• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较经上腔静脉置管和经股静脉置管获得的中心静脉压和静脉血氧饱和度:两者数据不可互换。

Comparison of central venous pressure and venous oxygen saturation from venous catheters placed in the superior vena cava or via a femoral vein: the numbers are not interchangeable.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Resusc. 2011 Sep;13(3):151-5.

PMID:21880001
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare venous pressure and haemoglobin oxygen saturation measured from a catheter in the superior vena cava (SVC) with a catheter inserted via the femoral vein, and to assess the agreement of these measurements. To assess the effect of intra-abdominal pressure and intrathoracic pressures on these measurements.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective study of patients in an adult intensive care unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Central venous pressure (CVP), femoral venous pressure (FVP), venous haemoglobin oxygen saturation in the SVC (SO₂C) and via the femoral vein (SO₂F), agreement between these measures using the Bland-Altman method, and the effect of intra-abdominal pressure and intrathoracic pressure.

RESULTS

43 patients were included; the mean bias for FVP -CVP was 1.05 mmHg (95% CI, 0.30-1.79 mmHg), with limits of agreement of -3.79 to 5.89 mmHg (95% CI, -5.08 to 7.18 mmHg). The bias for SO₂F -SO₂C was -3.21 (95% CI, -6.33 to -0.10), with limits of agreement of -22.43 to 16.01 (95% CI, -27.81 to 21.39). Intra-abdominal pressure had a significant (P < 0.01) effect on both the FVP and on the difference (FVP -CVP).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates poor agreement between CVP and FVP and between SO₂C and SO₂F and that the measurements taken from these two sites are not interchangeable clinically.

摘要

目的

比较经上腔静脉(SVC)导管与经股静脉导管测量的静脉压和血红蛋白氧饱和度,并评估这些测量值的一致性。评估腹内压和胸内压对这些测量值的影响。

设计、地点和参与者:澳大利亚墨尔本阿尔弗雷德医院成人重症监护病房的前瞻性研究。

主要观察指标

中心静脉压(CVP)、股静脉压(FVP)、SVC 内静脉血氧饱和度(SO₂C)和股静脉内血氧饱和度(SO₂F), Bland-Altman 法评估这些指标的一致性,以及腹内压和胸内压的影响。

结果

纳入 43 例患者;FVP-CVP 的平均偏差为 1.05mmHg(95%CI,0.30-1.79mmHg),一致性界限为-3.79 至 5.89mmHg(95%CI,-5.08 至 7.18mmHg)。SO₂F-SO₂C 的偏差为-3.21(95%CI,-6.33 至-0.10),一致性界限为-22.43 至 16.01(95%CI,-27.81 至 21.39)。腹内压对 FVP 和 FVP-CVP 差值均有显著影响(P<0.01)。

结论

本研究表明 CVP 和 FVP 之间以及 SO₂C 和 SO₂F 之间的一致性较差,这两个部位的测量值在临床上不能互换。

相似文献

1
Comparison of central venous pressure and venous oxygen saturation from venous catheters placed in the superior vena cava or via a femoral vein: the numbers are not interchangeable.比较经上腔静脉置管和经股静脉置管获得的中心静脉压和静脉血氧饱和度:两者数据不可互换。
Crit Care Resusc. 2011 Sep;13(3):151-5.
2
Low inferior vena caval catheters for hemodynamic and pulmonary function monitoring in pediatric critical care patients.用于儿科重症监护患者血流动力学和肺功能监测的低位下腔静脉导管
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;5(1):14-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000102383.07075.97.
3
Estimation of central venous pressure using inferior vena caval pressure from a femoral endovascular cooling catheter.使用股血管内置式冷却导管测量下腔静脉压力来估算中心静脉压。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):240-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
4
Femoral venous oxygen saturation is no surrogate for central venous oxygen saturation.股静脉血氧饱和度不能替代中心静脉血氧饱和度。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):3196-201. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182657591.
5
The role of femoral venous pressure and femoral venous oxygen saturation in the setting of intra-abdominal hypertension: a pig model.腹腔内高压情况下股静脉压和股静脉血氧饱和度的作用:猪模型研究。
Shock. 2011 Apr;35(4):422-7. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181fddf45.
6
Inferior vena cava pressure as an estimate of central venous pressure.下腔静脉压力作为中心静脉压的一种估计指标。
J Paediatr Child Health. 1995 Oct;31(5):399-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1995.tb00846.x.
7
Inferior vena caval pressure reliably predicts right atrial pressure in pediatric cardiac surgical patients.下腔静脉压力可可靠地预测小儿心脏手术患者的右心房压力。
Crit Care Med. 1994 Feb;22(2):219-24. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199402000-00011.
8
Effect of catheter site on the agreement of peripheral and central venous pressure measurements in neurosurgical patients.导管置入部位对神经外科患者外周静脉压与中心静脉压测量一致性的影响。
J Clin Anesth. 2005 Aug;17(5):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.08.015.
9
Comparison of central venous to mixed venous oxygen saturation in patients with low cardiac index and filling pressures after coronary artery surgery.冠状动脉搭桥术后心排血量低且充盈压异常患者中心静脉血氧饱和度与混合静脉血氧饱和度的比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008 Feb;22(1):77-83. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.02.010. Epub 2007 May 7.
10
Iliac venous pressure estimates central venous pressure after laparotomy.
J Surg Res. 2014 Sep;191(1):203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.08.022. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Central venous catheter malposition due to dialysis catheter: a case report.透析导管导致中心静脉导管位置异常:一例病例报告。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Oct;69(5):532-534. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.5.532. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
2
Is venous blood drawn from femoral access adequate to estimate the central venous oxygen saturation and arterial lactate levels in critically ill patients?从股静脉穿刺获取的静脉血是否足以用于评估重症患者的中心静脉血氧饱和度和动脉血乳酸水平?
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2015 Oct-Dec;27(4):340-6. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20150058.
3
Use of femoral vein catheters for the assessment of perfusion parameters.
使用股静脉导管评估灌注参数。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2013 Apr-Jun;25(2):168-74. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20130029.