Clinical teachers should take these differences into account when optimising educational formats with patient video cases.
视觉专长依赖于感知和认知过程。目前,在诊断临床病例时,这些过程的知识主要来自于使用静态图片的研究。相比之下,患者视频病例构成了一个动态的诊断挑战,可能模拟了亲自观察和诊断患者的情况。
本研究旨在调查临床医生在诊断真实儿科视频病例时的视觉注意力和伴随的认知过程。
共有 43 名具有不同专业水平的临床医生参与了这项横断面研究。他们诊断了四个简短的儿童视频记录:两个有癫痫发作,两个有模仿癫痫发作的疾病。我们使用眼动追踪来研究在视频病例中观察相关区域的时间,并同时进行出声思维过程,以探索相关的临床推理过程。
更有经验的临床医生在视觉诊断上更准确,并且花更多的时间观察相关区域。同时,他们对数据的探索较少,但构建和评估更多的诊断假设。
不同专业水平的临床医生对患者视频病例的分析方式不同。临床教师在优化使用患者视频病例的教育形式时,应该考虑到这些差异。