Centre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Cardiovasc Ther. 2012 Oct;30(5):295-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2011.00282.x. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
Urotensin II (UII) is a potent vasoactive peptide that exerts differential effects on heart failure (HF) patients compared to health controls. However, the mechanism of action remains unclear. The role of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) as a mediator of UII in the vasculature has not been explored.
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of UII in the presence and absence of sEH inhibitor AUDA on skin microvessel tone in HF patients and healthy controls using iontophoresis and laser Doppler velocimetry. UII (10(-7) M) and AUDA (10(-10), 10(-7), and 10(-5) M) were administered to the forearm of participants by iontophoresis for 30 seconds. Laser Doppler velocimetry was performed for 5 minutes to measure flux through the subcutaneous blood vessels. Response (flux) was measured for 5 minutes per concentration with 25 continuous scans.
UII increased flux in healthy controls by 39% (P < 0.05) and increased flux in HF patients by 6% (ns). AUDA (10(-10) and 10(-7) M) administration further decreased flux by 115% (P < 0.05) and 255% (P < 0.0001), respectively in healthy controls. In HF patients, AUDA (10(-10), 10(-7), and 10(-5) M) further increased flux by 77% (P < 0.05), 67% (P < 0.01), and 100% (P < 0.05), respectively. AUDA alone at 10(-7) M increased flux in both groups by 31% (healthy controls, P < 0.05) and 36% (HF, P < 0.01).
Taken together, the presence of HF appeared to abrogate the vasodilator responsiveness of sEH inhibitor. These results suggest an important role for both UII and sEH in vascular regulation and that sEH may be involved in mediating UII effects. Furthermore, the study highlights the therapeutic potential of sEH inhibitors for the treatment of HF.
尾加压素 II(UII)是一种具有血管活性的肽,它对心力衰竭(HF)患者的作用与健康对照组不同。然而,其作用机制尚不清楚。可溶性环氧化物水解酶(sEH)作为 UII 在血管中的介质的作用尚未被探索。
本研究旨在通过离子电渗和激光多普勒流速计检查 UII 在存在和不存在 sEH 抑制剂 AUDA 的情况下对 HF 患者和健康对照者皮肤微血管张力的影响。通过离子电渗将 UII(10(-7) M)和 AUDA(10(-10)、10(-7) 和 10(-5) M)施用于参与者的前臂 30 秒。激光多普勒流速计用于测量皮下血管的通量 5 分钟。每个浓度下测量 5 分钟的反应(通量),共 25 个连续扫描。
UII 使健康对照组的通量增加 39%(P < 0.05),HF 患者的通量增加 6%(ns)。AUDA(10(-10) 和 10(-7) M)的给药分别使健康对照组的通量进一步降低 115%(P < 0.05)和 255%(P < 0.0001)。在 HF 患者中,AUDA(10(-10)、10(-7) 和 10(-5) M)分别使通量进一步增加 77%(P < 0.05)、67%(P < 0.01)和 100%(P < 0.05)。AUDA 本身在 10(-7) M 时使两组的通量分别增加 31%(健康对照组,P < 0.05)和 36%(HF,P < 0.01)。
总之,HF 的存在似乎消除了 sEH 抑制剂的血管舒张反应性。这些结果表明 UII 和 sEH 在血管调节中都具有重要作用,并且 sEH 可能参与介导 UII 的作用。此外,该研究强调了 sEH 抑制剂在治疗 HF 中的治疗潜力。