Field Station Fabrikschleichach, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, D-96181 Rauhenebrach, Germany.
Evolution. 2011 Sep;65(9):2461-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01312.x. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
Polymorphic dispersal strategies are found in many plant and animal species. An important question is how the genetic variation underlying such polymorphisms is maintained. Numerous mechanisms have been discussed, including kin competition or frequency-dependent selection. In the context of sympatric speciation events, genetic and phenotypic variation is often assumed to be preserved by assortative mating. Thus, recently, this has been advocated as a possible mechanism leading to the evolution of dispersal polymorphisms. Here, we examine the role of assortative mating for the evolution of trade-off-driven dispersal polymorphisms by modeling univoltine insect species in a metapopulation. We show that assortative mating does not favor the evolution of polymorphisms. On the contrary, assortative mating favors the evolution of an intermediate dispersal type and a uni-modal distribution of traits within populations. As an alternative, mechanism dominance may explain the occurrence of two discrete morphs.
多态扩散策略在许多植物和动物物种中都有发现。一个重要的问题是,这种多态性背后的遗传变异是如何维持的。人们讨论了许多机制,包括亲缘竞争或频率依赖选择。在同域物种形成事件的背景下,通常假设遗传和表型变异是通过交配的选择性来保存的。因此,最近有人认为这是导致扩散多态性进化的一种可能机制。在这里,我们通过对一个集合种群中的单世代昆虫物种进行建模,来检验交配的选择性对权衡驱动的扩散多态性进化的作用。我们表明,交配的选择性不利于多态性的进化。相反,交配的选择性有利于中间扩散类型和种群内性状的单峰分布的进化。作为替代方案,机制优势可能解释了两种离散形态的出现。