Mahler Simon A, Massey Greta, Meskill Liliana, Wang Hao, Arnold Thomas C
Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Int J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug 25;4:53. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-4-53.
Studies have shown that vein size is an important predictor of successful ultrasound-guided vascular access. The objective of this study is to evaluate maneuvers designed to increase basilic vein size, which could be used to facilitate ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access (USGPIV) in the Emergency Department (ED) setting.
This was a prospective non-randomized trial. Healthy volunteers aged 18-65 were enrolled. Basilic veins were identified and the cross-sectional area measured sonographically. Following baseline measurement, the following maneuvers were performed: application of a tourniquet, inflation of a blood pressure (BP) cuff, application of a tourniquet with the arm lowered, and BP cuff inflation with the arm lowered. Following each maneuver there was 30 s of recovery time, and a baseline measurement was repeated to ensure that the vein had returned to baseline. Change in basilic vein size was modeled using mixed model analysis with a Tukey correction for multiple comparisons to determine if significant differences existed between different maneuvers.
Over the 5-month study period, 96 basilic veins were assessed from 52 volunteers. All of the maneuvers resulted in a statistically significant increase in basilic vein size from baseline (p < 0.001). BP cuff inflation had the greatest increase in vein size from baseline 17%, 0.87 mm 95% CI (0.70-1.04). BP cuff inflation statistically significantly increased vein size compared to tourniquet placement by 3%, 0.16 mm 95% CI (0.02-0.30).
The largest increase in basilic vein size was due to blood pressure cuff inflation. BP cuff inflation resulted in a statistically significant increase in vein size compared to tourniquet application, but this difference may not be clinically significant.
研究表明静脉大小是超声引导下血管穿刺成功的重要预测指标。本研究的目的是评估旨在增加贵要静脉大小的操作方法,这些方法可用于在急诊科环境中促进超声引导下外周静脉穿刺(USGPIV)。
这是一项前瞻性非随机试验。纳入了年龄在18至65岁之间的健康志愿者。识别出贵要静脉并通过超声测量其横截面积。在基线测量后,进行以下操作:应用止血带、充气血压袖带、手臂下垂时应用止血带以及手臂下垂时充气血压袖带。每次操作后有30秒的恢复时间,并重复进行基线测量以确保静脉恢复到基线状态。使用混合模型分析对贵要静脉大小的变化进行建模,并采用Tukey校正进行多重比较,以确定不同操作之间是否存在显著差异。
在为期5个月的研究期间,对52名志愿者的96条贵要静脉进行了评估。所有操作均导致贵要静脉大小较基线有统计学显著增加(p < 0.001)。与基线相比,充气血压袖带导致的静脉大小增加最大,为17%,即0.87毫米,95%置信区间(0.70 - 1.04)。与应用止血带相比,充气血压袖带使静脉大小在统计学上显著增加了3%,即0.16毫米,95%置信区间(0.02 - 0.30)。
贵要静脉大小增加最多的原因是充气血压袖带。与应用止血带相比,充气血压袖带使静脉大小在统计学上显著增加,但这种差异可能在临床上并不显著。