Intensive Care Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Crit Care Resusc. 2011 Sep;13(3):151-5.
To compare venous pressure and haemoglobin oxygen saturation measured from a catheter in the superior vena cava (SVC) with a catheter inserted via the femoral vein, and to assess the agreement of these measurements. To assess the effect of intra-abdominal pressure and intrathoracic pressures on these measurements.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective study of patients in an adult intensive care unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Central venous pressure (CVP), femoral venous pressure (FVP), venous haemoglobin oxygen saturation in the SVC (SO₂C) and via the femoral vein (SO₂F), agreement between these measures using the Bland-Altman method, and the effect of intra-abdominal pressure and intrathoracic pressure.
43 patients were included; the mean bias for FVP -CVP was 1.05 mmHg (95% CI, 0.30-1.79 mmHg), with limits of agreement of -3.79 to 5.89 mmHg (95% CI, -5.08 to 7.18 mmHg). The bias for SO₂F -SO₂C was -3.21 (95% CI, -6.33 to -0.10), with limits of agreement of -22.43 to 16.01 (95% CI, -27.81 to 21.39). Intra-abdominal pressure had a significant (P < 0.01) effect on both the FVP and on the difference (FVP -CVP).
This study demonstrates poor agreement between CVP and FVP and between SO₂C and SO₂F and that the measurements taken from these two sites are not interchangeable clinically.
比较经上腔静脉(SVC)导管与经股静脉导管测量的静脉压和血红蛋白氧饱和度,并评估这些测量值的一致性。评估腹内压和胸内压对这些测量值的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:澳大利亚墨尔本阿尔弗雷德医院成人重症监护病房的前瞻性研究。
中心静脉压(CVP)、股静脉压(FVP)、SVC 内静脉血氧饱和度(SO₂C)和股静脉内血氧饱和度(SO₂F), Bland-Altman 法评估这些指标的一致性,以及腹内压和胸内压的影响。
纳入 43 例患者;FVP-CVP 的平均偏差为 1.05mmHg(95%CI,0.30-1.79mmHg),一致性界限为-3.79 至 5.89mmHg(95%CI,-5.08 至 7.18mmHg)。SO₂F-SO₂C 的偏差为-3.21(95%CI,-6.33 至-0.10),一致性界限为-22.43 至 16.01(95%CI,-27.81 至 21.39)。腹内压对 FVP 和 FVP-CVP 差值均有显著影响(P<0.01)。
本研究表明 CVP 和 FVP 之间以及 SO₂C 和 SO₂F 之间的一致性较差,这两个部位的测量值在临床上不能互换。