Henze Darrell A., Urban Mark O.
The humane use of preclinical animal models plays a critical role both in understanding the basic biology of pain as well as in the development of therapeutic treatments to alleviate pain. Clinically relevant pain is the result of complex processes involving peripheral transduction and transmission as well as central modulation and processing that leads to the final conscious sensation of pain. Much has been learned about the mechanisms underlying the transduction and transmission of the pain signal within the nervous system through the use of cellular, biochemical, and molecular techniques (Millan 1999; Scholz and Woolf 2007; Zeilhofer 2005). However, understanding the actual experience of pain will always require an intact organism that can integrate the full range of external stimuli and internal cognitive and emotional states that drive and modulate pain. Rodent models of pain have historically played a dominant role in the study of pain mechanisms (Negus et al. 2006; Walker et al. 1999). There are many good reasons for this, including the practicalities of low cost, simplified ethical concerns, and the scientific value of having a large database of prior research to provide context for new findings. A large historical database is particularly important in the field of drug discovery and development since the sensitivity and predictive validity of animal models can only be established through extensive testing in many contexts. For these reasons, the rat and mouse models will continue to be the workhorses driving basic research as well as drug discovery. Unfortunately, there are many ways that the biology of rodents may fail to accurately predict the biology and pharmacology of clinical pain conditions in humans (Blackburn -Munro 2004; Le Bars et al. 2001). Given the high cost of developing new therapeutics (Adams and Brantner 2006), there is a growing need to validate biological and pharmacological findings in non-rodent species that, while perhaps less tractable than rodents, address known or ill-defined differences between mice and men. It is hoped that through the humane study and evaluation of pain states in higher order preclinical species, we can better predict whether biological mechanisms and specific compounds have relevance for clinical pain. Ultimately, well-validated pain models in non-rodent species could enhance the speed, reduce the costs, and increase the probability of the successful development of new analgesic therapeutics offering enhanced efficacy and reduced adverse effects. This chapter will review the gaps in current pain research using rodent models that may potentially be addressed using preclinical animal models of pain in higher species. Additionally, we will review the pain models and assessments that have been developed to date in “higher” and larger species and highlight areas where there is a need for the development of new models and methods of pain assessment.
人道地使用临床前动物模型,对于理解疼痛的基础生物学以及开发缓解疼痛的治疗方法都起着关键作用。临床相关疼痛是一个复杂过程的结果,该过程涉及外周转导与传递以及中枢调节与处理,最终导致对疼痛的有意识感觉。通过使用细胞、生化和分子技术,人们已经对神经系统内疼痛信号的转导和传递机制有了很多了解(Millan,1999;Scholz和Woolf,2007;Zeilhofer,2005)。然而,要理解疼痛的实际体验,始终需要一个完整的生物体,它能够整合各种外部刺激以及驱动和调节疼痛的内部认知和情绪状态。在疼痛机制的研究中,啮齿动物疼痛模型一直占据主导地位(Negus等人,2006;Walker等人,1999)。这样做有很多充分的理由,包括低成本的实用性、简化的伦理问题,以及拥有大量先前研究数据库可为新发现提供背景的科学价值。在药物发现和开发领域,一个庞大的历史数据库尤为重要,因为动物模型的敏感性和预测有效性只能通过在多种情况下的广泛测试来确立。出于这些原因,大鼠和小鼠模型将继续作为推动基础研究和药物发现的主力军。不幸的是,啮齿动物的生物学特性在很多方面可能无法准确预测人类临床疼痛状况的生物学和药理学特性(Blackburn - Munro,2004;Le Bars等人,2001)。鉴于开发新疗法的成本高昂(Adams和Brantner,2006),越来越需要在非啮齿动物物种中验证生物学和药理学研究结果,这些物种虽然可能比啮齿动物更难处理,但能解决已知的或尚不明确的小鼠与人类之间的差异。希望通过对高级临床前物种疼痛状态进行人道的研究和评估,我们能够更好地预测生物学机制和特定化合物是否与临床疼痛相关。最终,经过充分验证的非啮齿动物物种疼痛模型可以提高新镇痛疗法成功开发的速度、降低成本,并增加其成功开发的概率,这些新疗法具有更高的疗效和更少的副作用。本章将回顾当前使用啮齿动物模型进行疼痛研究中存在的差距,这些差距可能通过使用高等物种的临床前动物疼痛模型来解决。此外,我们将回顾迄今为止在“高等”和较大物种中开发的疼痛模型和评估方法,并强调需要开发新的疼痛模型和评估方法的领域。