Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208-0001, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;53(3):243-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02452.x. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
Reading disability (RD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are comorbid and genetically correlated, especially the inattentive dimension of ADHD (ADHD-I). However, previous research indicates that RD and ADHD enter into opposite gene by environment (G × E) interactions.
This study used behavioral genetic methods to replicate these opposite G × E interactions in a sample of same-sex monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs from the Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center (CLDRC; DeFries et al., 1997) and to test a genetic hypothesis for why these opposite interactions occur.
We replicated opposite G × E interactions for RD (bioecological) and ADHD-I (diathesis-stress) with parental education in the same sample of participants. The genetic hypothesis for this opposite pattern of interactions is that only genes specific to each disorder enter into these opposite interactions, not the shared genes underlying their comorbidity. To test this hypothesis, we used single models with an exploratory three-way interaction, in which the G × E interactions for each disorder were moderated by comorbidity. Neither three-way interaction was significant. The heritability of RD did not vary as a function of parental education and ADHD-I. Similarly, the heritability of ADHD-I did not vary as a function of parental education and RD.
We documented opposite G × E interactions in RD and ADHD-I in the same overall twin sample, but the explanation for this apparent paradox remains unclear. Examining specific genes and more specific environmental factors may help resolve the paradox.
阅读障碍(RD)和注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是共病且具有遗传相关性的,尤其是 ADHD 的注意力不集中维度(ADHD-I)。然而,先前的研究表明 RD 和 ADHD 通过基因与环境的相互作用(G×E)进入相反的方向。
本研究使用行为遗传学方法,在科罗拉多学习障碍研究中心(CLDRC;DeFries 等人,1997)的同性别单卵双生子和双卵双生子双胞胎样本中复制这些相反的 G×E 相互作用,并检验为什么会发生这些相反的相互作用的遗传假设。
我们在同一组参与者中复制了 RD(生物生态学)和 ADHD-I(素质-压力)与父母教育的相反 G×E 相互作用。对于这种相反的相互作用模式的遗传假设是,只有与每种疾病特异性相关的基因进入这些相反的相互作用,而不是导致其共病的共享基因。为了检验这一假设,我们使用了具有探索性三向相互作用的单模型,其中每种疾病的 G×E 相互作用都受到共病的调节。这两个三向相互作用都不显著。RD 的遗传度不受父母教育的影响,而 ADHD-I 的遗传度也不受父母教育和 RD 的影响。
我们在同一总体双胞胎样本中记录了 RD 和 ADHD-I 的相反 G×E 相互作用,但对于这种明显的悖论的解释仍然不清楚。检查特定的基因和更具体的环境因素可能有助于解决这个悖论。