Suppr超能文献

重新定义的用于诊断颈动脉狭窄的双功超声标准。

Redefined duplex ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis.

作者信息

Huston J, James E M, Brown R D, Lefsrud R D, Ilstrup D M, Robertson E F, Meyer F B, Hallett J W

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn 55905, USA.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Nov;75(11):1133-40. doi: 10.4065/75.11.1133.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate duplex ultrasonographic criteria for the determination of 50% or more and 70% or more stenosis of the diameter of the internal carotid artery based on conventional angiography in order to align ultrasonographic diagnostic categories with current clinical management schemes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1, 1995, and June 30, 1999, 915 patients underwent both carotid duplex ultrasonography and cerebral angiography within 30 days at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Of these patients, 294 were excluded from this study because of occlusion of one or both of the internal carotid arteries or atypical flow characteristics. In the remaining 621 patients (61 % male, 39% female; mean age, 67.7 years [range, 14-88 years]), 1218 vessels were available for correlation. Several Doppler ultrasonographic velocity variables were compared with the angiographic findings by use of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The primary end point was verification of optimal ultrasonographic criteria to diagnose 70% or more internal carotid artery stenosis. The secondary end point was establishment of threshold values to detect stenosis of 50% or more.

RESULTS

At angiography, 382 patients had internal carotid arteries with 70% or more stenosis. Peak systolic and end diastolic velocities of the internal carotid artery and internal carotid artery:common carotid artery peak systolic velocity ratios were measured. For an internal carotid artery stenosis of 70% or more, a peak systolic velocity of 230 cm/s or more resulted in a sensitivity of 86.4%, a specificity of 90.1%, a positive predictive value of 82.7%, a negative predictive value of 92.3%, and an accuracy of 88.8%. An end diastolic velocity of 70 cm/s or more and an internal carotid artery:common carotid artery ratio of 3.2 or more yielded similar values. For an internal carotid artery stenosis of 50% or more, a peak systolic velocity of 130 cm/s or more resulted in a sensitivity of 92.1 %, a specificity of 89.5%, a positive predictive value of 90.3%, a negative predictive value of 91.3%, and an overall accuracy of 90.8%. An internal carotid artery:common carotid artery ratio of 1.6 or more yielded similar values.

CONCLUSION

In our ultrasonography laboratory, a carotid artery stenosis of 70% or more (for which carotid endarterectomy is typically recommended in symptomatic patients) is diagnosed reliably with the following duplex ultrasonographic criteria: a peak systolic velocity of 230 cm/s or more, an end diastolic velocity of 70 cm/s or more, or an internal carotid artery:common carotid artery ratio of 3.2 or more.

摘要

目的

基于传统血管造影术评估双功超声标准,以确定颈内动脉直径狭窄50%及以上和70%及以上的情况,从而使超声诊断类别与当前临床治疗方案相一致。

患者与方法

1995年1月1日至1999年6月30日期间,915例患者在明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所30天内接受了颈动脉双功超声检查和脑血管造影。其中,294例患者因一侧或双侧颈内动脉闭塞或血流特征不典型而被排除在本研究之外。在其余621例患者(61%为男性,39%为女性;平均年龄67.7岁[范围14 - 88岁])中,有1218条血管可供进行相关性分析。通过使用受试者操作特征曲线分析,将多个多普勒超声速度变量与血管造影结果进行比较。主要终点是验证诊断颈内动脉狭窄70%及以上的最佳超声标准。次要终点是确定检测狭窄50%及以上的阈值。

结果

血管造影显示,382例患者的颈内动脉狭窄70%及以上。测量了颈内动脉的收缩期峰值速度、舒张末期速度以及颈内动脉与颈总动脉收缩期峰值速度比值。对于颈内动脉狭窄70%及以上的情况,收缩期峰值速度230 cm/s及以上时,敏感性为86.4%,特异性为90.1%,阳性预测值为82.7%,阴性预测值为92.3%,准确性为88.8%。舒张末期速度70 cm/s及以上和颈内动脉与颈总动脉比值3.2及以上时,得出类似数值。对于颈内动脉狭窄50%及以上的情况,收缩期峰值速度130 cm/s及以上时,敏感性为92.1%,特异性为89.5%,阳性预测值为90.3%,阴性预测值为91.3%,总体准确性为90.8%。颈内动脉与颈总动脉比值1.6及以上时,得出类似数值。

结论

在我们的超声检查实验室中,对于颈内动脉狭窄70%及以上(有症状患者通常建议行颈动脉内膜切除术),可通过以下双功超声标准可靠诊断:收缩期峰值速度230 cm/s及以上、舒张末期速度70 cm/s及以上或颈内动脉与颈总动脉比值3.2及以上。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验