Farthing M J
St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, England.
Clin Ther. 1990;12 Suppl A:51-62.
Ideas about the optimal composition of oral rehydration solutions (ORS) continue to evolve. A controlled clinical trial is the only way to determine whether a new ORS is superior to an established solution, but attempts have been made to prescreen new ORS in a variety of animal models, most of which involve intestinal perfusion. Most of the work has been performed in the healthy small intestine of rats, either in short segments or in its entirety, or in the diseased small intestine that has been infected with rotavirus or exposed to cholera toxin to induce a secretory state. Despite the marked pathophysiologic differences between these models, the qualitative findings using new and established ORS have been remarkably similar. Overall, these animal models have emphasized the potential benefit of using a hypotonic ORS (osmolality, 240 mosm/kg or less). The optimal sodium concentration has been found to be 50 to 60 mmol/L, and the optimal glucose concentration 90 to 111 mmol/L. These models have also been satisfactorily used to examine the value of glucose polymer and food-based ORS. The findings suggest that for a given substrate load initial osmolality is probably the chief determinant of water absorption, which is substantially greater from the more hypotonic solutions. Results from animal experiments must be interpreted with caution because of their physiologic limitations. Nevertheless, they have provided insight into the physiology of oral rehydration therapy and may be useful in identifying ORS for evaluation by clinical trial.
关于口服补液盐(ORS)的最佳成分的观点仍在不断发展。对照临床试验是确定一种新的ORS是否优于现有溶液的唯一方法,但人们已尝试在多种动物模型中对新的ORS进行预筛选,其中大多数涉及肠道灌注。大多数研究是在大鼠健康的小肠中进行的,无论是短节段还是整个小肠,或者是感染了轮状病毒或接触霍乱毒素以诱导分泌状态的患病小肠。尽管这些模型之间存在明显的病理生理差异,但使用新的和现有的ORS的定性研究结果却非常相似。总体而言,这些动物模型强调了使用低渗ORS(渗透压为240毫摩尔/千克或更低)的潜在益处。已发现最佳钠浓度为50至60毫摩尔/升,最佳葡萄糖浓度为90至111毫摩尔/升。这些模型也已被成功用于研究葡萄糖聚合物和基于食物的ORS的价值。研究结果表明,对于给定的底物负荷,初始渗透压可能是水吸收的主要决定因素,从渗透压更低的溶液中吸收的水要多得多。由于动物实验存在生理局限性,其结果必须谨慎解读。然而,它们为口服补液疗法的生理学提供了见解,可能有助于识别用于临床试验评估的ORS。