• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童保育补贴的使用对儿童保育质量的影响。

The Impact of Child Care Subsidy Use on Child Care Quality.

作者信息

Ryan Rebecca M, Johnson Anna, Rigby Elizabeth, Brooks-Gunn Jeanne

机构信息

Georgetown University.

出版信息

Early Child Res Q. 2011;26(3):320-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.11.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.11.004
PMID:21874092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3160790/
Abstract

In 2008, the federal government allotted $7 billion in child care subsidies to low-income families through the state-administered Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF), now the government's largest child care program (US DHHS, 2008). Although subsidies reduce costs for families and facilitate parental employment, it is unclear how they impact the quality of care families purchase. This study investigates the impact of government subsidization on parents' selection of child care quality using multivariate regression and propensity score matching approaches to account for differential selection into subsidy receipt and care arrangements. Data were drawn from the Child Care Supplement to the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (CCS-FFCWS), conducted in 2002 and 2003 in 14 of the 20 FFCWS cities when focal children were 3 years old (N = 456). Our results indicate that families who used subsidies chose higher quality care than comparable mothers who did not use subsidies, but only because subsidy recipients were more likely to use center-based care. Subgroup analyses revealed that families using subsidies purchased higher-quality home-based care but lower-quality center-based care than comparable non-recipients. Findings suggest that child care subsidies may serve as more than a work support for low-income families by enhancing the quality of nonmaternal care children experience but that this effect is largely attributable to recipients' using formal child care arrangements (versus kith and kin care) more often than non-recipients.

摘要

2008年,联邦政府通过由州政府管理的儿童保育与发展基金(CCDF,现为政府最大的儿童保育项目)向低收入家庭拨出70亿美元的儿童保育补贴(美国卫生与公众服务部,2008年)。尽管补贴降低了家庭成本并促进了父母就业,但补贴如何影响家庭购买的保育质量尚不清楚。本研究使用多元回归和倾向得分匹配方法,以考虑补贴领取和保育安排中的差异选择,调查政府补贴对父母选择儿童保育质量的影响。数据取自《脆弱家庭与儿童福祉研究的儿童保育补充调查》(CCS - FFCWS),该调查于2002年和2003年在20个FFCWS城市中的14个城市进行,当时重点儿童3岁(N = 456)。我们的结果表明,使用补贴的家庭比未使用补贴的可比母亲选择了质量更高的保育服务,但这仅仅是因为补贴领取者更有可能使用基于中心的保育服务。亚组分析显示,与可比的非补贴领取者相比,使用补贴的家庭购买了质量更高但基于中心的保育服务质量较低的家庭保育服务。研究结果表明,儿童保育补贴对低收入家庭而言可能不仅仅是一种工作支持,因为它提高了儿童接受的非母亲照料的质量,但这种效果很大程度上归因于补贴领取者比非领取者更频繁地使用正规儿童保育安排(相对于亲友照料)。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Child Care Subsidy Use on Child Care Quality.儿童保育补贴的使用对儿童保育质量的影响。
Early Child Res Q. 2011;26(3):320-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.11.004.
2
Can We Trust Parental Reports of Child Care Subsidy Receipt?我们能相信家长关于儿童保育补贴领取情况的报告吗?
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013 Jun;35(6):984-993. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.03.005.
3
Child-care subsidies: do they impact the quality of care children experience?儿童保育补贴:它们会影响儿童所经历的保育质量吗?
Child Dev. 2012 Jul-Aug;83(4):1444-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.1780.x. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
4
Childcare Subsidies and Reduced Intimate Partner Violence Victimization: An Unintended Benefit.儿童保育补贴与亲密伴侣暴力受害率降低:一项意外之喜。
J Interpers Violence. 2025 May 1:8862605251336345. doi: 10.1177/08862605251336345.
5
Childcare subsidy receipt and reduced emotional neglect: Examining parents' enhanced self-efficacy as a mediator.儿童保育补贴的领取与减少情感忽视:检验父母增强的自我效能感作为中介变量的作用
Child Abuse Negl. 2025 Jan;159:107184. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107184. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
6
Childcare Type and Quality among Subsidy Recipients with and without Special Needs.有特殊需求和无特殊需求的补贴领取者的儿童保育类型与质量
Infants Young Child. 2018 Apr-Jun;31(2):109-127. doi: 10.1097/IYC.0000000000000116.
7
Preventive Benefits of U.S. Childcare Subsidies in Supervisory Child Neglect.美国儿童保育补贴在预防监管性儿童忽视方面的益处
Child Soc. 2019 Mar;32(2):185-194. doi: 10.1111/chso.12307. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
8
Child-care subsidies and school readiness in kindergarten.儿童保育补贴与幼儿园的入学准备
Child Dev. 2013 Sep-Oct;84(5):1806-22. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12073. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
9
Subsidising artemisinin-based combination therapy in the private retail sector.对私营零售部门基于青蒿素的联合疗法进行补贴。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 9;3(3):CD009926. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009926.pub2.
10
Next steps for federal child care policy.联邦儿童保育政策的后续步骤。
Future Child. 2007 Fall;17(2):73-96. doi: 10.1353/foc.2007.0016.

