• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[慢性疼痛的药物治疗]

[Pharmacological treatment of chronic pain].

作者信息

Willimann Patrick

机构信息

Schmerzambulatorium, Institut für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsspital Zürich.

出版信息

Ther Umsch. 2011 Sep;68(9):512-6. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000204.

DOI:10.1024/0040-5930/a000204
PMID:21882148
Abstract

The pharmacological treatment of chronic pain differs from acute pain management. In chronic non-cancer pain patients pharmacological treatment is only one element of an interdisciplinary approach. Not pain reduction only but gain in physical and social functioning is mandatory for continuation of therapy. The developpement of a strategy is the most important and difficult step toward an individual and sustained pharmacological pain treatment. Simple practical guidelines can help to find an individual therapeutic straight. Outcome parameters have to be determined. Check-ups for discontinuation of the therapy have to be done periodically. Exact documentation of effect and side effects prevents ungrateful and potential dangerous treatments. The WHO ladder remains the cornerstone of pharmacological pain treatment. Further analgesics as antidepressants and anticonvulsants are important in treatment of neuropathic or mixed pain states. Special considerations have to be done in opioid treatment of non-cancer pain regarding the lack of evidence in long term outcome and possible side effects and risks.

摘要

慢性疼痛的药物治疗不同于急性疼痛的管理。在慢性非癌性疼痛患者中,药物治疗只是多学科方法的一个要素。对于持续治疗而言,不仅要减轻疼痛,而且身体和社会功能的改善也是必需的。制定策略是实现个体化和持续药物性疼痛治疗最重要且最困难的一步。简单实用的指南有助于找到个体化的治疗路径。必须确定疗效参数。必须定期进行治疗中断检查。准确记录疗效和副作用可避免无效且可能有危险的治疗。世界卫生组织的三阶梯止痛法仍然是药物性疼痛治疗的基石。其他镇痛药如抗抑郁药和抗惊厥药在神经性或混合性疼痛状态的治疗中很重要。在非癌性疼痛的阿片类药物治疗中,鉴于长期疗效缺乏证据以及可能的副作用和风险,必须进行特殊考量。

相似文献

1
[Pharmacological treatment of chronic pain].[慢性疼痛的药物治疗]
Ther Umsch. 2011 Sep;68(9):512-6. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000204.
2
[Drug therapy of acute and chronic abdominal pain].[急慢性腹痛的药物治疗]
Ther Umsch. 2011 Aug;68(8):435-40. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000189.
3
[Management of chronic pain in cancer patients: practical applications].癌症患者慢性疼痛的管理:实际应用
Rev Mal Respir. 2001 Feb;18(1):79-85.
4
Opioid and adjuvant analgesics: compared and contrasted.阿片类和辅助镇痛药:比较与对比
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011 Aug;28(5):378-83. doi: 10.1177/1049909111410298. Epub 2011 May 26.
5
[Basic pain management care by the family physician].[家庭医生的基本疼痛管理护理]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2007 Jul 19;149(29-30):32-5.
6
Neuropsychological assessment of chronic non-malignant pain patients treated in a multidisciplinary pain centre.在多学科疼痛中心接受治疗的慢性非恶性疼痛患者的神经心理学评估。
Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):453-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.10.005. Epub 2004 Nov 5.
7
[Chronic pain therapy].[慢性疼痛治疗]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2009 Aug 12;98(16):885-91. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157.98.16.885.
8
[Pain therapy in general practice].[全科医疗中的疼痛治疗]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2009 May 13;98(10):513-21. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157.98.10.513.
9
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
10
[Pharmacotherapy in cancer pain management].[癌症疼痛管理中的药物治疗]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2010 Jan;45(1):34-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243377. Epub 2010 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurophysiology of pain and hypnosis for chronic pain.疼痛的神经生理学和慢性疼痛的催眠。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Mar;2(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0084-5.