• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双功扫描在颈动脉内膜切除术患者选择中的作用。

Role of duplex scanning in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Farmilo R W, Scott D J, Cole S E, Jeans W D, Horrocks M

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1990 Apr;77(4):388-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770411.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800770411
PMID:2187560
Abstract

A retrospective review of 63 patients undergoing duplex scanning and angiography for suspected carotid artery disease was performed to evaluate the need for routine angiography before carotid endarterectomy. A consultant surgeon (M.H.) made a simulated management decision on the basis of a clinical summary and a duplex scan report. Twenty-four patients were selected for surgery without angiography; duplex scanning had a sensitivity of 100 per cent and a specificity of 90 per cent in the detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. In two cases duplex scanning misdiagnosed a total occlusion as a critical stenosis. Eighteen patients failed to meet the criteria for surgery and were referred for angiography. Twenty-one patients were selected for conservative treatment on the basis of the duplex scan report. Combining the surgical and conservative groups (45 patients), duplex scanning had a sensitivity of 96 per cent and specificity of 95 per cent for the detection of stenosis greater than 50 per cent. In the identification of a total occlusion, duplex scanning had a poor sensitivity of 50 per cent. These results suggest that routine angiography before carotid endarterectomy is unnecessary in selected patients but that a suspected occlusion should be confirmed by angiography.

摘要

对63例因疑似颈动脉疾病而接受双功扫描和血管造影的患者进行了回顾性研究,以评估在颈动脉内膜切除术前行常规血管造影的必要性。一位外科顾问医生(M.H.)根据临床总结和双功扫描报告做出了模拟治疗决策。24例患者未进行血管造影即被选入手术组;双功扫描在检测颈内动脉狭窄方面的敏感性为100%,特异性为90%。在2例病例中,双功扫描将完全闭塞误诊为严重狭窄。18例患者不符合手术标准,被转诊进行血管造影。21例患者根据双功扫描报告被选入保守治疗组。将手术组和保守治疗组合并(共45例患者),双功扫描在检测大于50%的狭窄方面,敏感性为96%,特异性为95%。在识别完全闭塞方面,双功扫描的敏感性较差,为50%。这些结果表明,对于部分患者,在颈动脉内膜切除术前进行常规血管造影是不必要的,但疑似闭塞应由血管造影予以证实。

相似文献

1
Role of duplex scanning in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.双功扫描在颈动脉内膜切除术患者选择中的作用。
Br J Surg. 1990 Apr;77(4):388-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770411.
2
The role of carotid duplex scanning in surgical decision making.
J Vasc Surg. 1985 Jan;2(1):15-25.
3
Symptomatic carotid ischaemic events: safest and most cost effective way of selecting patients for angiography, before carotid endarterectomy.有症状的颈动脉缺血事件:在颈动脉内膜切除术之前,选择患者进行血管造影的最安全且最具成本效益的方法。
BMJ. 1990 Jun 9;300(6738):1485-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6738.1485.
4
Is duplex scanning sufficient evaluation before carotid endarterectomy?在进行颈动脉内膜切除术之前,双功超声扫描评估是否足够?
J Vasc Surg. 1989 Feb;9(2):193-201.
5
The limitations of diagnosis of carotid occlusion by Doppler ultrasound.多普勒超声诊断颈动脉闭塞的局限性。
Ann Surg. 1988 Mar;207(3):315-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198803000-00015.
6
The role of duplex scanning and arteriography before carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study.
J Vasc Surg. 1993 Oct;18(4):673-80; discussion 680-3.
7
Role of arteriography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery disease.动脉造影在颈动脉疾病术前评估中的作用。
Am J Surg. 1991 May;161(5):619-24. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90913-x.
8
Carotid endarterectomy based on duplex scanning without preoperative arteriography.基于双功扫描且无术前动脉造影的颈动脉内膜切除术。
Circulation. 1988 Sep;78(3 Pt 2):I1-5.
9
Colour-coded duplex assessment alone before carotid endarterectomy.仅在颈动脉内膜切除术前行彩色编码双功能超声评估。
Br J Surg. 1996 Sep;83(9):1234-7.
10
Ultrasonic imaging in the diagnosis of carotid vascular disease with attention to operated upon nonangiographic lesions.超声成像在颈动脉血管疾病诊断中的应用,重点关注已手术治疗的非血管造影病变。
Am Surg. 1986 Oct;52(10):532-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Lesion Length on Doppler Velocities Used Routinely to Determine Carotid Stenosis Cross-Sectional Severity.病变长度对常规用于确定颈动脉狭窄横截面严重程度的多普勒速度的影响。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 15;15(10):1259. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101259.
2
A comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with Doppler sonography in the assessment of carotid arterial stenosis.动脉内数字减影血管造影术与多普勒超声检查在评估颈动脉狭窄中的比较。
Ulster Med J. 1996 Nov;65(2):137-41.
3
Accuracy of duplex versus angiography in patients undergoing carotid surgery.
颈动脉手术患者中双功超声与血管造影的准确性比较
J R Soc Med. 1995 Jan;88(1):20-3.
4
Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.磁共振血管造影、双功超声和数字减影血管造影在评估颅外颈内动脉狭窄中的比较。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Dec;57(12):1466-78. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.12.1466.
5
A 5-year review of carotid endarterectomy in a vascular unit using a computerised audit system.使用计算机审计系统对一个血管科进行的5年颈动脉内膜切除术回顾。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Nov;74(6):430-3.