Stadlbauer A, Bernt R, Salomonowitz E, Plas E, Strunk G, Eberhardt K
Zentrales Institut für Radiologie, Diagnostik und Interventionelle Therapie, Landesklinikum St. Pölten, Osterreich.
Rofo. 2011 Oct;183(10):925-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281601. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
The aim of this study was the health-economic analysis of MR imaging in the diagnostics of suspicious prostate carcinoma (PCa) before execution of a first biopsy.
The health-economic analysis included four steps: modeling, determination of probabilities, evaluation, and sensitivity analyses. We performed an effectiveness analysis from the patient perspective as well as a cost-effectiveness and a cost-utility analysis from the health insurance perspective for Austria and Germany. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis used a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 patients. The result parameters were number of biopsies, number of detected PCa, and monetary costs. For the cost-efficiency analysis, the result parameters, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs, were calculated for an individual patient.
The efficiency analysis showed that MRI before a first biopsy can prevent ca. 64,000 unnecessary biopsies/ 100,000 patients. The diagnostic efficiency was higher by a factor of 1.7. Due to MRI, eight PCas were additionally detected. From a health insurance perspective, MRI was not cost-effective. Extra costs of ca. 42 m. € per 100,000 patients and of 650 € per prevented biopsy were calculated. The costs per detected PCa were increased by 1395 €. The attainable QALYs were a little higher for the MRI alternative, which was therefore not dominated.
Our results do not permit a clear recommendation for or against the application of MRI in the diagnostics of PCa. From the patient perspective, it is to be endorsed due to the higher medical efficiency. However, it is connected with higher health insurance costs.
本研究旨在对首次活检前可疑前列腺癌(PCa)诊断中的磁共振成像(MR成像)进行健康经济学分析。
健康经济学分析包括四个步骤:建模、概率确定、评估和敏感性分析。我们从患者角度进行了有效性分析,并从奥地利和德国的医疗保险角度进行了成本效益分析和成本效用分析。有效性和成本效益分析使用了一个由100,000名患者组成的假设队列。结果参数为活检次数、检测到的PCa数量和货币成本。对于成本效率分析,计算了个体患者的结果参数,即质量调整生命年(QALY)和成本。
效率分析表明,首次活检前的MRI可预防约64,000次不必要的活检/100,000名患者。诊断效率提高了1.7倍。由于MRI,另外检测到8例PCa。从医疗保险角度来看,MRI不具有成本效益。计算得出每100,000名患者额外成本约为4200万欧元,每预防一次活检额外成本为650欧元。每例检测到的PCa成本增加了1395欧元。MRI方案可获得的QALY略高,因此并非劣势方案。
我们的结果无法明确推荐支持或反对在PCa诊断中应用MRI。从患者角度来看,由于更高的医疗效率,它是值得认可的。然而,它与更高的医疗保险成本相关。