• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床乳房检查:印度一项群组随机对照试验的初步结果。

Clinical breast examination: preliminary results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India.

机构信息

Screening Group, Early Detection and Prevention Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 cours Albert Thomas, Lyon 69008, France.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 5;103(19):1476-80. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr304. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djr304
PMID:21862730
Abstract

A cluster randomized controlled trial was initiated in the Trivandrum district (Kerala, India) on January 1, 2006, to evaluate whether three rounds of triennial clinical breast examination (CBE) can reduce the incidence rate of advanced disease incidence and breast cancer mortality. A total of 275 clusters that included 115,652 healthy women, aged 30-69 years, were randomly allocated to intervention (CBE; 133 clusters; 55,844 women) or control (no screening; 142 clusters; 59,808 women) groups. Performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, and positive predictive value) of CBE were evaluated. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed for comparison of incidence rates between the intervention and control groups. Preliminary results for incidence are based on follow-up until May 31, 2009, when the first round of screening was completed. Of the 50,366 women who underwent CBE, 30 breast cancers were detected among 2880 women with suspicious findings in CBE screening that warranted further investigations. Sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, and positive predictive value of CBE were 51.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.2% to 65.0%), 94.3% (95% CI = 94.1% to 94.5%), 5.7% (95% CI = 5.5% to 5.9%), and 1.0% (95% CI = 0.7% to 1.5%), respectively. The age-standardized incidence rates for early-stage (stage IIA or lower) breast cancer were 18.8 and 8.1 per 100,000 women and for advanced-stage (stage IIB or higher) breast cancer were 19.6 and 21.7 per 100,000 women, in the intervention and control groups, respectively.

摘要

一项三年度的临床乳房检查(CBE)能否降低侵袭性疾病发生率和乳腺癌死亡率的随机对照试验于 2006 年 1 月 1 日在印度特里凡得琅地区启动,共有 275 个包含 115652 名 30-69 岁健康女性的集群被随机分配到干预组(CBE;133 个集群;55844 名女性)或对照组(无筛查;142 个集群;59808 名女性)。评估了 CBE 的性能特征(敏感性、特异性、假阳性率和阳性预测值)。采用意向治疗分析比较了干预组和对照组的发病率。发病率的初步结果基于截至 2009 年 5 月 31 日的随访,此时第一轮筛查已经完成。在接受 CBE 的 50366 名女性中,30 例乳腺癌在 CBE 筛查中发现,2880 名女性的 CBE 筛查结果可疑,需要进一步检查。CBE 的敏感性、特异性、假阳性率和阳性预测值分别为 51.7%(95%置信区间[CI]:38.2%至 65.0%)、94.3%(95% CI:94.1%至 94.5%)、5.7%(95% CI:5.5%至 5.9%)和 1.0%(95% CI:0.7%至 1.5%)。早期(IIA 期或更低)乳腺癌的年龄标准化发病率分别为每 100000 名妇女 18.8 和 8.1 例,晚期(IIB 期或更高)乳腺癌的发病率分别为每 100000 名妇女 19.6 和 21.7 例,在干预组和对照组中。

相似文献

1
Clinical breast examination: preliminary results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India.临床乳房检查:印度一项群组随机对照试验的初步结果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 5;103(19):1476-80. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr304. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
2
Early findings from a community-based, cluster-randomized, controlled oral cancer screening trial in Kerala, India. The Trivandrum Oral Cancer Screening Study Group.印度喀拉拉邦一项基于社区的整群随机对照口腔癌筛查试验的早期结果。特里凡得琅口腔癌筛查研究小组。
Cancer. 2000 Feb 1;88(3):664-73.
3
The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.临床乳腺检查对乳腺筛查准确性的贡献。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Sep 16;101(18):1236-43. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp241. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
4
Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.发展中国家的乳腺癌筛查政策:印度的成本效益分析
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1290-300. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn292. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
5
Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer?临床乳腺检查筛查:它漏诊致命性乳腺癌的频率有多高?
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005(35):67-71. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi040.
6
Effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14-years follow-up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in Trivandrum, India.临床乳房检查三年筛查的效果:印度特里凡得琅的随机临床试验 14 年随访结果。
Cancer. 2023 Jan 15;129(2):272-282. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34526. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
7
Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.基于人群的亚洲女性乳腺癌筛查患病率及检测随机试验的中间测量结果:新加坡乳腺癌筛查项目
Cancer. 1998 Apr 15;82(8):1521-8.
8
Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.1991年4月至1997年3月哥本哈根乳腺癌的乳腺X线筛查。乳腺X线筛查评估小组。
APMIS Suppl. 1998;83:1-44.
9
Determinants of compliance in a cluster randomised controlled trial on screening of breast and cervix cancer in mumbai, India. 2. Compliance to referral and treatment.印度孟买一项关于乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的整群随机对照试验中依从性的决定因素。2. 转诊及治疗的依从性。
Oncology. 2007;73(3-4):154-61. doi: 10.1159/000126498. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
10
Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?近期乳腺钼靶筛查结果为阴性的女性中的晚期乳腺癌:临床诊疗是否提供了早期检测的机会?
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005(35):39-46. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi036.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and feasibility of diagnostic heatflow imaging in patients with palpable breast lesions: a pilot study.可触及乳腺病变患者诊断性热流成像的评估及可行性:一项初步研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08093-5.
2
Risk-adjusted breast screening: an Australian perspective and considerations for the Western Pacific.风险调整后的乳腺筛查:澳大利亚视角及西太平洋地区的考量
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Mar 19;57:101520. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101520. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Breast Cancer Screening Using Clinical Breast Examination: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for South Africa.
使用临床乳腺检查进行乳腺癌筛查:南非的成本效益分析
Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Sep;49:101127. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101127. Epub 2025 May 27.
4
Inequality in breast cancer: Global statistics from 2022 to 2050.乳腺癌方面的不平等:2022年至2050年的全球统计数据
Breast. 2025 Feb;79:103851. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103851. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
The Clinical Utility of a Hand-Held Piezoelectric Scanner in the Detection of Early Tumor and Changes in Breast Texture.手持式压电扫描仪在早期肿瘤检测及乳腺组织纹理变化检测中的临床应用。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 1;16(10):e70586. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70586. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Screening for Breast Cancer: A Comparative Review of Guidelines.乳腺癌筛查:指南的比较性综述
Life (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;14(6):777. doi: 10.3390/life14060777.
7
Awareness regarding breast cancer amongst women in Pakistan: A systematic review and meta-analysis.巴基斯坦女性对乳腺癌的认知:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0298275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298275. eCollection 2024.
8
Temporal patterns of cancer burden in Asia, 1990-2019: a systematic examination for the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study.1990 - 2019年亚洲癌症负担的时间模式:针对《2019年全球疾病负担研究》的系统分析
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 Jan 2;21:100333. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100333. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Unmet Social Needs and Breast Cancer Screening Utilization and Stage at Presentation.未满足的社会需求与乳腺癌筛查利用及就诊时分期的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2355301. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55301.
10
Breast cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening.乳腺癌:流行病学、风险因素与筛查
Chin J Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 30;35(6):565-583. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.06.02.