• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[活检前磁共振成像用于前列腺癌诊断的卫生经济学评价]

[Health-economic evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer].

作者信息

Stadlbauer A, Bernt R, Salomonowitz E, Plas E, Strunk G, Eberhardt K

机构信息

Zentrales Institut für Radiologie, Diagnostik und Interventionelle Therapie, Landesklinikum St. Pölten, Osterreich.

出版信息

Rofo. 2011 Oct;183(10):925-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281601. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1281601
PMID:21863536
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was the health-economic analysis of MR imaging in the diagnostics of suspicious prostate carcinoma (PCa) before execution of a first biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The health-economic analysis included four steps: modeling, determination of probabilities, evaluation, and sensitivity analyses. We performed an effectiveness analysis from the patient perspective as well as a cost-effectiveness and a cost-utility analysis from the health insurance perspective for Austria and Germany. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis used a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 patients. The result parameters were number of biopsies, number of detected PCa, and monetary costs. For the cost-efficiency analysis, the result parameters, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs, were calculated for an individual patient.

RESULTS

The efficiency analysis showed that MRI before a first biopsy can prevent ca. 64,000 unnecessary biopsies/ 100,000 patients. The diagnostic efficiency was higher by a factor of 1.7. Due to MRI, eight PCas were additionally detected. From a health insurance perspective, MRI was not cost-effective. Extra costs of ca. 42 m. € per 100,000 patients and of 650 € per prevented biopsy were calculated. The costs per detected PCa were increased by 1395 €. The attainable QALYs were a little higher for the MRI alternative, which was therefore not dominated.

CONCLUSION

Our results do not permit a clear recommendation for or against the application of MRI in the diagnostics of PCa. From the patient perspective, it is to be endorsed due to the higher medical efficiency. However, it is connected with higher health insurance costs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对首次活检前可疑前列腺癌(PCa)诊断中的磁共振成像(MR成像)进行健康经济学分析。

材料与方法

健康经济学分析包括四个步骤:建模、概率确定、评估和敏感性分析。我们从患者角度进行了有效性分析,并从奥地利和德国的医疗保险角度进行了成本效益分析和成本效用分析。有效性和成本效益分析使用了一个由100,000名患者组成的假设队列。结果参数为活检次数、检测到的PCa数量和货币成本。对于成本效率分析,计算了个体患者的结果参数,即质量调整生命年(QALY)和成本。

结果

效率分析表明,首次活检前的MRI可预防约64,000次不必要的活检/100,000名患者。诊断效率提高了1.7倍。由于MRI,另外检测到8例PCa。从医疗保险角度来看,MRI不具有成本效益。计算得出每100,000名患者额外成本约为4200万欧元,每预防一次活检额外成本为650欧元。每例检测到的PCa成本增加了1395欧元。MRI方案可获得的QALY略高,因此并非劣势方案。

结论

我们的结果无法明确推荐支持或反对在PCa诊断中应用MRI。从患者角度来看,由于更高的医疗效率,它是值得认可的。然而,它与更高的医疗保险成本相关。

相似文献

1
[Health-economic evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer].[活检前磁共振成像用于前列腺癌诊断的卫生经济学评价]
Rofo. 2011 Oct;183(10):925-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281601. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
2
[Health economics evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer for Austria and Germany].[奥地利和德国前列腺癌分期磁共振成像的卫生经济学评估]
Rofo. 2012 Jun;184(6):556-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299448. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
3
Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective.磁共振成像(MR)和 MR 引导靶向活检与系统经直肠超声引导活检诊断前列腺癌的成本效益比较:基于卫生保健角度的建模研究。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.012. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
4
[Incremental cost effectiveness of multifocal cataract surgery].[多焦点白内障手术的增量成本效益]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2007 Feb;224(2):101-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927403.
5
Cost utility and budget impact of third-generation aromatase inhibitors for advanced breast cancer: a literature-based model analysis of costs in the Italian National Health Service.第三代芳香化酶抑制剂用于晚期乳腺癌的成本效用和预算影响:基于意大利国家医疗服务体系成本的文献模型分析
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1546-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.014.
6
The incremental cost effectiveness of in-patient versus out-patient rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty - results of a pilot investigation.全髋关节置换术后住院康复与门诊康复的增量成本效益——一项初步调查的结果
Eur J Med Res. 2008 Jun 24;13(6):267-74.
7
[Cost analysis of contrast-enhanced cranial MRI at a German university hospital].[德国一家大学医院头颅对比增强磁共振成像的成本分析]
Rofo. 2010 Oct;182(10):891-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245511. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
8
The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with internal derangement of the knee.膝关节内部紊乱患者磁共振成像的成本效益
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Spring;15(2):392-405.
9
[Decision-analytical modelling of costs per QALY in the context of the German Social Law].[德国社会法背景下每质量调整生命年成本的决策分析模型]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Nov;71(11):739-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220756. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
10
Health-economic comparison of three recommended drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis.三种推荐用于治疗骨质疏松症的药物的卫生经济学比较
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 2004;24(1):1-10.

引用本文的文献

1
[Health technology assessment (HTA). Developments in healthcare and potential for radiology].[卫生技术评估(HTA)。医疗保健领域的发展及放射学的潜力]
Radiologe. 2014 Jun;54(6):589-98. doi: 10.1007/s00117-014-2695-6.