• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麻风病皮肤活检临床与组织病理学相关性的局限性。

Limitations of clinico-histopathological correlation of skin biopsies in leprosy.

作者信息

Jha R, Karki S

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.

出版信息

J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2010 Apr;8(1):40-3.

PMID:21879013
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Skin biopsies play an important role in diagnosing and classifying different types of leprosy. The aim of this study was to analyse different histologic types of leprosy, to correlate histopathological diagnosis with clinical diagnosis, to study the uniformity of clinical and histological findings in the diagnosis of leprosy and to evaluate difficulties faced during clinicopathological correlation according to Ridley- Jopling classification due to inadequacy of data provided.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all skin biopsies reported from Department of Pathology of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital from 14 April 2007 to 13 April 2009, for which leprosy was the diagnosis or was strongly suspected on histopathology.

RESULTS

Out of 40 cases included, 33 were males and seven were females. Tuberculoid leprosy was the most common type comprising 23 /40 cases (57.5%). In 18/ 40 cases (45%), clinical diagnosis was leprosy. Only in three, leprosy was classified according to Ridley-Jopling criteria clinically. Thus clinicopathological correlation according to Ridley-Jopling criteria could not be done. Histopathological reporting lacked uniformity too. In 13/40 reports (32.5%), exact location of granuloma, presence or absence of Grenz zone and enroachment of epidermis by granuloma was not mentioned. None mentioned the number and distribution of lymphocytes or relative proportion of epithelioid cells and foamy histiocytes. Results: Out of 40 cases included, 33 were males and seven were females. Tuberculoid leprosy was the most common type comprising 23 /40 cases (57.5%). In 18/ 40 cases (45%), clinical diagnosis was leprosy. Only in three, leprosy was classified according to Ridley-Jopling criteria clinically. Thus clinicopathological correlation according to Ridley-Jopling criteria could not be done. Histopathological reporting lacked uniformity too. In 13/40 reports (32.5%), exact location of granuloma, presence or absence of Grenz zone and enroachment of epidermis by granuloma was not mentioned. None mentioned the number and distribution of lymphocytes or relative proportion of epithelioid cells and foamy histiocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological diagnosis of leprosy did not correlated with clinical diagnosis significantly. Uniformity was not seen in the clinical or histopathological informations provided making it difficult to conduct retrospective clinico pathological correlation.

摘要

背景

皮肤活检在不同类型麻风病的诊断和分类中起着重要作用。本研究的目的是分析麻风病的不同组织学类型,将组织病理学诊断与临床诊断相关联,研究麻风病诊断中临床和组织学发现的一致性,并根据里德利 - 乔普林分类法评估由于所提供数据不足在临床病理关联过程中面临的困难。

方法

这是一项对特里布万大学教学医院病理科2007年4月14日至2009年4月13日报告的所有皮肤活检进行的回顾性研究,这些活检在组织病理学上被诊断为麻风病或高度怀疑为麻风病。

结果

纳入的40例病例中,男性33例,女性7例。结核样型麻风是最常见的类型,占23/40例(57.5%)。18/40例(45%)临床诊断为麻风病。仅3例临床上根据里德利 - 乔普林标准对麻风病进行了分类。因此,无法按照里德利 - 乔普林标准进行临床病理关联。组织病理学报告也缺乏一致性。在13/40份报告(32.5%)中,未提及肉芽肿的确切位置、无颗粒层的有无以及肉芽肿对表皮的侵犯情况。没有一份报告提及淋巴细胞的数量和分布或上皮样细胞与泡沫状组织细胞的相对比例。纳入的40例病例中,男性33例,女性7例。结核样型麻风是最常见的类型,占23/40例(57.5%)。18/40例(45%)临床诊断为麻风病。仅3例临床上根据里德利 - 乔普林标准对麻风病进行了分类。因此,无法按照里德利 - 乔普林标准进行临床病理关联。组织病理学报告也缺乏一致性。在13/40份报告(32.5%)中,未提及肉芽肿的确切位置、无颗粒层的有无以及肉芽肿对表皮的侵犯情况。没有一份报告提及淋巴细胞的数量和分布或上皮样细胞与泡沫状组织细胞的相对比例。

结论

麻风病的组织病理学诊断与临床诊断无显著相关性。所提供的临床或组织病理学信息缺乏一致性,使得进行回顾性临床病理关联变得困难。

相似文献

1
Limitations of clinico-histopathological correlation of skin biopsies in leprosy.麻风病皮肤活检临床与组织病理学相关性的局限性。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2010 Apr;8(1):40-3.
2
Clinical and histopathological correlation in the classification of leprosy.麻风病分类中的临床与组织病理学相关性
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1993 Sep;61(3):433-8.
3
Significance of histopathological classification in leprosy.麻风病组织病理学分类的意义。
Indian J Lepr. 1999 Jul-Sep;71(3):325-32.
4
Clinicohistopathological concordance in leprosy - a clinical, histopathological and bacteriological study of 100 cases.麻风病的临床组织病理学一致性——100例病例的临床、组织病理学及细菌学研究
Indian J Lepr. 2012 Jul-Sep;84(3):217-25.
5
A clinico-pathological study of macular lesions in leprosy.麻风病黄斑病变的临床病理研究
Indian J Lepr. 1994 Oct-Dec;66(4):435-42.
6
Correlation of Clinico-pathological Classification of Hansen's Disease in a South Indian City.印度南部一座城市中麻风病临床病理分类的相关性
Indian J Lepr. 2014 Oct-Dec;86(4):147-54.
7
Leprosy classification methods: a comparative study in a referral center in Brazil.麻风病分类方法:巴西一家转诊中心的比较研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;45:118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
8
[Analysis of inter and intrapathologist concordance and discordance in a comparative study of the Madrid and Ridley-Jopling classifications of leprosy].[麻风病马德里分类法与里德利-乔普林分类法比较研究中病理学家间及病理学家内部一致性和不一致性分析]
Acta Leprol. 1982 Oct-Dec(89):17-26.
9
[Difficulties in the use of the Ridley and Jopling classification--a morphological analysis].
Hansenol Int. 1989 Dec;14(2):101-6.
10
Histopathological examination of skin biopsies from an epidemiological study of leprosy in northern Malawi.对马拉维北部麻风病流行病学研究中皮肤活检样本的组织病理学检查。
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1987 Mar;55(1):88-98.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dermlep Study Part 2: Results of a Nation-Wide Survey of Dermatologists' Access to Quality Leprosy Services at their Clinics and Hospitals in India.Dermlep研究第二部分:印度皮肤科医生在其诊所和医院获取优质麻风病服务情况的全国性调查结果。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2020 Nov 8;11(6):895-903. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_668_20. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
2
Clinico-Histopathological Spectrum of Infectious Granulomatous Dermatoses in Western India- A Representative Study from Mumbai.印度西部感染性肉芽肿性皮肤病的临床组织病理学谱——来自孟买的一项代表性研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):EC10-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16459.7568. Epub 2016 Apr 1.