• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本高血压患者中血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂的比较疗效——系统评价与网状Meta分析

Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan - Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Nakajima Tadashi, Oh Akinori, Saita Shun, Yoshida Takuo, Ohishi Mitsuru, Nishigaki Nobuhiro

机构信息

Japan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited Tokyo Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Hypertension, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University Kagoshima Japan.

出版信息

Circ Rep. 2020 Sep 18;2(10):576-586. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0076.

DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0076
PMID:33693183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7932820/
Abstract

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used for the management of hypertension in Japan; however, comparative efficacy data within the ARB drug class remain limited. This systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) indexed in PubMed and Ichushi in Japanese patients with hypertension receiving ARB monotherapy (azilsartan, candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan potassium, olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan, valsartan) in at least 1 arm. Of 763 RCTs identified, 77 met the eligibility criteria; of which, 37 reported mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline in the office setting and were used to construct the network. A fixed-effects model (FEM) showed the effect of each drug vs. the reference, azilsartan. Using the FEM, the mean (95% credible interval) change from baseline in SBP/DBP for candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan potassium, olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan, and valsartan was 3.8 (2.9-4.8)/2.6 (2.0-3.1), 4.8 (2.0-7.5)/3.7 (1.8-5.6), 3.0 (0.8-5.1)/1.9 (0.5-3.3), 3.2 (1.2-5.1)/2.7 (1.3-4.1), 3.2 (0.8-5.6)/2.0 (0.3-3.6), and 3.1 (1.1-5.1)/2.4 (1.1-3.8) mmHg, respectively. The results of this meta-analysis provide evidence that azilsartan has a more favorable efficacy profile than the other ARBs in reducing SBP and DBP.

