Suppr超能文献

无创心输出量:两种不同方法与热稀释法的同步比较

Noninvasive cardiac output: simultaneous comparison of two different methods with thermodilution.

作者信息

Wong D H, Tremper K K, Stemmer E A, O'Connor D, Wilbur S, Zaccari J, Reeves C, Weidoff P, Trujillo R J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, Irvine.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1990 May;72(5):784-92. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199005000-00002.

Abstract

The authors attempted to simultaneously measure cardiac output by thermodilution (COtd), thoracic bioimpedance (CObi), and suprasternal Doppler ultrasound (COdopp) in 68 patients. Subgroups separately compared included patients whose lungs were mechanically ventilated, patients undergoing cardiac surgery, aortic surgery, patients with dysrhythmias, and patients with sepsis. The authors also studied the value of the ventricular ejection time (VET) in evaluating the agreement of CObi and COdopp with COtd. Simultaneous CObi and COtd were available in a total of 56 patients (416 data sets) with an overall correlation coefficient r = 0.61, regression slope (m) of 0.52, intercept (y) of 2.46, and mean (CObi-COtd) difference (bias) of -0.67 +/- 1.72 (SD) l/min. Simultaneous COdopp and COtd were available in 59 patients (446 data sets) with an overall r = 0.51, m of 0.53, y of 2.05, and bias of -0.79 +/- 1.95 l/min. CObi agreed most closely with COtd in patients whose lungs were mechanically ventilated, who had not undergone cardiac or aortic surgery, and with VET difference less than 40 ms (16 patients, 99 data sets; r = 0.74; m = 0.97; y = 0.15; bias = -0.02 +/- 1.53 l/min). COdopp agreed most closely with COtd in patients whose lungs were mechanically ventilated, who had not undergone cardiac or aortic surgery, and in sinus rhythm with VET difference less than 40 ms (10 patients, 45 data sets; r = 0.82; m = 0.98; y = -0.07; bias = -0.82 +/-1.03 l/min). VET by radial artery can help evaluate the reliability of CObi and COdopp.

摘要

作者尝试在68例患者中同时采用热稀释法(COtd)、胸壁生物阻抗法(CObi)和胸骨上多普勒超声法(COdopp)测量心输出量。单独比较的亚组包括接受机械通气的患者、接受心脏手术、主动脉手术的患者、心律失常患者和脓毒症患者。作者还研究了心室射血时间(VET)在评估CObi和COdopp与COtd一致性方面的价值。共有56例患者(416个数据集)可同时获得CObi和COtd,总体相关系数r = 0.61,回归斜率(m)为0.52,截距(y)为2.46,平均(CObi - COtd)差值(偏差)为-0.67±1.72(标准差)l/min。共有59例患者(446个数据集)可同时获得COdopp和COtd,总体r = 0.51,m为0.53,y为2.05,偏差为-0.79±1.95 l/min。在接受机械通气、未接受心脏或主动脉手术且VET差值小于40 ms的患者中,CObi与COtd的一致性最佳(16例患者,99个数据集;r = 0.74;m = 0.97;y = 0.15;偏差 = -0.02±1.53 l/min)。在接受机械通气、未接受心脏或主动脉手术且处于窦性心律且VET差值小于40 ms的患者中,COdopp与COtd的一致性最佳(10例患者,45个数据集;r = 0.82;m = 0.98;y = -0.07;偏差 = -0.82±1.03 l/min)。通过桡动脉测量的VET有助于评估CObi和COdopp 的可靠性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验