Lūse Agita
Communication Studies Department, Riga Stradiņs University, Latvia.
Hist Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;22(85 Pt 1):20-39. doi: 10.1177/0957154X09351045.
The paper explores psychiatry's responses to the twentieth-century socio-political currents in Latvia by focusing on social objectives, clinical ideologies, and institutional contexts of Soviet mental health care. The tradition of German biological psychiatry in which Baltic psychiatrists had been trained blended well with the materialistic monism of Soviet psychoneurology. Pavlov's teaching of the second signal system was well suited to Soviet ideological needs: speech stimuli were seen as a vehicle for moulding the individual's mind. The transformation in diagnostic practices during the 1970s and 1980s reflected the demise of optimism about the capacity of the self to model itself to the needs of the society. Latvian psychiatry was prepared to embrace more individualistic and pessimistic theories of the self.
本文通过关注苏联精神卫生保健的社会目标、临床意识形态和机构背景,探讨了拉脱维亚精神病学对20世纪社会政治潮流的反应。波罗的海精神病学家接受培训时所采用的德国生物精神病学传统,与苏联精神神经学的唯物主义一元论很好地融合在一起。巴甫洛夫的第二信号系统学说非常适合苏联的意识形态需求:言语刺激被视为塑造个体思想的一种手段。20世纪70年代和80年代诊断实践的转变,反映出对自我根据社会需求塑造自身能力的乐观态度的消逝。拉脱维亚精神病学准备接受更具个人主义和悲观色彩的自我理论。