Suppr超能文献

[超声引导下细针穿刺。该方法在腹部及腹膜后间隙的局限性]

[Ultrasonically guided fine-needle puncture. The limits of the method in the abdomen and retroperitoneal space].

作者信息

Holtkamp W, Theilmeier A, Droese M, Ebert R, Reis H E

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik I, Franziskushaus Mönchengladbach, Abteilung Gastroenterologie und Stoffwechsel, Universität Göttingen.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1990 May 25;115(21):809-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1065084.

Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound-directed fine-needle biopsy in the differentiation of malignancy or otherwise of structures in the abdomen or retroperitoneal space which look suspicious on ultrasound was evaluated from results in 558 patients (306 men, 252 women). Data from two different centres were used to characterize further the influence of different techniques of puncture, cytopathologists and groups of patients on the validity of the examination. Sensitivity (in the two centres) was 88 and 80%, respectively, specificity 100 and 99%. The validity of the examination was the same at both centres. In both centres the sensitivity was worst for pancreatic tissue, at only 72 and 61% respectively, compared with other organs (e.g. liver, lymph nodes, kidney) (P less than 0.05). Fine-needle biopsy of abdominal and retroperitoneal organs will thus be subject to a not insignificant number of false-negative results of cytological examination.

摘要

通过对558例患者(306例男性,252例女性)的结果进行评估,以确定超声引导下细针穿刺活检在鉴别腹部或腹膜后间隙超声检查中看起来可疑的结构是否为恶性方面的敏感性和特异性。来自两个不同中心的数据被用于进一步表征不同穿刺技术、细胞病理学家和患者群体对检查有效性的影响。(两个中心的)敏感性分别为88%和80%,特异性分别为100%和99%。两个中心的检查有效性相同。在两个中心,胰腺组织的敏感性最差,分别仅为72%和61%,与其他器官(如肝脏、淋巴结、肾脏)相比(P<0.05)。因此,腹部和腹膜后器官的细针穿刺活检在细胞学检查中会出现数量不少的假阴性结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验