Suppr超能文献

远距离视力筛查视力表的历史回顾:哪些该摒弃,哪些该保留,哪些该更新。

A historical review of distance vision screening eye charts: what to toss, what to keep, and what to replace.

作者信息

Chaplin P Kay Nottingham, Bradford Geoffrey E

机构信息

The Good-Lite Company School Health Corporation, Elgin, IL, USA.

出版信息

NASN Sch Nurse. 2011 Jul;26(4):221-8. doi: 10.1177/1942602x11411094.

Abstract

Vision screening protocol and equipment guidelines differ among schools across the United States. Budget cuts are forcing many school nurses to reevaluate their vision screening programs, as well as items in their vision screening toolboxes. School nurses tasked with inventorying those toolboxes to determine which items to toss, keep, or replace are oftentimes perplexed by the copious choices featured in vendor catalogs and websites. For school nurses who want their vision screening toolboxes to include eye charts, national and international eye chart design guidelines are available to help ensure selected eye charts are standardized. A national consensus policy exists that recommends specific eye charts. And, a large body of vision screening literature is available to help school nurses make informed decisions. Current documents suggest that LEA Symbols are appropriate for young children and Sloan Letters are a better choice than "Snellen" charts for older children.

摘要

美国各地学校的视力筛查方案和设备指南各不相同。预算削减迫使许多学校护士重新评估他们的视力筛查项目以及视力筛查工具箱中的物品。负责清点这些工具箱以确定哪些物品该扔掉、保留或更换的学校护士,常常被供应商目录和网站上众多的选择搞得不知所措。对于希望视力筛查工具箱中包含视力表的学校护士,有国家和国际视力表设计指南可帮助确保所选视力表标准化。存在一项全国共识政策,推荐了特定的视力表。而且,有大量视力筛查文献可帮助学校护士做出明智的决定。当前文件表明,LEA符号适用于幼儿,而对于大龄儿童,斯隆字母表比“斯内伦”视力表是更好的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验