• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于年龄≥70 岁的男性中的低危前列腺癌:治疗还是不治疗。

Low risk prostate cancer in men ≥ 70 years old: to treat or not to treat.

机构信息

Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, CD 20307, USA.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2013 Aug;31(6):755-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.07.004
PMID:21872499
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Prostate cancer (CaP) in the aging male will become an increasingly important and controversial health care issue. We evaluated the outcomes between a variety of treatments for low-risk CaP in patients 70 years of age and older.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 3,650 men diagnosed with CaP between 1989 and 2009 were identified in the Center for Prostate Disease Research database to be 70 years of age or older at time of diagnosis. Of these patients, 770 men met the D'Amico criteria ([13]) for low-risk disease and were treated with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or watchful waiting. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare clinicopathologic features across treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare biochemical recurrence-free, progression-free, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 770 patient cohort, 194 (25%) chose radical prostatectomy, 252 (33%) chose external beam radiation therapy, and 324 (42%) were initially managed by watchful waiting with 110 (34%) of this subset ultimately undergoing secondary treatment. The median follow-up was 6.4 years. There were no significant differences in distributions of race/ethnicity, number of medical comorbidities, or clinical stage across the treatment groups. Patients managed on watchful waiting without secondary treatment had the poorest overall survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.0001). Additionally, multivariate analysis confirmed this result for watchful waiting without secondary treatment as being a statistically significant predictor of overall mortality (HR 1.938, P = 0.0084).

摘要

目的

老年男性的前列腺癌(CaP)将成为一个日益重要且颇具争议的医疗保健问题。我们评估了各种治疗方法在 70 岁及以上低危 CaP 患者中的疗效。

方法与材料

在前列腺疾病研究中心数据库中,我们共确定了 1989 年至 2009 年间被诊断为 CaP 的 3650 名年龄在 70 岁或以上的男性患者。在这些患者中,770 名符合低危疾病的 D'Amico 标准[13],并接受了根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗或观察等待治疗。使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较了治疗组之间的临床病理特征。Kaplan-Meier 分析用于比较生化无复发生存率、无进展生存率和总生存率。

结果

在 770 名患者队列中,194 名(25%)选择了根治性前列腺切除术,252 名(33%)选择了外照射放疗,324 名(42%)最初接受观察等待治疗,其中 110 名(34%)最终接受了二线治疗。中位随访时间为 6.4 年。在治疗组之间,种族/民族分布、医疗合并症数量或临床分期没有显著差异。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,未接受二线治疗的观察等待组的总生存率最差(P = 0.0001)。此外,多变量分析证实,未接受二线治疗的观察等待是总死亡率的统计学显著预测因素(HR 1.938,P = 0.0084)。

相似文献

1
Low risk prostate cancer in men ≥ 70 years old: to treat or not to treat.对于年龄≥70 岁的男性中的低危前列腺癌:治疗还是不治疗。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Aug;31(6):755-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
2
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.局限性前列腺癌的治疗:根据其自然病程(通常进展相对缓慢),可选择观察等待、手术或放射治疗。
Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8.
3
PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌根治术后生化复发后,前列腺特异抗原(PSA)倍增时间作为临床进展的预测指标。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2001 Jun;76(6):576-81. doi: 10.4065/76.6.576.
4
The Prostate cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial:VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy to watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.前列腺癌干预与观察试验:退伍军人事务部/美国国立癌症研究所/医疗保健研究与质量局合作研究项目#407(PIVOT):一项随机对照试验的设计及基线结果,该试验比较了根治性前列腺切除术与对临床局限性前列腺癌男性进行观察等待的效果。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Jan;30(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
5
Ability of 2 pretreatment risk assessment methods to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy: data from CaPSURE.两种术前风险评估方法预测前列腺癌根治术后复发的能力:来自CaPSURE的数据。
J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1126-31. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155535.25971.de.
6
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
7
Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.根治性前列腺切除术改善了 PSA 时代淋巴结阳性前列腺癌男性的无进展生存期和癌症特异性生存期:一项确认性研究。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1755-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09730.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
8
A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.一项比较早期前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 12;347(11):781-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012794.
9
Temporarily deferred therapy (watchful waiting) for men younger than 70 years and with low-risk localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era.在前列腺特异性抗原时代,对70岁以下且患有低风险局限性前列腺癌的男性进行暂时延迟治疗(观察等待)。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 1;21(21):4001-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.092.
10
Long-term radical prostatectomy outcomes among participants from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Rotterdam.欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)鹿特丹参与者的长期根治性前列腺切除术结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1678-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11367.x. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Latest Data Specifically Focused on Long-Term Oncologic Prognostication for Very Old Adults with Acute Vulnerable Localized Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.聚焦于急性易损性局限性前列腺癌老年患者长期肿瘤预后的最新数据:一项全国性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 15;11(12):3451. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123451.
2
A comparison of the survival outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy in patients over 75 years old with non-metastatic prostate cancer: A Korean multicenter study.比较机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和放疗在非转移性前列腺癌 75 岁以上患者中的生存结局:一项韩国多中心研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Sep;62(5):535-544. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210079. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
How to choose proper local treatment in men aged ≥75 years with cT2 localized prostate cancer?
对于年龄≥75 岁且患有 cT2 局限性前列腺癌的男性,如何选择合适的局部治疗方法?
Cancer Med. 2019 Jul;8(7):3370-3378. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2221. Epub 2019 May 8.
4
Individual and Population Comparisons of Surgery and Radiotherapy Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Using Bayesian Multistate Models.使用贝叶斯多状态模型对前列腺癌的手术和放疗结果进行个体和人群比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e187765. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7765.
5
Evaluation and Management of the Geriatric Urologic Oncology Patient.老年泌尿肿瘤患者的评估与管理
Curr Geriatr Rep. 2015 Mar;4(1):7-15. doi: 10.1007/s13670-014-0106-5.
6
Senescent remodeling of the innate and adaptive immune system in the elderly men with prostate cancer.老年前列腺癌男性患者先天性和适应性免疫系统的衰老重塑
Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2014;2014:478126. doi: 10.1155/2014/478126. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
7
Prostate cancer: can multiparametric MR imaging help identify patients who are candidates for active surveillance?前列腺癌:多参数磁共振成像能否帮助识别适合主动监测的患者?
Radiology. 2013 Jul;268(1):144-52. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121325. Epub 2013 Mar 6.