Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Dec;25(12):714-20. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318212f82b.
To evaluate the outcomes of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with a cephalomedullary device.
Retrospective study.
Level I trauma center.
Between 2002 and 2008, 18 patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures were treated at our Level I trauma center with a cephalomedullary nail. There were 12 males and six females. Six patients were younger than 60 years of age with a mean age of 63 years (range, 40-88 years). Thirteen fractures were midcervical (Orthopaedic Trauma Association [OTA] 31-B2.2 and B2.3), and five fractures were subcapital (OTA 31-B3). Patients with basicervical fractures (OTA 31-B2.1) and nondisplaced subcapital fractures (OTA 31-B1) were excluded.
All patients underwent cephalomedullary nail fixation of their femoral neck fractures under the supervision of fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons.
Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for fracture reduction quality. Clinical follow-up was available on 13 patients with a minimum of 12 months (range, 12-25 months). A radiographic and chart review was done to identify complications and outcomes.
Seven of eight fractures that healed were anatomically reduced. No failures occurred in the six patients younger than 60 years. Fixation failed in five of 13 fractures (38.4%) with varus collapse as the typical failure mode. The mean time to failure in these cases was 3.8 months (range, 1-7 months). Overall, the failure rate for the subcapital fractures was 100% (three of three) and for midcervical 20% (two of 10) with all failures being in patients older than 60 years (71.4%). Osteonecrosis without fixation failure or cutout occurred in one case.
Cephalomedullary nail fixation of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures demonstrated mixed results. For younger patients with midcervical fractures that were well reduced, the fixation performed well. Displaced subcapital fractures in patients older than 60 years demonstrated a 100% failure rate. As a result, we cannot advocate cephalomedullary fixation for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in patients older than 60 years, although in younger patients, these implants may provide an alternative to side-plate based fixation devices.
评估使用股骨近端髓内钉治疗移位型股骨颈囊内骨折的疗效。
回顾性研究。
一级创伤中心。
2002 年至 2008 年,我院一级创伤中心采用股骨近端髓内钉治疗 18 例移位型股骨颈囊内骨折患者,其中男 12 例,女 6 例。6 例患者年龄小于 60 岁,平均年龄 63 岁(范围 40-88 岁)。13 例为中段股骨颈骨折(创伤骨科协会 31-B2.2 和 B2.3 型),5 例为基底骨折(31-B3 型)。排除基底骨折(31-B2.1 型)和无移位基底骨折(31-B1 型)患者。
所有患者均在 fellowship 培训的骨科创伤外科医生的监督下接受股骨颈骨折的近端髓内钉固定。
术后影像学评估骨折复位质量。对 13 例患者进行了至少 12 个月(范围 12-25 个月)的临床随访。对影像学和图表进行回顾,以确定并发症和结果。
8 例愈合的骨折中 7 例解剖复位。60 岁以下的 6 例患者中无固定失败。13 例固定失败 5 例(38.4%),典型失败模式为内翻塌陷。这些病例的平均失败时间为 3.8 个月(范围 1-7 个月)。总的来说,基底骨折的失败率为 100%(3 例),中段骨折为 20%(10 例),所有失败均发生在 60 岁以上的患者(71.4%)。在 1 例病例中,发生了无固定失败或切出的骨坏死。
股骨近端髓内钉治疗移位型股骨颈囊内骨折的疗效不一。对于颈中段骨折且复位良好的年轻患者,固定效果良好。60 岁以上患者的移位基底骨折的失败率为 100%。因此,尽管在年轻患者中,这些植入物可能是侧板固定装置的替代物,但我们不能主张在 60 岁以上的患者中使用股骨近端髓内钉治疗移位型股骨颈囊内骨折。