Suppr超能文献

双脐血干细胞移植后免疫重建:与非亲缘外周血干细胞移植的比较。

Immune reconstitution after double umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantation: comparison with unrelated peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

机构信息

Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Apr;18(4):565-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.08.018. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

Abstract

Double umbilical cord blood (DUCB) transplantation is an accepted transplantation strategy for patients without suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched donors. However, DUCB transplantation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality because of slow recovery of immunity and a high risk of infection. To define the differences in immune reconstitution between DUCB transplantation and HLA matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation, we performed a detailed, prospective analysis of immune reconstitution in 42 DUCB recipients and 102 filgrastim-mobilized unrelated peripheral blood stem cell recipients. Reconstitution of CD3 T cells was significantly delayed in the DUCB cohort compared with the MUD cohort for 1 to 6 months posttransplantation (P < .001), including naive (CD45RO-) and memory (CD45RO+) CD4 T cells, regulatory (CD4CD25) T cells, and CD8 T cells. In contrast, CD19 B cells recovered more rapidly in the DUCB cohort and numbers remained significantly greater from 3 to 24 months after transplantation (P = .001). CD56CD16 natural killer (NK) cells also recovered more rapidly in DUCB recipients and remained significantly greater from 1 to 24 months after transplantation. B cell activating factor (BAFF) levels were higher in the DUCB cohort at 1 month (P < .001), were similar in both cohorts at 3 and 6 months, and were lower in the DUCB cohort at 12 months (P = .002). BAFF/CD19 B cell ratios were lower in the DUCB cohort at 3 (P = .045), 6 (P = .02), and 12 months (P = .002) after transplantation. DUCB recipients had more infections within the first 100 days after transplantation (P < .001), and there was less chronic graft-versus-host disease (P < .001), but there were no differences in cumulative incidence of relapse, nonrelapse death, progression-free survival, or overall survival between the 2 groups. These results suggest that increased risk of infections is specifically associated with delayed reconstitution of all major T cell subsets, but the increased risk is limited to the first 3 months after DUCB transplantation. There is no increased risk of relapse, suggesting that graft-versus-leukemia activity is maintained. Early reconstitution of B cells and NK cells may, in part, account for these findings.

摘要

双脐血(DUCB)移植是一种被接受的移植策略,适用于没有合适人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配供体的患者。然而,由于免疫恢复缓慢和感染风险高,DUCB 移植与更高的发病率和死亡率相关。为了定义 DUCB 移植与 HLA 匹配无关供体(MUD)移植之间免疫重建的差异,我们对 42 例 DUCB 受者和 102 例粒细胞集落刺激因子动员无关外周血干细胞受者进行了详细的前瞻性免疫重建分析。与 MUD 队列相比,DUCB 队列在移植后 1 至 6 个月内 CD3 T 细胞的重建明显延迟(P <.001),包括幼稚(CD45RO-)和记忆(CD45RO+)CD4 T 细胞、调节性(CD4CD25)T 细胞和 CD8 T 细胞。相比之下,CD19 B 细胞在 DUCB 队列中恢复更快,并且在移植后 3 至 24 个月时仍保持显著更高的水平(P =.001)。CD56CD16 自然杀伤(NK)细胞在 DUCB 受者中的恢复也更快,并且在移植后 1 至 24 个月时仍保持显著更高的水平。在 1 个月时,DUCB 队列中的 B 细胞激活因子(BAFF)水平更高(P <.001),在 3 个月和 6 个月时两组之间相似,在 12 个月时 DUCB 队列中的 BAFF 水平较低(P =.002)。在移植后 3 个月(P =.045)、6 个月(P =.02)和 12 个月(P =.002)时,DUCB 队列中的 BAFF/CD19 B 细胞比值较低。在移植后前 100 天内,DUCB 受者的感染更多(P <.001),慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)较少(P <.001),但两组之间无复发、非复发死亡、无进展生存期或总生存期的累积发生率差异。这些结果表明,所有主要 T 细胞亚群的重建延迟与感染风险增加密切相关,但这种风险仅限于 DUCB 移植后前 3 个月。复发风险没有增加,表明移植物抗白血病活性得到维持。B 细胞和 NK 细胞的早期重建可能部分解释了这些发现。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验