摘要

在日本,血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARBs)被广泛用于治疗高血压;然而,ARB药物类别内的比较疗效数据仍然有限。本系统文献综述检索了在PubMed和日文版《医学中央杂志》(Ichushi)上索引的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验涉及至少一组接受ARB单药治疗(阿齐沙坦、坎地沙坦酯、厄贝沙坦、氯沙坦钾、奥美沙坦酯、替米沙坦、缬沙坦)的日本高血压患者。在识别出的763项RCT中,77项符合纳入标准;其中,37项报告了诊室环境下收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)相对于基线的平均变化,并被用于构建网络。固定效应模型(FEM)显示了每种药物相对于对照药物阿齐沙坦的效果。使用FEM,坎地沙坦酯、厄贝沙坦、氯沙坦钾、奥美沙坦酯、替米沙坦和缬沙坦相对于基线的SBP/DBP平均变化(95%可信区间)分别为3.8(2.9 - 4.8)/2.6(2.0 - 3.1)、4.8(2.0 - 7.5)/3.7(1.8 - 5.6)、3.0(0.8 - 5.1)/1.9(0.5 - 3.3)、3.2(1.2 - 5.1)/2.7(1.3 - 4.1)、3.2(0.8 - 5.6)/2.0(0.3 - 3.6)和3.1(1.1 - 5.1)/2.4(1.1 - 3.8)mmHg。这项荟萃分析的结果提供了证据,表明在降低SBP和DBP方面,阿齐沙坦比其他ARB具有更有利的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b37/7932820/ddef7f3318e0/circrep-2-576-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b37/7932820/a0e89582b89c/circrep-2-576-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b37/7932820/7acba56cc3a4/circrep-2-576-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b37/7932820/a8be6d028617/circrep-2-576-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b37/7932820/ddef7f3318e0/circrep-2-576-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b37/7932820/a0e89582b89c/circrep-2-576-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b37/7932820/7acba56cc3a4/circrep-2-576-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b37/7932820/a8be6d028617/circrep-2-576-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b37/7932820/ddef7f3318e0/circrep-2-576-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan - Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.日本高血压患者中血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂的比较疗效——系统评价与网状Meta分析
Circ Rep. 2020 Sep 18;2(10):576-586. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0076.
2
Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.新型血管紧张素受体阻滞剂阿齐沙坦酯的降压疗效是否优于老一代药物?系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 May;23(5):901-914. doi: 10.1111/jch.14227. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
3
Valsartan vs. other angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analytical approach.缬沙坦与其他血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂治疗高血压的比较:一项荟萃分析方法。
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 May;63(5):766-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02028.x.
4
Antihypertensive effects of olmesartan compared with other angiotensin receptor blockers: a meta-analysis.奥美沙坦与其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的降压效果比较:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2012 Oct 1;12(5):335-44. doi: 10.1007/BF03261842.
5
Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan.使用24小时动态血压监测评估降压疗效:奥美沙坦酯、氯沙坦钾、缬沙坦和厄贝沙坦的比较
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5(1):41-50. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505010-00006.
6
Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension.血管紧张素II(AT1)受体阻滞剂在高血压治疗中的临床药代动力学
J Hum Hypertens. 2000 Apr;14 Suppl 1:S73-86. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000991.
7
Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.在 1 期和 2 期高血压患者中,血管紧张素受体阻断剂阿齐沙坦酯与奥美沙坦和缬沙坦对动态血压和诊室血压的影响。
Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
8
Comparative efficacy and safety of six angiotensin II receptor blockers in hypertensive patients: a network meta-analysis.六种血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂治疗高血压患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项网络荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1034-1043. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01755-5. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
9
A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of Azilsartan Medoxomil Compared to Other Anti-hypertensives Efficacy in Lowering Blood Pressure Amongst Mild to Moderate Hypertensive Patients.一项关于阿齐沙坦酯与其他抗高血压药物在降低轻中度高血压患者血压方面疗效的系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Dec;41(12):4498-4517. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02997-5. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
10
The velocity of antihypertensive effects of seven angiotensin II receptor blockers determined by home blood pressure measurements.通过家庭血压测量确定的七种血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂的降压作用速度。
J Hypertens. 2016 Jun;34(6):1218-23. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000902.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of Azilsartan Medoxomil Compared to Other Anti-hypertensives Efficacy in Lowering Blood Pressure Amongst Mild to Moderate Hypertensive Patients.一项关于阿齐沙坦酯与其他抗高血压药物在降低轻中度高血压患者血压方面疗效的系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Dec;41(12):4498-4517. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02997-5. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of six angiotensin II receptor blockers in hypertensive patients: a network meta-analysis.六种血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂治疗高血压患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项网络荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1034-1043. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01755-5. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).日本高血压学会高血压管理指南(JSH 2019)。
Hypertens Res. 2019 Sep;42(9):1235-1481. doi: 10.1038/s41440-019-0284-9.
2
Viewpoint on Guidelines for Treatment of Hypertension in Japan.日本高血压治疗指南观点
Circ Res. 2019 Mar 29;124(7):981-983. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.314991.
3
Analysis of antihypertensive treatment using real-world Japanese data-the retrospective study of antihypertensives for lowering blood pressure (REAL) study.
Effect of Azilsartan on clinical blood pressure reduction compared to other angiotensin receptor blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
与其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂相比,阿齐沙坦降低临床血压的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Dec 8;86(2):958-967. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001547. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Beneficial Effects of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Mortality in Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Study from 2019 to 2020 in China.血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂对 COVID-19 患者死亡率的有益影响:2019 年至 2020 年中国的一项回顾性研究。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025 Feb;39(1):63-74. doi: 10.1007/s10557-023-07494-5. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
5
Different Doses of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared with Olmesartan in Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不同剂量沙库巴曲缬沙坦与奥美沙坦治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023 May;30(3):207-218. doi: 10.1007/s40292-023-00572-7. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
6
Comparative efficacy and safety of fimasartan in patients with hypertension: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.在高血压患者中,非马沙坦的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Aug;24(8):971-983. doi: 10.1111/jch.14536. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
7
Efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan versus olmesartan in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对比奥美沙坦治疗日本原发性高血压患者的疗效:一项随机、双盲、多中心研究。
Hypertens Res. 2022 May;45(5):824-833. doi: 10.1038/s41440-021-00819-7. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
使用真实世界日本数据的降压治疗分析——降压药物的回顾性研究(REAL 研究)。
Hypertens Res. 2019 Jul;42(7):1057-1067. doi: 10.1038/s41440-019-0238-2. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
4
Keep Blood Pressure Low, but Not Too Much….保持血压低,但不要过低……
Circ Res. 2018 Nov 9;123(11):1205-1207. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314017.
5
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
6
Antihypertensive effect of azilsartan versus olmesartan in patients with essential hypertension: a meta-analysis.阿齐沙坦与奥美沙坦对原发性高血压患者的降压效果:一项荟萃分析。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):481-488. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1859-1. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
The trends in total energy, macronutrients and sodium intake among Japanese: findings from the 1995-2016 National Health and Nutrition Survey.日本人的总能量、宏量营养素和钠摄入量的变化趋势:1995-2016 年全国健康和营养调查的结果。
Br J Nutr. 2018 Aug;120(4):424-434. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518001162. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
8
Network meta-analysis: the highest level of medical evidence?网状Meta分析:医学证据的最高级别?
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Apr;23(2):56-59. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110887. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Comparative Efficacy of Angiotensin II Antagonists in Essential Hypertension: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.血管紧张素II拮抗剂治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Jun;27(6):666-682. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.721. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
10
Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians.网状Meta分析:临床医生指南
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;12(1):103-111. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1583-7. Epub 2016 Dec 2.