Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Worcester/Manchester, MA, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Sep;45(9):1094-102. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q147. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
To evaluate the use of oral, single-agent, broad-spectrum fluoroquinolones in the treatment of low-risk febrile neutropenia (FN).
MEDLINE via Ovid (1948 to May, week 3, 2011) and EMBASE (1980 to 2011, week 21) were searched using the terms febrile neutropenia, fluoroquinolone, quinolone derivative, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and neoplasm. References of selected articles, review articles, and treatment guidelines were reviewed.
Trials evaluating the efficacy of oral, single-agent, broad-spectrum fluoroquinolones in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced FN were included if the majority of patients in the study had low-risk FN. Trials involving pediatric patients, non-Food and Drug Administration-approved fluoroquinolones, or monotherapy with ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin were excluded. Data extracted included study design, patient demographics, antiinfective regimens, and treatment outcomes.
Four clinical trials were included. One trial compared levofloxacin with piperacillin/tazobactam with a success rate (afebrile at 72 hours) of 76.5% in the levofloxacin group compared with 88.3% in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. This trial was not limited to low-risk patients. The remaining 3 trials investigated moxifloxacin monotherapy in low-risk patients. Two of these were noncontrolled trials with success rates (afebrile at 5 days) of 91% and 95%. The final trial randomized patients to moxifloxacin or ceftriaxone and had success rates (hospital discharge at 48 hours) of 79.2% and 73.9%, respectively. In all 4 trials, treatment of FN with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin was deemed to be safe and effective. Although all studies had positive results, they were limited by small sample sizes and the absence of universal use of control comparisons.
Use of oral, single-agent, broad-spectrum fluoroquinolones for outpatient treatment of FN in low-risk patients has shown promising results. At this time, this type of therapy should be limited to low-risk patients. Future clinical trials should include larger sample sizes and a comparison with existing first-line oral therapy-oral ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate.
评估口服单药广谱氟喹诺酮类药物在治疗低危发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)中的应用。
通过 Ovid MEDLINE(1948 年至 2011 年 5 月第 3 周)和 EMBASE(1980 年至 2011 年 21 周)检索了以下术语:发热性中性粒细胞减少症、氟喹诺酮类药物、喹诺酮衍生物、左氧氟沙星、莫西沙星和肿瘤。还回顾了选定文章、综述文章和治疗指南的参考文献。
如果研究中的大多数患者患有低危 FN,则纳入评估口服单药广谱氟喹诺酮类药物治疗化疗诱导性 FN 的疗效的试验。排除涉及儿科患者、未获美国食品和药物管理局批准的氟喹诺酮类药物或环丙沙星或左氧氟沙星单一疗法的试验。提取的数据包括研究设计、患者人口统计学、抗感染方案和治疗结果。
共纳入 4 项临床试验。一项试验比较了左氧氟沙星与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦,在左氧氟沙星组中,72 小时时退热的成功率(无发热)为 76.5%,而在哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组中为 88.3%。该试验并未仅限于低危患者。其余 3 项试验研究了莫西沙星在低危患者中的单药治疗。其中 2 项为非对照试验,退热成功率(第 5 天无发热)分别为 91%和 95%。最后一项试验将患者随机分配至莫西沙星或头孢曲松治疗,48 小时时的成功率(住院出院)分别为 79.2%和 73.9%。在所有 4 项试验中,用左氧氟沙星或莫西沙星治疗 FN 被认为是安全有效的。尽管所有研究均取得了积极的结果,但它们受到样本量小以及未普遍使用对照比较的限制。
在低危患者中,使用口服单药广谱氟喹诺酮类药物进行 FN 的门诊治疗已显示出良好的效果。目前,这种治疗方法应仅限于低危患者。未来的临床试验应包括更大的样本量,并与现有的一线口服治疗(口服环丙沙星加阿莫西林/克拉维酸)进行比较。