Functional Neuroimaging Group, Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, Magdeburg, Germany.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012 Feb;32(2):291-305. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.126. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
To study how various anesthetics affect the relationship between stimulus frequency and generated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals in the rat dentate gyrus, the perforant pathway was electrically stimulated with repetitive low frequency (i.e., 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 Hz) stimulation trains under isoflurane/N(2)O, isoflurane, medetomidine, and α-chloralose. During stimulation, the blood oxygen level-dependent signal intensity (BOLD response) and local field potentials in the dentate gyrus were simultaneously recorded to prove whether the present anesthetic controls the generation of a BOLD response via targeting general hemodynamic parameters, by affecting mechanisms of neurovascular coupling, or by disrupting local signal processing. Using this combined electrophysiological/fMRI approach, we found that the threshold frequency (i.e., the minimal frequency required to trigger significant BOLD responses), the optimal frequency (i.e., the frequency that elicit the strongest BOLD response), and the spatial distribution of generated BOLD responses are specific for each anesthetic used. Concurrent with anesthetic-dependent characteristics of the BOLD response, we found the pattern of stimulus-induced neuronal activity in the dentate gyrus is also specific for each anesthetic. Consequently, the anesthetic-specific influence on local signaling processes is the underlying cause for the observation that an identical stimulus elicits different BOLD responses under various anesthetics.
为了研究各种麻醉剂如何影响刺激频率与大鼠齿状回产生的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)信号之间的关系,我们在异氟烷/N₂O、异氟烷、右美托咪定和α-氯醛糖条件下,使用重复的低频(即 0.625、1.25、2.5、5 和 10 Hz)电刺激刺激束,对穿通途径进行电刺激。在刺激过程中,同时记录齿状回中的血氧水平依赖信号强度(BOLD 反应)和局部场电位,以证明当前的麻醉剂是否通过针对一般血流动力学参数来控制 BOLD 反应的产生,是否通过影响神经血管耦联机制,或者通过破坏局部信号处理来控制。使用这种联合电生理/fMRI 方法,我们发现,阈频率(即触发显著 BOLD 反应所需的最小频率)、最佳频率(即引发最强 BOLD 反应的频率)和生成的 BOLD 反应的空间分布对于每种使用的麻醉剂都是特定的。与 BOLD 反应的麻醉剂依赖性特征一致,我们发现,齿状回中刺激诱导的神经元活动模式也因每种麻醉剂而异。因此,局部信号处理的麻醉剂特异性影响是观察到相同刺激在不同麻醉剂下产生不同 BOLD 反应的根本原因。