Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan.
Jpn J Radiol. 2011 Aug;29(7):457-65. doi: 10.1007/s11604-011-0579-5. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
We evaluated low-contrast injection protocols for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) using a 64-detector scanner and the test bolus technique.
We randomly assigned 60 patients undergoing coronary CTA to one of two contrast material (CM) injection protocols. For the low-contrast dose protocol (P(low)), the patients received injections of iohexol-350 [0.7 ml/kg body weight (BW)] during 9 s, and the test-bolus technique was used. Under the conventional protocol (P(conv)), they received iohexol-350 (1.0 ml/kg BW) during 15 s, and bolus tracking was used. We compared the protocols for attenuation values in the ascending aorta and coronary arteries and for the amount of CM required.
There was no significant difference in the mean CT attenuation of the ascending aorta and coronary arteries between the P(low) and P(conv) groups. The amount of CM was significantly less with P(low) than with P(conv) [49.7 ± 6.4 ml (main bolus: 39.7 ± 6.4 ml) vs. 57.0 ± 10.1 ml, P < 0.01].
With 64-detector CTA of the heart, the low-dose and short-injection-duration protocol with the test-injection technique provides vessel attenuation comparable to that obtained with the standard-dose protocol with the bolus-tracking technique.
我们使用 64 排探测器 CT 扫描仪和测试团注技术评估冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CTA)的低对比剂注射方案。
我们将 60 例行冠状动脉 CTA 的患者随机分为两种对比剂(CM)注射方案。对于低剂量对比剂方案(P(low)),患者在 9 秒内接受碘海醇 350 [0.7 ml/kg 体重(BW)]注射,并使用测试团注技术。在常规方案(P(conv))下,他们接受碘海醇 350(1.0 ml/kg BW)注射 15 秒,并使用团注追踪技术。我们比较了两种方案在升主动脉和冠状动脉的衰减值以及所需 CM 量方面的差异。
P(low)组和 P(conv)组升主动脉和冠状动脉的平均 CT 衰减值无显著差异。与 P(conv)组相比,P(low)组的 CM 用量明显减少[49.7 ± 6.4 ml(主团注:39.7 ± 6.4 ml)vs. 57.0 ± 10.1 ml,P < 0.01]。
对于 64 排心脏 CTA,使用测试团注技术的低剂量和短注射时间方案可提供与使用团注追踪技术的标准剂量方案相当的血管衰减。