Suppr超能文献

更安全的导尿管:研究导尿管球囊压力和力如何指导设计。

Safer urethral catheters: how study of catheter balloon pressure and force can guide design.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0320, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109(7):1110-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10510.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To better define urethral catheter balloon pressures and extraction forces during traumatic placement and removal of urethral catheters. To help guide design for safer urethral catheters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Measurements of balloon pressure were made upon filling within the urethra vs the bladder. Extraction forces were measured upon removal of a catheter with a filled balloon from the bladder. Models for the bladder and urethra included an ex vivo model (funnel, 'bladder', attached to a 30 F tube, 'urethra') and fresh human male cadavers. The mean (SEM) balloon pressures and extraction forces were calculated.

RESULTS

In the ex vivo model, the mean (SEM) pressures upon filling the balloon with 10 mL were on average three-times higher within the ex vivo'urethra' (177 [6] kPa) vs 'bladder' (59 [2] kPa) across multiple catheter types. In the human cadaver, the mean balloon pressure was 1.9-times higher within the urethra (139 [11] kPa) vs bladder (68 [4] kPa). Balloon pressure increased non-linearly during intraurethral filling of both models, resulting in either balloon rupture (silicone catheters) or 'ballooning' of the neck of the balloon filling port (latex catheters). Removal of a filled balloon per the ex vivo model 'urethra' and cadaveric urethra, similarly required increasing force with greater balloon fill volumes (e.g. 9.34 [0.44] N for 5 mL vs 41.37 [8.01] N for 10 mL balloon volume).

CONCLUSIONS

Iatrogenic complications from improper urethral catheter use is common. Catheter balloon pressures and manual extraction forces associated with urethral injury are significantly greater than those found with normal use. The differences in pressure and force may be incorporated into a safer urethral catheter design, which may significantly reduce iatrogenic urethral injury associated with catheterization.

摘要

目的

更好地定义在创伤性放置和移除尿道导管时尿道导管球囊的压力和拔出力。帮助指导更安全的尿道导管设计。

材料和方法

在尿道内与膀胱内充盈时测量球囊压力。从膀胱中取出充满球囊的导管时测量拔出力。膀胱和尿道模型包括离体模型(漏斗、“膀胱”,连接到 30 F 管、“尿道”)和新鲜的男性人体尸体。计算平均(SEM)球囊压力和拔出力。

结果

在离体模型中,用 10 毫升填充球囊时,平均(SEM)压力在多个导管类型中,在离体“尿道”内平均比在“膀胱”内高三倍(177 [6]千帕)。在人体尸体中,尿道内球囊压力平均比膀胱内高 1.9 倍(139 [11]千帕)。在两个模型的尿道内充盈过程中,球囊压力呈非线性增加,导致球囊破裂(硅胶导管)或球囊充盈端口颈部“气球样”(乳胶导管)。根据离体模型“尿道”和尸体尿道,同样需要随着球囊充盈量的增加而增加力(例如,5 毫升时为 9.34 [0.44] N,10 毫升时为 41.37 [8.01] N)。

结论

由于不正确使用尿道导管引起的医源性并发症很常见。与尿道损伤相关的导管球囊压力和手动拔出力明显大于正常使用时的压力和力。压力和力的差异可能被纳入更安全的尿道导管设计中,这可能会显著减少与导管插入相关的医源性尿道损伤。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验