Department of Anaesthesia, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66(12):1121-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06884.x. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
We studied the i-gel™ in 120 anaesthetised children (92 boys, 28 girls; median (IQR [range]) age (3 -7 [0.4 -13]) years and weight 19 (15-26 [7-35]) kg) to assess efficacy and usability. Insertion was successful on the first/second/third attempt in 110/8/1 children and failed in one child. Median (IQR [range]) insertion time was 14 (9-16 [6-200]) s. Manual ventilation was possible in all cases, although excess leak precluded a tidal volume above 7 ml.kg(-1) in three children. Fibreoptic inspection through the i-gel revealed a clear view of the vocal cords in 40 out of 46 cases (87%). Median (IQR [range]) leak pressure was 20 (16-26 [8-30]) cmH(2) O. During maintenance of anaesthesia, 16 manipulations were required in 11 children to improve the airway. One child regurgitated without aspirating. Other complications and side effects were infrequent. The i-gel was inserted without complications, establishing a clear airway and enabling spontaneous and controlled ventilation, in 113 (94%) children.
我们研究了 i-gel™ 在 120 名麻醉儿童(92 名男童,28 名女童;中位数(IQR [范围])年龄(3-7 [0.4-13] 岁)和体重 19(15-26 [7-35] 公斤))以评估疗效和可用性。在 110/8/1 名儿童中首次/第二次/第三次尝试插入成功,1 名儿童失败。中位数(IQR [范围])插入时间为 14(9-16 [6-200])秒。所有病例均可行手动通气,但在 3 名儿童中,由于泄漏过多,潮气量无法超过 7 ml.kg(-1)。通过 i-gel 进行纤维光学检查,46 例中有 40 例(87%)可清晰观察声带。中位(IQR [范围])泄漏压力为 20(16-26 [8-30])cmH(2)O。在维持麻醉期间,11 名儿童中有 16 次需要操作以改善气道。一名儿童反流但未吸入。其他并发症和副作用少见。在 113 名(94%)儿童中,i-gel 无并发症地插入,建立了清晰的气道,并能够进行自主和控制通气。