• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[以微菌落形态作为鉴别化脓性链球菌和B族链球菌时识别细菌的标准]

[The morphology of microcolonies as a criterion for recognizing bacteria in the differentiation of Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus group B].

作者信息

Khadzhiev S, Khadzhieva N

出版信息

Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 1990 Feb(2):10-3.

PMID:2188465
Abstract

The authors studied the diagnostic importance of the morphology of microcolonies of S. pyogenes and group B streptococci in comparison with the currently used tests for the differentiation of these two species: the bacitracin test, the hydrolysis of sodium hippurate and the CAMP test. The standard tests proved to be positive in 94-97% and microcolonies had typical morphology in 86-95.7%. The statistical indices of the diagnostic effectiveness of differential tests varied within 93.8-98.9%. The diagnostic value of the study of the morphology of colonies was characterized by the following data: the sensitivity and prognostic negative value of the study were 95% for S. pyogenes and 86-89% for group B streptococci, while its specificity and prognostic positive value were 100% due to the absence of false positive results.

摘要

作者研究了化脓性链球菌和B组链球菌微菌落形态的诊断重要性,并与目前用于区分这两种菌的试验进行了比较:杆菌肽试验、马尿酸钠水解试验和CAMP试验。标准试验的阳性率为94%-97%,微菌落具有典型形态的比例为86%-95.7%。鉴别试验诊断有效性的统计指标在93.8%-98.9%之间。菌落形态研究的诊断价值由以下数据表征:化脓性链球菌的研究敏感性和预后阴性值为95%,B组链球菌为86%-89%,而由于没有假阳性结果,其特异性和预后阳性值为100%。

相似文献

1
[The morphology of microcolonies as a criterion for recognizing bacteria in the differentiation of Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus group B].[以微菌落形态作为鉴别化脓性链球菌和B族链球菌时识别细菌的标准]
Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 1990 Feb(2):10-3.
2
Identification of streptococci in a medical laboratory.医学实验室中链球菌的鉴定。
J Appl Bacteriol. 1984 Aug;57(1):1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1984.tb02351.x.
3
A review of laboratory methods for identification of group B streptococci (Streptococcus agalactiae).B族链球菌(无乳链球菌)鉴定实验室方法综述。
Am J Med Technol. 1979 Mar;45(3):199-204.
4
Clinical trial comparing bacitracin with Strep-A-Chek for accuracy and turnaround time in the presumptive identification of Streptococcus pyogenes.一项比较杆菌肽与链球菌A检测法在化脓性链球菌初步鉴定中的准确性和周转时间的临床试验。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Sep;24(3):431-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.3.431-434.1986.
5
Presumptive identification of streptococci with a new test system.使用一种新的检测系统对链球菌进行初步鉴定。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jun;15(6):987-90. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.6.987-990.1982.
6
Rapid slide agglutination test for Lancefield grouping of streptococci.用于链球菌兰斯菲尔德分组的快速玻片凝集试验。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1979 Aug;103(9):456-8.
7
[Problems with identification of beta-hemolytic streptococcus resistant to bacitracin isolated from patients with pharyngitis].[从咽炎患者中分离出的对杆菌肽耐药的β-溶血性链球菌的鉴定问题]
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2012;64(1):1-10.
8
Differential diagnosis between Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria Monocytogenes in the clinical laboratory.
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1977 May-Jun;7(3):269-76.
9
Optimal methods for the isolation of groups A, B, C and G streptococci.
J Laryngol Otol. 1981 Apr;95(4):377-84. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100090848.
10
Evaluation of rapid methods of identifying group B streptococci.B族链球菌快速鉴定方法的评估
J Clin Pathol. 1980 Mar;33(3):302-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.33.3.302.