Kumar Geetha, Faden Justin, Steer Robert A
Department of Psychiatry, School of Osteopathic Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Stratford, NJ 08084-1391, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2011 Jun;108(3):815-24. doi: 10.2466/03.05.09.13.15.PR0.108.3.815-824.
The purpose was to assess the effectiveness of the adult ADHD Module from the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales: Screening Version DSM-IV ADHD Symptoms Total Scale (CAARS-S:SV) in screening for attention-deficit/hyperactivity (ADHD) disorder in patients hospitalized for other psychiatric disorders. Assessment measures were administered to 55 (50%) female and 55 (50%) male adult (>18 yr. old) inpatients. Only six (5%) of the 110 inpatients had been diagnosed with comorbid ADHD according to medical charts. In contrast, 55 (50%) patients met criteria for ADHD according to the MINI, and 39 (36%) patients met criteria on the CAARS-S:SV. The higher rates of prevalence for the MINI and the CAARS-S:SV were attributable to symptom criteria for ADHD being similar to those shared with comorbid disorders.
目的是评估《迷你国际神经精神访谈》(MINI)中的成人注意力缺陷多动障碍模块以及《康纳斯成人注意力缺陷多动障碍评定量表:筛查版DSM-IV注意力缺陷多动障碍症状总量表》(CAARS-S:SV)在筛查因其他精神障碍住院患者的注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)方面的有效性。对110名成年(>18岁)住院患者进行了评估测量,其中55名(50%)为女性,55名(50%)为男性。根据病历,110名住院患者中只有6名(5%)被诊断为合并ADHD。相比之下,根据MINI,55名(50%)患者符合ADHD标准,根据CAARS-S:SV,39名(36%)患者符合标准。MINI和CAARS-S:SV较高的患病率归因于ADHD的症状标准与合并症共有的症状标准相似。