• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字图像处理伪影模拟与修复体相关的病理特征的影响。

The impact of digital image processing artefacts mimicking pathological features associated with restorations.

机构信息

Medical Physics and Engineering, 1st Floor Bexley Wing, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2011 Aug 26;211(4):167-70. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.676.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.676
PMID:21869791
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Image processing of digital X-ray images is known to have the potential to produce artefacts that may mimic pathology. A study was conducted at a UK dental radiology conference to demonstrate this effect in dentistry.

METHOD

Sixteen digital X-rays of single teeth containing restorations were randomly presented in both unprocessed and processed formats to an auditorium of 42 participants. Participants interactively scored each image on a scale from 1-5 where 1 was definitely no pathology and 5 was definitely pathology. The display conditions were confirmed for each participant using a validated threshold contrast test.

RESULTS

The results show that 52% (81/157) of responses at level 1 for the unprocessed images changed to levels 4 or 5 after image processing.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates the potential for image processing artefacts to mimic pathology particularly at high contrast boundaries and introduces the risk of unnecessary interventions. In order to minimise this risk, it is recommended that for digital radiographs containing pathology relating to high contrast boundaries, non-related high contrast features such as unrelated restorations or tooth/bone margins are also considered to exclude the possibility of artefact. If there is doubt, reference should be made to the unprocessed data.

摘要

背景

已知数字 X 射线图像的图像处理有可能产生模仿病理学的伪影。在英国牙科放射学会议上进行了一项研究,以证明这种效果在牙科中的存在。

方法

将包含修复体的 16 张单个牙齿的数字 X 射线随机以未处理和处理的格式呈现给 42 名参与者的礼堂。参与者在 1-5 的范围内对每张图像进行互动评分,其中 1 表示绝对没有病理学,5 表示绝对有病理学。使用经过验证的阈值对比度测试为每个参与者确认显示条件。

结果

结果表明,在未处理图像中,81/157(52%)的级别 1 反应在图像处理后变为 4 级或 5 级。

结论

这项研究说明了图像处理伪影有可能模仿病理学,特别是在高对比度边界处,并引入了不必要干预的风险。为了最大程度地降低这种风险,建议对于包含与高对比度边界相关的病理学的数字射线照片,还应考虑与无关的高对比度特征,例如无关的修复体或牙齿/骨骼边缘,以排除伪影的可能性。如果有疑问,应参考未处理的数据。

相似文献

1
The impact of digital image processing artefacts mimicking pathological features associated with restorations.数字图像处理伪影模拟与修复体相关的病理特征的影响。
Br Dent J. 2011 Aug 26;211(4):167-70. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.676.
2
Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.不同影像学技术下修复体周围人工性颊侧隐匿性龋的可视性。
Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):197-207. doi: 10.2341/12-158-L. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
3
Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.存储荧光板全景放射照片的自适应后处理能否提供更好的图像质量?自适应处理前后全景放射照片解剖学图像质量的比较。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Jul;77(5):328-333. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1556801. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
4
Guide to Digital Radiographic Imaging.数字放射成像指南
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2015 Sep;43(9):503-11.
5
A digital frame of reference for viewing digital images.用于查看数字图像的数字参考框架。
Br J Radiol. 2001 Jan;74(877):69-72. doi: 10.1259/bjr.74.877.740069.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.传统X线摄影和数字X线摄影检测金属修复牙中牙齿与修复体不匹配的诊断准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jan;113(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
7
A comparison of perceived diagnostic image quality in direct digital panoramic images between standard and advanced external GOP image processing.标准与高级外部 GOP 图像处理下直接数字化全景影像中诊断图像质量的感知比较。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Nov;77(8):560-565. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1618912. Epub 2019 May 30.
8
Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.使用自适应滤波在全景X线摄影中优化曝光并保持图像质量。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(3):229-35. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2015.1100752. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
9
Dental digital radiography.牙科数字放射摄影术。
Tex Dent J. 2002 May;119(5):404-12.
10
Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.数字减影放射成像在人工复发性龋齿检测中的应用
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1992 May;21(2):59-64. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.21.2.1397457.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of enhancement filters of a CMOS system on halo artifact expression at the bone-to-implant interface.CMOS 系统增强滤波器对骨-种植体界面晕影伪影表达的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Feb 21;28(3):161. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05553-1.
2
Automatic detection of image sharpening in maxillofacial radiology.颌面放射学中图像锐化的自动检测
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Aug 19;21(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01777-9.
3
Medical physics 3.0 versus 1.0: A case study in digital radiography quality control.医学物理3.0与1.0对比:数字X射线摄影质量控制的案例研究
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Sep;19(5):694-707. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12425. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
Imaging evaluating of the implant/bone interface-an in vitro radiographic study.种植体/骨界面的影像学评估——一项体外放射学研究
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Jul;46(5):20160296. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160296. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
5
Evaluation of low-contrast perceptibility in dental restorative materials under the influence of ambient light conditions.环境光条件影响下牙科修复材料低对比度可感知性的评估
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(5):20140360. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140360. Epub 2015 Jan 28.