Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, P217 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E9.
Addict Behav. 2011 Dec;36(12):1174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.07.020. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
Daily process studies of internal drinking motives have not examined motive specificity, i.e., whether theoretically plausible trait and situational antecedents differ in their ability to predict the extent to which alcohol consumption on any given day is motivated by coping or enhancement.
University students (N=81) completed trait measures of coping and enhancement-motivated drinking (trait CM and EM), sensation seeking, and conscientiousness, and then completed a 14-day online diary assessing daily completion of tasks, daily alcohol use, and (on days when alcohol was consumed) the extent to which drinking was motivated by coping or enhancement (daily CM and EM).
Hierarchical linear models revealed unique situational and trait antecedents of daily CM and EM. In the daily EM drinking model, main effects of daily positive affect (b=0.11, p<0.05), trait EM (b=2.88, p<0.01), and trait sensation seeking (b=0.36, p<0.01) were qualified by cross-level interactions between daily task accomplishment and trait conscientiousness (b=0.03, p<0.01), and daily task accomplishment and trait sensation seeking (b=0.03, p<0.01). In the daily CM drinking model, main effects of daily positive affect (b=-0.08, p<0.05), daily negative affect (b=0.13, p<0.05), and trait CM (b=4.40, p<0.01), were qualified by cross-level interactions between trait CM and daily positive affect (b=-0.12, p<0.05), trait CM and daily negative affect (b=0.18, p<0.01), and trait conscientiousness and daily task accomplishment (b=0.01, p<0.01).
Our results replicated and extended Cooper et al.'s (1995) findings on the differential roles of sensation seeking and negative affect in CM and EM drinking at the daily level, and call into question the view that drinking motives should be solely conceptualized as individual difference variables. Theoretical and applied implications of the findings are discussed.
内部饮酒动机的日常过程研究尚未检验动机特异性,即理论上合理的特质和情境前因是否在预测特定日子里饮酒的程度上有所不同,这种程度是由应对还是增强动机引起的。
大学生(N=81)完成了应对和增强型饮酒特质(特质 CM 和 EM)、感觉寻求和尽责性的特质测量,然后完成了为期 14 天的在线日记评估,记录每天完成的任务、每天的酒精使用量,以及(在饮酒的日子里)饮酒是由应对还是增强动机引起的程度(每日 CM 和 EM)。
层次线性模型揭示了日常 CM 和 EM 的独特情境和特质前因。在每日 EM 饮酒模型中,每日积极情绪(b=0.11,p<0.05)、特质 EM(b=2.88,p<0.01)和特质感觉寻求(b=0.36,p<0.01)的主要效应受到每日任务完成与特质尽责性(b=0.03,p<0.01)以及每日任务完成与特质感觉寻求(b=0.03,p<0.01)之间的交叉水平交互作用的限制。在每日 CM 饮酒模型中,每日积极情绪(b=-0.08,p<0.05)、每日消极情绪(b=0.13,p<0.05)和特质 CM(b=4.40,p<0.01)的主要效应受到特质 CM 与每日积极情绪(b=-0.12,p<0.05)、特质 CM 与每日消极情绪(b=0.18,p<0.01)以及特质尽责性与每日任务完成(b=0.01,p<0.01)之间的交叉水平交互作用的限制。
我们的研究结果复制并扩展了 Cooper 等人(1995 年)关于感觉寻求和消极情绪在每日 CM 和 EM 饮酒中的差异作用的发现,并对将饮酒动机仅视为个体差异变量的观点提出了质疑。讨论了这些发现的理论和应用意义。