Suppr超能文献

依普罗沙坦的降压效果和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Antihypertensive effects and safety of eprosartan: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Company of Anesthesiology, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai 200433, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Feb;68(2):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1107-3. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The benefits of reducing blood pressure (BP) have been well established, but uncertainty remains about the comparative effects of different BP-lowering regimens. We aimed to estimate the efficacy and the tolerability of eprosartan compared with other agents as monotherapy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the criteria was performed using Review Manager and Stata/SE.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles were ultimately included out of 78 studies, involving 6,460 patients. Eprosartan had a greater systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction than placebo [weighted mean difference (WMD): 6.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.86-8.25] and losartan (WMD: 2.24, 95% CI 0.08-4.40) and a greater diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction than placebo (WMD 3.95, 95% CI 2.77-5.13). Therapeutic response rate of BP favored eprosartan [risk ratio (RR) 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24] compared with enalapril. There were no statistical differences in SBP or DBP reductions comparing eprosartan with enalapril or telmisartan. Original RCTs included comparing eprosartan with valsartan and nitrendipine reported no differences in BP-lowering efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Eprosartan monotherapy is equivalent to many first-line antihypertensive agents and is effective for the treatment of essential hypertension, especially for isolated systolic hypertension. The favorable efficacy and tolerability make eprosartan worthwhile to be taken into consideration by physicians.

摘要

目的

降低血压(BP)的益处已得到充分证实,但不同降压方案的相对效果仍存在不确定性。我们旨在评估依普罗沙坦作为单药治疗与其他药物相比的疗效和耐受性。

方法

检索 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 以获取相关研究。使用 Review Manager 和 Stata/SE 对符合标准的随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。

结果

最终纳入了 78 项研究中的 22 篇文章,涉及 6460 名患者。与安慰剂相比,依普罗沙坦具有更大的收缩压(SBP)降低效果[加权均数差(WMD):6.55,95%置信区间(CI)4.86-8.25]和氯沙坦(WMD:2.24,95%CI 0.08-4.40),且具有更大的舒张压(DBP)降低效果[WMD 3.95,95%CI 2.77-5.13]。与依那普利相比,依普罗沙坦的降压治疗反应率更高[风险比(RR)1.13,95%CI 1.03-1.24]。与依那普利或替米沙坦相比,SBP 或 DBP 的降低效果没有统计学差异。比较依普罗沙坦与缬沙坦和硝苯地平的原始 RCT 报告称,降压疗效无差异。

结论

依普罗沙坦单药治疗与许多一线抗高血压药物等效,对治疗原发性高血压有效,特别是对单纯收缩期高血压。良好的疗效和耐受性使依普罗沙坦值得医生考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验