Selvin Caren Candace, Singariya Geeta, Bihani Pooja, Kamal Manoj, Paliwal Naveen, Ujwal Shobha
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr S N Medical College Jodhpur, Jodhpur, India.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, India.
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2023 Jan;18(1):51-56. doi: 10.17085/apm.22209. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
Supraglottic airways (SGA) are increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia.Among SGA, I-gelTM is a commonly used device in pediatric patients. The BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is latest addition in pediatric airway armamentarium. This studywas conducted to compare the clinical performance of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM LMA in pediatric patients.
A total of 140 children aged 1-5 years, who were undergoing elective surgery,were randomized into two groups either I-gelTM (Group I) or BlockbusterTM LMA (Group B). Airway was secured with appropriate-sized LMA according to group allocation under generalanesthesia. The primary objective of study was oropharyngeal leak pressures (OPLP), andsecondary objectives were number of attempts of device insertion, success rate, ease ofLMA insertion, hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidities.
The mean OPLP was significantly higher for I-gelTM compared to BlockbusterTM LMA(27.97 ± 1.65 vs. 26.04 ± 2.12; P < 0.001). The devices were successfully inserted on thefirst attempt in 97.14% and 90% of the Group I and Group B respectively. The insertion time,ease of insertion, hemodynamic parameters and postoperative complications were comparable between groups.
The I-gelTM was more efficacious device in term of OPLP than BlockbusterTMLMA for positive pressure ventilation in pediatric patients undergoing short surgical procedures under general anesthesia.
声门上气道(SGA)在小儿麻醉中的应用日益广泛。在SGA中,I-gelTM是小儿患者常用的器械。BlockbusterTM喉罩气道(LMA)是小儿气道设备中的最新成员。本研究旨在比较I-gelTM和BlockbusterTM LMA在小儿患者中的临床表现。
总共140名年龄在1至5岁接受择期手术的儿童被随机分为两组,即I-gelTM组(I组)或BlockbusterTM LMA组(B组)。在全身麻醉下,根据分组分配使用合适尺寸的LMA确保气道安全。研究的主要目标是口咽漏气压(OPLP),次要目标是器械插入尝试次数、成功率、LMA插入的难易程度、血流动力学参数以及术后咽喉部并发症。
与BlockbusterTM LMA相比,I-gelTM的平均OPLP显著更高(27.97±1.65 vs. 26.04±2.12;P<0.001)。I组和B组分别有97.14%和90%的患者首次尝试时成功插入器械。两组之间的插入时间、插入难易程度、血流动力学参数和术后并发症相当。
在全身麻醉下接受短时间手术的小儿患者中,就OPLP而言,I-gelTM在正压通气方面比BlockbusterTM LMA更有效。