引用本文的文献

1
The Experiences of Hispanic Mothers of Young Children in Accessing Cross-sector Federal Financial Assistance Programs to Improve Family Self-sufficiency and Well-being.西班牙裔幼儿母亲在获取跨部门联邦财政援助项目以提高家庭自给自足能力和福祉方面的经历。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02493-8.
2
The social determinants of resilience: A conceptual framework to integrate psychological and policy research.韧性的社会决定因素:整合心理和政策研究的概念框架。
Am Psychol. 2024 Nov;79(8):1049-1062. doi: 10.1037/amp0001308.
3
Patterns and predictors of childcare subsidies for children with and without special needs.有特殊需求和无特殊需求儿童的儿童保育补贴模式及预测因素。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018 May;88:218-228. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
4
Childcare Type and Quality among Subsidy Recipients with and without Special Needs.有特殊需求和无特殊需求的补贴领取者的儿童保育类型与质量
Infants Young Child. 2018 Apr-Jun;31(2):109-127. doi: 10.1097/IYC.0000000000000116.
5
Predictors of Public Early Care and Education Use among Children of Low-Income Immigrants.低收入移民子女使用公共早期护理和教育服务的预测因素
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017 Feb;73:24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
6
Unstable and Multiple Child Care Arrangements and Young Children's Behavior.不稳定且多样的儿童照料安排与幼儿行为
Early Child Res Q. 2014;29(4):471-483. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.05.007.
7
Child care subsidies and the school readiness of children of immigrants.儿童保育补贴与移民子女的入学准备情况
Child Dev. 2014 Nov-Dec;85(6):2140-50. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12285. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
8
Child-care subsidies and child-care choices over time.长期来看的儿童保育补贴与儿童保育选择
Child Dev. 2014 Sep-Oct;85(5):1843-51. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12254. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
9
Can We Trust Parental Reports of Child Care Subsidy Receipt?我们能相信家长关于儿童保育补贴领取情况的报告吗?
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013 Jun;35(6):984-993. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.03.005.
10
The Child and Adult Care Food Program and the Nutrition of Preschoolers.儿童与成人护理食品计划及学龄前儿童营养
Early Child Res Q. 2013 Spring;28(2):325-336. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.07.007.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality Child Care Supports the Achievement of Low-Income Children: Direct and Indirect Pathways Through Caregiving and the Home Environment.优质儿童保育支持低收入儿童的学业成就:通过照料和家庭环境的直接和间接途径。
J Appl Dev Psychol. 2007 Sep 1;28(5-6):411-426. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2007.06.010.
2
Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children's development of academic, language, and social skills.幼儿园前教育阶段的课堂质量衡量标准与儿童学业、语言和社交技能的发展
Child Dev. 2008 May-Jun;79(3):732-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01154.x.
3
Child care in poor communities: early learning effects of type, quality, and stability.贫困社区的儿童保育:类型、质量和稳定性对早期学习的影响
Child Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;75(1):47-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00653.x.
4
Modeling the impacts of child care quality on children's preschool cognitive development.模拟儿童保育质量对儿童学前认知发展的影响。
Child Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;74(5):1454-75. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00617.
5
Availability of child care in the United States: a description and analysis of data sources.美国儿童保育服务的可获得性:数据来源的描述与分析
Demography. 2001 May;38(2):299-316. doi: 10.1353/dem.2001.0016.
6
Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores.使用倾向得分从大型数据集中估计因果效应。
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):757-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00064.
7
Sources of selection bias in evaluating social programs: an interpretation of conventional measures and evidence on the effectiveness of matching as a program evaluation method.评估社会项目中选择偏差的来源:对传统测量方法的解读以及关于匹配作为一种项目评估方法有效性的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):13416-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13416.
8
Child care for children in poverty: opportunity or inequity?为贫困儿童提供的儿童保育服务:是机遇还是不平等?
Child Dev. 1994 Apr;65(2 Spec No):472-92.