Suppr超能文献

探索和靶向由扫视适应分离的扫视。

Exploring and targeting saccades dissociated by saccadic adaptation.

机构信息

Université Paris Descartes, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Laboratoire de Psychologie et Neuropsychologie Cognitives, 71 Avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92774 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2011 Sep 30;1415:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.07.029. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

Abstract

Saccadic adaptation maintains saccade accuracy and has been studied with targeting saccades, i.e. saccades that bring the gaze to a target, with the classical intra-saccadic step procedure in which the target systematically jumps to a new position during saccade execution. Post-saccadic visual feedback about the error between target position and the saccade landing position is crucial to establish and maintain adaptation. However, recent research focusing on two-saccade sequences has shown that exploring saccades, i.e. saccades that explore an object, resists this classical intra-saccadic step procedure but can be adapted by systematically changing the main parameter used for their coding: stimulus size. Here, we adapted an exploring saccade and a targeting saccade in two separate experiments, using the appropriate adaptation procedure, and we tested whether the adaptation induced on one saccade type transferred to the other. We showed that whereas classical targeting saccade adaptation does not transfer to exploring saccades, the reciprocal transfer (i.e., from exploring to targeting saccades) occurred when targeting saccades aimed for a spatially extended stimulus, but not when they aimed for an isolated target. These results show that, in addition to position errors, size errors can drive adaptation, and confirm that exploring vs. targeting a stimulus leads to two different motor planning modes.

摘要

扫视适应保持了扫视的准确性,已经通过目标扫视进行了研究,即扫视将目光引向目标,使用经典的内扫视步骤程序,在该程序中,目标在扫视执行过程中会系统地跳到新位置。在扫视结束后,关于目标位置和扫视着陆位置之间的误差的视觉反馈对于建立和维持适应至关重要。然而,最近专注于双扫视序列的研究表明,探索扫视,即探索物体的扫视,抵制了这种经典的内扫视步骤程序,但可以通过系统地改变用于编码的主要参数来适应:刺激大小。在这里,我们在两个单独的实验中适应了探索扫视和目标扫视,使用了适当的适应程序,并测试了一种扫视类型的适应是否会转移到另一种扫视类型上。我们表明,虽然经典的目标扫视适应不会转移到探索扫视,但当目标扫视针对空间扩展的刺激时,会发生相反的转移(即从探索扫视到目标扫视),而当目标扫视针对孤立的目标时,则不会发生转移。这些结果表明,除了位置误差外,大小误差也可以驱动适应,并证实了对刺激的探索与目标指向会导致两种不同的运动规划模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验