• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估皮肤科疾病严重程度的数字工具。

Digital Tools for Assessing Disease Severity in Dermatology.

作者信息

Modasia Khushboo H, Kaliyadan Feroze

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, NAMO Medical College and Research Institute, Sivassa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, India.

Department of Dermatology, Sree Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Indian Dermatol Online J. 2022 Mar 3;13(2):190-198. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_636_21. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.4103/idoj.idoj_636_21
PMID:35287409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8917499/
Abstract

Innumerable scoring systems have been introduced to measure the disease severity of various dermatological conditions. The development of such scores has proved to be beneficial to assess disease progression and treatment effectiveness in the context of dermatological research. However, these scoring systems tend to be time consuming, monotonous, and hence often difficult to use during overburdened routine clinical consultations, especially when it is in the form of a paper-based system. Many of the scoring systems are now available in the digital form, such as smart phone apps. This aids to calculate effortlessly and reduces human errors associated with paper-based formats. Various calculators like Psoriasis Area Severity Index calculators, Severity Scoring Of Atopic Dermatitis, and Melasma Area Severity Index have been introduced in the digital format for a quicker, efficient quality of work and uncomplicated data storage. This review highlights and discusses some of the digital tools available at present for severity scoring in dermatology.

摘要

为衡量各种皮肤病的疾病严重程度，人们引入了无数种评分系统。事实证明，此类评分系统的开发有助于在皮肤病研究中评估疾病进展和治疗效果。然而，这些评分系统往往耗时、单调，因此在繁忙的常规临床会诊中常常难以使用，尤其是在它以纸质系统的形式存在时。现在许多评分系统都有数字形式，比如智能手机应用程序。这有助于轻松计算，并减少与纸质格式相关的人为错误。各种计算器，如银屑病面积严重指数计算器、特应性皮炎严重程度评分器和黄褐斑面积严重指数计算器，已以数字形式推出，以实现更快、更高效的工作质量和简单的数据存储。这篇综述重点介绍并讨论了目前皮肤科用于严重程度评分的一些数字工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/5e6845e5baea/IDOJ-13-190-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/db32a70b8b65/IDOJ-13-190-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/c26b9f525442/IDOJ-13-190-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/138944ed43a0/IDOJ-13-190-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/a9f5bcbb54af/IDOJ-13-190-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/d5a14203eca9/IDOJ-13-190-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/38ffa6b05819/IDOJ-13-190-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/35823ff8989b/IDOJ-13-190-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/fbd9940bbcb8/IDOJ-13-190-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/994eb919dd4b/IDOJ-13-190-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/8879ccf900b4/IDOJ-13-190-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/a8fc41d12aa4/IDOJ-13-190-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/33e0f24125da/IDOJ-13-190-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/7b2a50ddc73a/IDOJ-13-190-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/44e55203cc2a/IDOJ-13-190-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/31ee4c817a34/IDOJ-13-190-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/b399a17360e6/IDOJ-13-190-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/5e6845e5baea/IDOJ-13-190-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/db32a70b8b65/IDOJ-13-190-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/c26b9f525442/IDOJ-13-190-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/138944ed43a0/IDOJ-13-190-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/a9f5bcbb54af/IDOJ-13-190-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/d5a14203eca9/IDOJ-13-190-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/38ffa6b05819/IDOJ-13-190-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/35823ff8989b/IDOJ-13-190-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/fbd9940bbcb8/IDOJ-13-190-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/994eb919dd4b/IDOJ-13-190-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/8879ccf900b4/IDOJ-13-190-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/a8fc41d12aa4/IDOJ-13-190-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/33e0f24125da/IDOJ-13-190-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/7b2a50ddc73a/IDOJ-13-190-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/44e55203cc2a/IDOJ-13-190-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/31ee4c817a34/IDOJ-13-190-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/b399a17360e6/IDOJ-13-190-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2c/8917499/5e6845e5baea/IDOJ-13-190-g017.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Tools for Assessing Disease Severity in Dermatology.用于评估皮肤科疾病严重程度的数字工具。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2022 Mar 3;13(2):190-198. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_636_21. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
2
The applicability of clinical scoring systems: SCORAD and PASI in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.临床评分系统的适用性：SCORAD和PASI在银屑病和特应性皮炎中的应用
Acta Derm Venereol. 1997 Sep;77(5):392-3. doi: 10.2340/0001555577392393.
3
Measuring Atopic Dermatitis Disease Severity: The Potential for Electronic Tools to Benefit Clinical Care.测量特应性皮炎疾病严重程度：电子工具在改善临床护理方面的潜力。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Apr;9(4):1473-1486.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.02.027.
4
Severity strata for Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), modified EASI, Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), objective SCORAD, Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index and body surface area in adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis.特应性皮炎青少年和成人患者的湿疹面积和严重程度指数（EASI）、改良 EASI、特应性皮炎评分（SCORAD）、客观 SCORAD、特应性皮炎严重程度指数和体表面积严重程度分层。
