• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

'EASIdig'--一种用于记录特应性皮炎疾病活动的数字工具。

'EASIdig'--a digital tool to document disease activity in atopic dermatitis.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Allergy Unit, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Dermatology. 2011;223(1):68-73. doi: 10.1159/000330333. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1159/000330333
PMID:21865675
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different scoring systems have been developed to determine the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD); the SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) and EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) are among the best-validated scoring systems.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to produce a rational quality control for routine clinical use by using the modern facilities of digital imaging.

METHODS

63 AD patients were scored by a single person at each visit using the SCORAD and EASI scoring methods. Images were taken and rated by two non-dermatology physicians trained in the scoring system. In addition, blood samples were taken for the determination of total IgE, eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein.

RESULTS

The EASI score established from the digital images, hereby named 'EASIdig', correlated at all visits with the results of the SCORAD and EASI. Together with immunological parameters, they also reflected changes of disease severity during the 3 time points.

CONCLUSION

The digital evaluation of the EASI is a reliable tool for the digital assessment of severity and extent of AD.

摘要

背景

已经开发出不同的评分系统来确定特应性皮炎(AD)的严重程度;SCORAD(特应性皮炎评分)和 EASI(湿疹面积和严重程度指数)是验证效果最好的评分系统之一。

目的

本研究的目的是利用数字成像的现代设备,为常规临床应用提供合理的质量控制。

方法

63 例 AD 患者在每次就诊时均由单人使用 SCORAD 和 EASI 评分方法进行评分。拍摄图像,并由两名接受过评分系统培训的非皮肤科医生进行评分。此外,还采集血液样本以测定总 IgE、嗜酸性粒细胞和嗜酸性阳离子蛋白。

结果

从数字图像中得出的 EASI 评分,命名为“EASIdig”,在所有就诊时均与 SCORAD 和 EASI 的结果相关。与免疫参数一起,它们还反映了疾病严重程度在 3 个时间点的变化。

结论

EASI 的数字评估是一种可靠的工具,可用于 AD 的严重程度和范围的数字评估。

相似文献

1
'EASIdig'--a digital tool to document disease activity in atopic dermatitis.'EASIdig'--一种用于记录特应性皮炎疾病活动的数字工具。
Dermatology. 2011;223(1):68-73. doi: 10.1159/000330333. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
2
Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: a comparison of two scoring systems.特应性皮炎的严重程度评分:两种评分系统的比较。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2008 Jul-Aug;36(4):205-11.
3
Significance of interleukin-16, macrophage-derived chemokine, eosinophil cationic protein and soluble E-selectin in reflecting disease activity of atopic dermatitis--from laboratory parameters to clinical scores.白细胞介素-16、巨噬细胞衍生趋化因子、嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白及可溶性E选择素在反映特应性皮炎疾病活动度中的意义——从实验室指标到临床评分
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Jun;154(6):1112-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07201.x.
4
The objective severity assessment of atopic dermatitis (OSAAD) score: validity, reliability and sensitivity in adult patients with atopic dermatitis.成人特应性皮炎客观严重程度评估(OSAAD)评分:在成人特应性皮炎患者中的有效性、可靠性和敏感性
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Oct;153(4):767-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06697.x.
5
The Self-administered Eczema Area and Severity Index in children with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: better estimation of AD body surface area than severity.中重度特应性皮炎患儿的自我管理湿疹面积和严重程度指数:对特应性皮炎体表面积的估计优于严重程度评估。
Pediatr Dermatol. 2010 Sep-Oct;27(5):470-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2010.01285.x. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
6
Are age-specific high serum IgE levels associated with worse symptomatology in children with atopic dermatitis?特应性皮炎患儿中,特定年龄的高血清IgE水平是否与更严重的症状相关?
Int J Dermatol. 2007 Dec;46(12):1258-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03407.x.
7
Characteristics of extrinsic vs. intrinsic atopic dermatitis in infancy: correlations with laboratory variables.婴儿期外源性与内源性特应性皮炎的特征:与实验室指标的相关性
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Oct;155(4):778-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07394.x.
8
Correlations of serum Interleukin-16, total IgE, eosinophil cationic protein and total eosinophil counts with disease activity in children with atopic dermatitis.特应性皮炎患儿血清白细胞介素-16、总 IgE、嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白和总嗜酸性粒细胞计数与疾病活动的相关性。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011 Jan-Mar;24(1):15-23. doi: 10.1177/039463201102400103.
9
The Atopic Dermatitis Quickscore (ADQ): validation of a new parent-administered atopic dermatitis scoring tool.特应性皮炎快速评分(ADQ):一种新的由家长实施的特应性皮炎评分工具的验证
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Nov;101(5):500-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60289-X.
10
Serum mast cell tryptase is not a useful marker for disease severity in psoriasis or atopic dermatitis.血清肥大细胞类胰蛋白酶并非银屑病或特应性皮炎疾病严重程度的有效标志物。
Br J Dermatol. 2009 Apr;160(4):736-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08972.x. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of remote atopic dermatitis severity assessment with the Eczema Area and Severity Ondex in children using caregiver-provided photos and videos.使用照顾者提供的照片和视频,通过湿疹面积和严重程度指数对儿童远程特应性皮炎严重程度评估的验证。
Pediatr Dermatol. 2022 Jul;39(4):547-552. doi: 10.1111/pde.15003. Epub 2022 May 6.
2
Digital Tools for Assessing Disease Severity in Dermatology.用于评估皮肤科疾病严重程度的数字工具。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2022 Mar 3;13(2):190-198. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_636_21. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
3
Differences in Psychometric Properties of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Atopic Dermatitis by Race and Skin Tone: A Systematic Review.
按种族和肤色划分的特应性皮炎患者报告结局评估工具的心理测量学特性的差异:系统评价。
J Invest Dermatol. 2022 Feb;142(2):364-381. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.06.033. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
4
Blueprint for mechanistic, data-rich early phase clinical pharmacology studies in dermatology.皮肤病学中基于机制、数据丰富的早期临床药理学研究蓝图。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;86(6):1011-1014. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14293. Epub 2020 Apr 6.