Ryan Rebecca M, Johnson Anna, Rigby Elizabeth, Brooks-Gunn Jeanne
Georgetown University.
Early Child Res Q. 2011;26(3):320-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.11.004.
In 2008, the federal government allotted $7 billion in child care subsidies to low-income families through the state-administered Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF), now the government's largest child care program (US DHHS, 2008). Although subsidies reduce costs for families and facilitate parental employment, it is unclear how they impact the quality of care families purchase. This study investigates the impact of government subsidization on parents' selection of child care quality using multivariate regression and propensity score matching approaches to account for differential selection into subsidy receipt and care arrangements. Data were drawn from the Child Care Supplement to the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (CCS-FFCWS), conducted in 2002 and 2003 in 14 of the 20 FFCWS cities when focal children were 3 years old (N = 456). Our results indicate that families who used subsidies chose higher quality care than comparable mothers who did not use subsidies, but only because subsidy recipients were more likely to use center-based care. Subgroup analyses revealed that families using subsidies purchased higher-quality home-based care but lower-quality center-based care than comparable non-recipients. Findings suggest that child care subsidies may serve as more than a work support for low-income families by enhancing the quality of nonmaternal care children experience but that this effect is largely attributable to recipients' using formal child care arrangements (versus kith and kin care) more often than non-recipients.
2008年,联邦政府通过由州政府管理的儿童保育与发展基金(CCDF,现为政府最大的儿童保育项目)向低收入家庭拨出70亿美元的儿童保育补贴(美国卫生与公众服务部,2008年)。尽管补贴降低了家庭成本并促进了父母就业,但补贴如何影响家庭购买的保育质量尚不清楚。本研究使用多元回归和倾向得分匹配方法,以考虑补贴领取和保育安排中的差异选择,调查政府补贴对父母选择儿童保育质量的影响。数据取自《脆弱家庭与儿童福祉研究的儿童保育补充调查》(CCS - FFCWS),该调查于2002年和2003年在20个FFCWS城市中的14个城市进行,当时重点儿童3岁(N = 456)。我们的结果表明,使用补贴的家庭比未使用补贴的可比母亲选择了质量更高的保育服务,但这仅仅是因为补贴领取者更有可能使用基于中心的保育服务。亚组分析显示,与可比的非补贴领取者相比,使用补贴的家庭购买了质量更高但基于中心的保育服务质量较低的家庭保育服务。研究结果表明,儿童保育补贴对低收入家庭而言可能不仅仅是一种工作支持,因为它提高了儿童接受的非母亲照料的质量,但这种效果很大程度上归因于补贴领取者比非领取者更频繁地使用正规儿童保育安排(相对于亲友照料)。