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;177(5):1316-1321. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15641. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
5
Approach to the Assessment and Management of Adult Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Consensus Document. Section II: Tools for Assessing the Severity of Atopic Dermatitis.成人特应性皮炎评估与管理方法：共识文件。第二部分：特应性皮炎严重程度评估工具
J Cutan Med Surg. 2018 Nov/Dec;22(1_suppl):10S-16S. doi: 10.1177/1203475418803628.
6
An audit of the impact of a consultation with a paediatric dermatology team on quality of life in infants with atopic eczema and their families: further validation of the Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index and Dermatitis Family Impact score.一项关于与儿科皮肤科团队会诊对特应性皮炎婴儿及其家庭生活质量影响的审计：婴儿性皮炎生活质量指数和皮炎家庭影响评分的进一步验证
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Dec;155(6):1249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07525.x.
7
'EASIdig'--a digital tool to document disease activity in atopic dermatitis.'EASIdig'--一种用于记录特应性皮炎疾病活动的数字工具。
Dermatology. 2011;223(1):68-73. doi: 10.1159/000330333. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
8
Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy improves quality of life of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients up to 3 months: Results from an observational multicenter study.窄谱中波紫外线光疗可改善银屑病和特应性皮炎患者的生活质量长达 3 个月：一项观察性多中心研究结果。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2019 Sep;35(5):332-338. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12479. Epub 2019 May 20.
9
Proposing Melasma Severity Index: A New, More Practical, Office-based Scoring System for Assessing the Severity of Melasma.提出黄褐斑严重程度指数：一种新的、更实用的、基于门诊的黄褐斑严重程度评估评分系统。
Indian J Dermatol. 2016 Jan-Feb;61(1):39-44. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.174024.
10
Validity and reliability of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health scale in adults with atopic dermatitis.特应性皮炎成人患者报告结局测量信息系统全球健康量表的有效性和信度。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Sep;85(3):636-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.01.033. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in the study and application of digital technology in the clinical practice of atopic dermatitis.数字技术在特应性皮炎临床实践中的研究与应用进展。
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 10;11:20552076251377957. doi: 10.1177/20552076251377957. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
AI in Aesthetic/Cosmetic Dermatology: Current and Future.人工智能在美容皮肤科的现状与未来
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Jan;24(1):e16640. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16640. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
3
Strokecopilot: a literature-based clinical decision support system for acute ischemic stroke treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
The inevitability of change.变化的必然性。
Clin Dermatol. 2019 Jan-Feb;37(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
2
Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis.用于系统性硬化症临床试验的改良罗德南皮肤评分的标准化。
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2(1):11-18. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000231.
3
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.基于深度神经网络的皮肤癌皮肤科医生级分类。
StrokeCopilot：一种基于文献的急性缺血性脑卒中治疗临床决策支持系统。
J Neurol. 2023 Dec;270(12):6113-6123. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11979-6. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
4
Comparison of the Novel Digital Multi-dimension Botong Score with the Brief Pain Inventory for Evaluating Cancer-Related Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial.新型数字多维柏通评分与简明疼痛量表在评估癌症相关疼痛方面的比较：一项随机交叉试验
Pain Ther. 2023 Dec;12(6):1375-1384. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00550-w. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
5
Disease Assessment in Psoriasis.银屑病的疾病评估
Indian J Dermatol. 2023 May-Jun;68(3):278-281. doi: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_420_23.
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118. doi: 10.1038/nature21056. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
4
AISI: A New Disease Severity Assessment Tool for Hidradenitis Suppurativa.AISI：一种用于化脓性汗腺炎的新疾病严重程度评估工具。
Wounds. 2015 Oct;27(10):258-64.
5
Nail Assessment in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (NAPPA): development and validation of a tool for assessment of nail psoriasis outcomes.银屑病和银屑病关节炎的甲病评估（NAPPA）：一种评估甲银屑病结局的工具的制定和验证。
Br J Dermatol. 2014 Mar;170(3):591-8. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12664.
6
'EASIdig'--a digital tool to document disease activity in atopic dermatitis.'EASIdig'--一种用于记录特应性皮炎疾病活动的数字工具。
Dermatology. 2011;223(1):68-73. doi: 10.1159/000330333. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
7
Application of the DAREA/DAPSA score for assessment of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis.DAREA/DAPSA 评分在评估银屑病关节炎疾病活动度中的应用。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Aug;69(8):1441-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.122259. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
8
Evaluating psoriasis with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Psoriasis Global Assessment, and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment.使用银屑病面积和严重程度指数、银屑病整体评估以及网格系统医生整体评估来评估银屑病。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Oct;51(4):563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.04.012.
9
10 years experience of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).皮肤病生活质量指数（DLQI）的10年经验。
J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2004 Mar;9(2):169-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1087-0024.2004.09113.x.
10
Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index. Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis.特应性皮炎的严重程度评分：SCORAD指数。欧洲特应性皮炎工作组共识报告。
Dermatology. 1993;186(1):23-31. doi: 10.1159/000247298.