• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用计算机审计系统对一个血管科进行的5年颈动脉内膜切除术回顾。

A 5-year review of carotid endarterectomy in a vascular unit using a computerised audit system.

作者信息

Magee T R, Earnshaw J J, Cole S E, Hayward J K, Baird R N, Horrocks M

机构信息

Vascular Studies Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Nov;74(6):430-3.

PMID:1471842
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2497715/
Abstract

BIPAS, a computerised vascular audit has been used to analyse the results of 203 carotid endarterectomies performed over a 5-year period in a vascular unit. In addition, all but two patients have been followed up with regular duplex scans. The indications and surgical techniques have remained similar over the study period though preoperative carotid arteriography is no longer considered essential and intraoperative monitoring with transcranial Doppler insonation is becoming routine. There were six perioperative deaths and 20 postoperative neurological defects. However, only three survivors had any long-term disability. It was not possible to identify any particular patients at high risk of perioperative stroke, although simultaneous major surgery and significant bilateral carotid endarterectomy seemed to be more hazardous. Routine follow-up using duplex scanning identified patients with late occlusion (5%) and restenosis (8%), but only three patients (1.5%) suffered a late stroke. Once the perioperative hazards of death and permanent stroke (4.4% in this series) have been overcome, carotid endarterectomy provides good protection against subsequent stroke.

摘要

BIPAS是一种计算机化血管审计工具,已用于分析在一个血管科5年期间进行的203例颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。此外,除两名患者外,所有患者均接受了定期双功扫描随访。在研究期间,手术适应症和技术保持相似,尽管术前颈动脉造影不再被认为是必不可少的,并且术中经颅多普勒超声监测正变得常规化。围手术期有6例死亡和20例术后神经功能缺损。然而,只有3名幸存者有任何长期残疾。虽然同期进行大手术和双侧颈动脉内膜切除术似乎更具危险性,但无法确定任何围手术期中风高危的特定患者。使用双功扫描进行的常规随访发现了晚期闭塞(5%)和再狭窄(8%)的患者,但只有3名患者(1.5%)发生了晚期中风。一旦克服了围手术期死亡和永久性中风的风险(本系列中为4.4%),颈动脉内膜切除术可为后续中风提供良好的预防作用。

相似文献

1
A 5-year review of carotid endarterectomy in a vascular unit using a computerised audit system.使用计算机审计系统对一个血管科进行的5年颈动脉内膜切除术回顾。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Nov;74(6):430-3.
2
[Results in microsurgical carotid artery endarterectomy].[显微外科颈动脉内膜切除术的结果]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1989 May 6;119(18):555-60.
3
[Results and role of carotid endarterectomy].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 2000 Jul 25;130(29-30):1062-71.
4
Stroke from carotid endarterectomy: when and how to reduce perioperative stroke rate?颈动脉内膜切除术所致卒中:何时以及如何降低围手术期卒中发生率?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001 Jun;21(6):484-9. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1360.
5
Carotid endarterectomy: early and late results in 161 patients.颈动脉内膜切除术:161例患者的早期和晚期结果
Can J Surg. 1980 Nov;23(6):536-40.
6
[Carotid endarterectomy. Risks and benefits of treatment].[颈动脉内膜切除术。治疗的风险与益处]
Chirurg. 1989 Feb;60(2):104-9.
7
[Intra and postoperative control in carotid surgery].[颈动脉手术的术中及术后控制]
Ann Ital Chir. 1997 Jul-Aug;68(4):483-8.
8
Carotid surgery under cervical block anesthesia. A simple method of heart and brain protection in high risk patients.
Int Angiol. 1989 Apr-Jun;8(2):70-80.
9
[Indications for endarterectomy in asymptomatic stenoses of the internal or common carotid artery--results of the North American ACAS Study].[北美无症状性颈内动脉或颈总动脉狭窄内膜切除术的指征——ACAS研究结果]
Zentralbl Chir. 1996;121(12):1033-5.
10
[Carotid surgery, indications, results and perspectives].[颈动脉手术、适应症、结果与展望]
J Mal Vasc. 1985;10(2):117-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Computerised audit of carotid endarterectomy: audit loopholes closed?颈动脉内膜切除术的计算机化审计:审计漏洞被堵住了吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 Nov;79(6):455-9.
2
Audit of 149 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed by a single surgeon in a district general hospital over a 12-year period.对一名外科医生在一家地区综合医院12年间连续实施的149例颈动脉内膜切除术进行的审计。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996 Jul;78(4):340-4.
3
Should carotid endarterectomy be purchased? Treatment avoids much morbidity.是否应该购买颈动脉内膜切除术?该治疗可避免许多发病率。 (注:此译文在逻辑上稍显奇怪,推测原文中“purchased”可能有误,若改为“performed”,则译文为“是否应该实施颈动脉内膜切除术?该治疗可避免许多发病情况。” )
BMJ. 1995 Feb 4;310(6975):316-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6975.316.

本文引用的文献

1
Carotid endarterectomy and the Javid shunt: the early results of 215 consecutive operations for transient ischaemic attacks.颈动脉内膜切除术与贾维德分流术:215例连续短暂性脑缺血发作手术的早期结果
Br J Surg. 1984 Jan;71(1):53-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710116.
2
"AICLA" controlled trial of aspirin and dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of athero-thrombotic cerebral ischemia.阿司匹林与双嘧达莫用于动脉粥样硬化血栓形成性脑缺血二级预防的“AICLA”对照试验
Stroke. 1983 Jan-Feb;14(1):5-14. doi: 10.1161/01.str.14.1.5.
3
The natural history of diagnosed gallstone disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.有症状和无症状患者中已诊断胆结石疾病的自然病史。
Ann Surg. 1985 Jul;202(1):59-63. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198507000-00009.
4
Auditing the vascular surgical audit.审核血管外科审计。
Br J Surg. 1987 Feb;74(2):98-100. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740208.
5
Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. A perspective on carotid endarterectomy.不要因噎废食。关于颈动脉内膜切除术的一种观点。
J Vasc Surg. 1986 Dec;4(6):543-5.
6
Late results after carotid endarterectomy for amaurosis fugax.短暂性黑蒙性发作行颈动脉内膜剥脱术后的远期结果
J Vasc Surg. 1987 Oct;6(4):333-40.
7
Carotid endarterectomy. Clinical results in a community-based teaching hospital.颈动脉内膜切除术。一家社区教学医院的临床结果。
Stroke. 1988 Nov;19(11):1323-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.11.1323.
8
Variations in surgical practice: welcome diversity of disturbing differences.
Br J Surg. 1988 Jul;75(7):630-1. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750704.
9
United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: interim results. UK-TIA Study Group.英国短暂性脑缺血发作(UK-TIA)阿司匹林试验:中期结果。UK-TIA研究小组。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Jan 30;296(6618):316-20.
10
Single staged carotid and coronary arteries surgery. Indications and results.一期颈动脉和冠状动脉联合手术。适应症及结果。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1989 May-Jun;30(3):407-13.