Traumatic Brain Injury Service, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234–6200, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Dec;26(8):718-27. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr070. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
Evaluation of post-deployment conditions such as post-concussive syndrome (PCS) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) frequently relies upon brief, self-report checklists which are face valid and highly susceptible to potential symptom validity issues such as symptom exaggeration. We investigated the psychometric prope1rties of a 5-item measure of symptom exaggeration (mild brain injury atypical symptoms [mBIAS] scale) embedded in commonly used PCS and PTSD screening instruments in a sample of 403 patients seen in a brain injury clinic at a large military medical center. Exploratory factor analysis, examining measures of posttraumatic stress, post-concussive symptoms, and symptom over-reporting revealed a 6-factor model with the mBIAS scale items representing a unique factor. Analysis of psychometric properties demonstrated that a score of 8 on the mBIAS was optimal for the detection of symptom over-reporting (sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.92) and appears to be the most favorable cut score for interpretive use. The findings provide a strong initial support for the use of the mBIAS in post-deployment populations.
对部署后情况(如脑震荡后综合征(PCS)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD))的评估通常依赖于简短的自我报告清单,这些清单具有表面效度,并且非常容易受到潜在的症状效度问题的影响,例如症状夸大。我们在一个大型军事医疗中心的脑损伤诊所中对 403 名患者进行了研究,调查了嵌入常用 PCS 和 PTSD 筛查工具中的 5 项症状夸大(轻度脑损伤非典型症状[mBIAS]量表)的心理计量学特性。探索性因素分析,检查创伤后应激、脑震荡后症状和症状过度报告的测量结果,揭示了一个 6 因素模型,mBIAS 量表项目代表一个独特的因素。心理计量学特性分析表明,mBIAS 得分为 8 分是检测症状过度报告的最佳得分(敏感性=0.94,特异性=0.92),并且似乎是最有利于解释使用的最佳得分。这些发现为在部署后人群中使用 mBIAS 提供了强有力的初步支持。