• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 Mallampati 分级为 3 级的麻醉成人中使用盲探插管装置进行经鼻插管:与 Macintosh 喉镜的比较。

Nasotracheal intubation using the Blind Intubation Device in anaesthetised adults with Mallampati class 3: a comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Nov;28(11):774-80. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328349a9f9.

DOI:10.1097/EJA.0b013e328349a9f9
PMID:21885980
Abstract

CONTEXT

We hypothesised that the Blind Intubation Device (BID) would be effective for nasotracheal intubation (NTI) in anaesthetised adults with Mallampati class 3. We also hypothesised that BID may cause less haemodynamic changes due to the avoidance of direct stimulation induced by the Macintosh blade.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of the BID with the Macintosh laryngoscope for NTI in anaesthetised adults with Mallampati class 3.

DESIGN

A prospective randomised controlled study.

SETTING

Operation unit in a University Hospital in Shanghai. Period of the study was from September to November 2010.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Mallampati class 3 adults requiring NTI for elective oral and maxillofacial surgery were randomly assigned to a BID group (n = 25) or a Macintosh laryngoscope group (ML group) (n = 25).

INTERVENTION

After anaesthesia induction, patients were intubated by a single anaesthesiologist experienced in using both devices.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at specific time points. NTI duration and success rate was compared. Epistaxis-associated and NTI-associated postoperative complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline values, there was a significant increase in MAP in both the BID and ML groups which persisted significantly longer in the ML group. The BID group showed a significantly attenuated MAP value within 30-60 s. The difference between the maximum MAP and the post-induction value was significantly greater in the ML group than in the BID group (64.4 ± 16.1 vs. 45.9 ± 16.1 mmHg, P = 0.0003). Compared with baseline values, there was a significant increase in HR in both groups which persisted longer in the ML group. There was a significantly higher first attempt success rate in the BID group compared with the ML group (100 vs. 76%, respectively, P = 0.022). The NTI duration was 36 s [interquartile range (IQR) 32-40] in the BID group and 33 s (IQR 25.5-41.5) in the ML group. Epistaxis during NTI was less frequent and less severe in the BID group (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

In adults with Mallampati class 3, NTI using the BID caused an attenuated haemodynamic response and showed a higher success rate on the first attempt without increasing adverse events. The BID is an effective alternative to the Macintosh laryngoscope for NTI in anaesthetised adults with Mallampati class 3.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT 01170455.

摘要

背景

我们假设盲探插管器(BID)在 Mallampati 分级 3 的全麻患者行经鼻气管插管(NTI)时是有效的。我们还假设 BID 可能会引起较少的血流动力学变化,因为它避免了 Macintosh 叶片直接刺激引起的变化。

目的

本研究旨在比较 BID 与 Macintosh 喉镜在 Mallampati 分级 3 的全麻患者行 NTI 中的有效性。

设计

前瞻性随机对照研究。

地点

上海某大学医院的手术单元。研究期间为 2010 年 9 月至 11 月。

患者或其他参与者

需要行择期口腔颌面手术的 Mallampati 分级 3 成人,随机分为 BID 组(n = 25)或 Macintosh 喉镜组(ML 组)(n = 25)。

干预

麻醉诱导后,由一位经验丰富的麻醉师使用两种设备进行插管。

主要观察指标

记录特定时间点的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)。比较 NTI 持续时间和成功率。评估与插管相关的和术后并发症。

结果

与基线值相比,BID 和 ML 组的 MAP 均显著升高,且 ML 组的 MAP 升高持续时间明显更长。BID 组在 30-60 秒内 MAP 值明显降低。ML 组最大 MAP 与诱导后值之间的差值明显大于 BID 组(64.4 ± 16.1 与 45.9 ± 16.1 mmHg,P = 0.0003)。与基线值相比,两组的 HR 均显著升高,且 ML 组的 HR 升高持续时间更长。BID 组首次尝试成功率明显高于 ML 组(100%比 76%,P = 0.022)。BID 组的 NTI 持续时间为 36 秒(IQR 32-40),ML 组为 33 秒(IQR 25.5-41.5)。BID 组插管时鼻出血的频率和严重程度较低(P = 0.031)。

结论

在 Mallampati 分级 3 的成人中,使用 BID 行 NTI 可引起血流动力学反应减弱,首次尝试成功率较高,且不增加不良事件。BID 是 Mallampati 分级 3 的全麻患者行 NTI 的一种有效的 Macintosh 喉镜替代方法。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT 01170455。

相似文献

1
Nasotracheal intubation using the Blind Intubation Device in anaesthetised adults with Mallampati class 3: a comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope.在 Mallampati 分级为 3 级的麻醉成人中使用盲探插管装置进行经鼻插管:与 Macintosh 喉镜的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Nov;28(11):774-80. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328349a9f9.
2
A comparison of lighted stylet (Surch-Lite) and direct laryngoscopic intubation in patients with high Mallampati scores.高马兰帕蒂评分患者中光棒(Surch-Lite)与直接喉镜插管的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Apr;108(4):1215-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181994fba.
3
Circulatory responses to nasotracheal intubation: comparison of GlideScope videolaryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope.对经鼻气管插管的循环反应:GlideScope视频喉镜与麦金托什直接喉镜的比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Jul 20;121(14):1290-6.
4
[Comparison of cardiovascular responses between orotracheal and nasotracheal intubation with the aid of GlideScope video laryngoscope].[借助GlideScope视频喉镜进行经口气管插管与经鼻气管插管时心血管反应的比较]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Jul;20(7):405-8.
5
[Comparison of hemodynamic responses to nasotracheal intubations with Glide Scope video-laryngoscope, Macintosh direct laryngoscope, and fiberoptic bronchoscope].[使用Glide Scope视频喉镜、麦金托什直接喉镜和纤维支气管镜进行鼻气管插管时血流动力学反应的比较]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2007 Feb;29(1):117-23.
6
A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: A randomised, controlled clinical trial.在常规气道管理中使用Airtraq喉镜与Macintosh喉镜进行气管插管的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
Anaesthesia. 2006 Nov;61(11):1093-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04819.x.
7
Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope.使用GlideScope视频喉镜和Macintosh直接喉镜进行经口气管插管时血流动力学反应的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2007 Jun;19(4):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.11.004.
8
Comparison of the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation: a randomised clinical trial.经口双腔管插管中 AirTraq 与 Macintosh 喉镜的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Apr;30(4):180-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835fe574.
9
A comparison of the video laryngoscopes with Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.视频喉镜与麦金托什喉镜用于鼻气管插管的比较。
Asian J Anesthesiol. 2017 Mar;55(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aja.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
10
Indirect versus direct laryngoscopy for routine nasotracheal intubation.间接喉镜与直接喉镜用于常规经鼻气管插管。
J Clin Anesth. 2011 Jun;23(4):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.10.003.