Hartnell G G, Gibson R N, Williams R, Hemingway A P
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, U.K.
Eur J Radiol. 1990 Mar-Apr;10(2):147-53. doi: 10.1016/0720-048x(90)90125-u.
Few previous studies of the accuracy of duplex Doppler in the assessment of carotid artery stenosis have looked at the accuracy in excluding disease in populations with a significant number of normal arteries. In addition, few studies have compared different criteria for stenosis. Duplex Doppler was used to evaluate the carotid arteries in 80 patients. Two well-described methods for analysing Doppler traces were used and the results were compared with those obtained from non-selective digital subtraction angiography. On the basis of these findings, the Doppler criteria used for carotid stenosis were redefined in terms of changes in peak velocity rather than Doppler frequency shift. Using these criteria, the sensitivity of Doppler in identifying carotid stenosis was 97% (98% sensitivity for greater than 50% stenosis) and specificity was increased from 84% to 93%.
以往很少有关于双功多普勒评估颈动脉狭窄准确性的研究关注在有大量正常动脉的人群中排除疾病的准确性。此外,很少有研究比较不同的狭窄标准。对80例患者使用双功多普勒评估颈动脉。采用两种描述详细的分析多普勒信号的方法,并将结果与非选择性数字减影血管造影获得的结果进行比较。基于这些发现,根据峰值速度的变化而非多普勒频移重新定义了用于颈动脉狭窄的多普勒标准。使用这些标准,多普勒识别颈动脉狭窄的敏感性为97%(对于大于50%的狭窄,敏感性为98%),特异性从84%提高到93%。