Suppr超能文献

颈动脉分叉完全转位:它会是颈动脉内膜切除术期间颅神经损伤的一个额外风险因素吗?

Complete transposition of carotid bifurcation: can it be an additional risk factor of injury to the cranial nerves during carotid endarterectomy?

作者信息

Marcucci Giustino, Accrocca Federico, Gabrielli Roberto, Antonelli Roberto, Giordano Alessandro G, De Vivo Gennaro, Siani Andrea

机构信息

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy. gmarcroma©alice.it

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Nov;13(5):471-4. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2011.272914. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

Abstract

The internal carotid artery (ICA) usually, lies posterolaterally to the external carotid artery (ECA). Sometimes a complete carotid transposition can occur, with the ECA in a lateral position and the ICA on the medial side can occur. Our study evaluated the significance and impact that this anomaly may have on cranial nerve injuries. From January 2008 to November 2010, 296 patients underwent 360 consecutive primary carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedures. During carotid isolation, we detected an unexpected lateral position of the ECA in 11 cases (3.6%). χ(2) analysis and the Student's t-test were used to compare the incidence of cranial nerve injuries between the 11 patients with the lateral ECA who underwent CEA (group A) and 11 randomized patients with a normal bifurcation (group B). Statistical significance was inferred at χ(2)>3.84 and P<0.05. A statistical difference in the incidence of superior laryngeal nerve paralysis was detected between groups A and B (18.1%, 2/11 in group A vs. 0%, 0/11 in group B; χ(2)>3.84; P<0.05). No differences in incidence of injury were detected for the other cranial nerves. A very meticulous mobilization of the ECA and ICA is needed to perform CEA, but superior laryngeal nerve injury can occur despite the use of a safe and meticulous surgical technique.

摘要

颈内动脉(ICA)通常位于颈外动脉(ECA)的后外侧。有时会发生完全性颈动脉转位,即ECA处于外侧位置而ICA在内侧。我们的研究评估了这种异常可能对脑神经损伤产生的意义和影响。从2008年1月至2010年11月,296例患者接受了360例连续的初次颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)。在颈动脉分离过程中,我们在11例(3.6%)患者中检测到ECA意外地处于外侧位置。采用χ²分析和学生t检验比较接受CEA的11例ECA外侧患者(A组)和11例随机选择的分叉正常患者(B组)之间脑神经损伤的发生率。当χ²>3.84且P<0.05时推断具有统计学意义。A组和B组之间检测到喉上神经麻痹发生率存在统计学差异(A组为18.1%,2/11;B组为0%,0/11;χ²>3.84;P<0.05)。其他脑神经损伤发生率未检测到差异。进行CEA需要非常细致地分离ECA和ICA,但尽管采用了安全细致的手术技术,仍可能发生喉上神经损伤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验