• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾乳腺癌护理按绩效付费计划的效果。

Effect of the Pay-for-Performance Program for Breast Cancer Care in Taiwan.

机构信息

National Taiwan University Hospital; and College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2011 May;7(3 Suppl):e8s-e15s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000314.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.2011.000314
PMID:21886513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3092463/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of the nationwide pay-for-performance (P4P) program for breast cancer care (BC-P4P) in Taiwan on care quality, patient survival, and recurrence.

STUDY DESIGN

A population-based observational study with cross-sectional design.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of population-based cancer registration and claims data was used in this study. A total of 4,528 patients with stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed in 2002 or 2003 who received curative surgery were observed until the end of 2008. This study applied multivariate linear regression to explore the association between BC-P4P enrollment and quality of care. Cox regression was applied to examine the effect of BC-P4P enrollment on 5-year recurrence and overall survival among patients with breast cancer.

RESULTS

After controlling for age, stage, type of surgery, and other factors, BC-P4P enrollees were found to have received better quality care than nonenrollees (P = .001). Cox regression models also indicated that after controlling for patient characteristics, quality of care was related to better 5-year overall survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.212; P = .001) and recurrence (OR, 0.289; P < .001). Even when controlled by quality of care provided to patients and its interaction with status of BC-P4P enrollment, BC-P4P enrollment remained statistically significant regarding 5-year overall survival (OR, 0.167; P < .001) and recurrence (OR, 0.370; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with breast cancer enrolled in the BC-P4P program received better quality care and had better outcome than nonenrolled patients. Evidence from this study indicates that financial incentives in the payment design had a positive impact on outcome of breast cancer care.

摘要

目的

评估台湾全国乳腺癌保健按绩效付费(BC-P4P)计划对护理质量、患者生存和复发的影响。

研究设计

这是一项基于人群的观察性研究,采用横断面设计。

方法

本研究使用基于人群的癌症登记和索赔数据进行回顾性分析。共观察了 4528 名 2002 年或 2003 年诊断为 I 期或 II 期乳腺癌且接受根治性手术的患者,直至 2008 年底。本研究应用多元线性回归探讨 BC-P4P 参与与护理质量的关系。Cox 回归用于检验 BC-P4P 参与对乳腺癌患者 5 年复发和总生存的影响。

结果

在控制年龄、分期、手术类型和其他因素后,发现 BC-P4P 参与者接受的护理质量优于非参与者(P =.001)。Cox 回归模型还表明,在控制患者特征后,护理质量与更好的 5 年总生存(比值比 [OR],0.212;P =.001)和复发(OR,0.289;P <.001)相关。即使控制了患者接受的护理质量及其与 BC-P4P 参与状况的相互作用,BC-P4P 参与在 5 年总生存(OR,0.167;P <.001)和复发(OR,0.370;P =.002)方面仍然具有统计学意义。

结论

参加 BC-P4P 计划的乳腺癌患者接受的护理质量更好,结局优于未参加的患者。本研究结果表明,支付设计中的财务激励对乳腺癌护理结局产生了积极影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of the Pay-for-Performance Program for Breast Cancer Care in Taiwan.台湾乳腺癌护理按绩效付费计划的效果。
J Oncol Pract. 2011 May;7(3 Suppl):e8s-e15s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000314.
2
Effect of the pay-for-performance program for breast cancer care in Taiwan.台湾乳腺癌护理按绩效付费计划的效果。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 May 1;17(5 Spec No):e203-11.
3
Effectiveness of Nationwide COPD Pay-for-Performance Program on COPD Exacerbations in Taiwan.台湾全国 COPD 按绩效付费计划对 COPD 加重的效果。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Oct 18;16:2869-2881. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S329454. eCollection 2021.
4
Using financial incentives to improve the care of tuberculosis patients.利用经济激励措施改善结核病患者的护理。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jan 1;21(1):e35-42.
5
Factors related to continuing care and interruption of P4P program participation in patients with diabetes.与糖尿病患者持续护理及参与按绩效付费计划中断相关的因素。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Jan 1;22(1):e18-30.
6
A diabetes pay-for-performance program and the competing causes of death among cancer survivors with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan.台湾一项糖尿病按绩效付费计划以及2型糖尿病癌症幸存者的竞争性死因
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Aug 1;29(4):512-520. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx057.
7
Patient assessment of diabetes care in a pay-for-performance program.按绩效付费项目中患者对糖尿病护理的评估。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Apr;28(2):183-90. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv120. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
8
Effects of individual and neighborhood social risks on diabetes pay-for-performance program under a single-payer health system.个体和社区社会风险对单一支付方健康体系下糖尿病按绩效付费计划的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jun;326:115930. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115930. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
9
The association between participation in a pay-for-performance program and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based cohort study.台湾2型糖尿病患者参与绩效薪酬计划与大血管并发症之间的关联:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。
Prev Med. 2016 Apr;85:53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.12.013. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
10
Participation and Outcomes among Disabled and Non-Disabled People in the Diabetes Pay-for-Performance Program.糖尿病绩效付费项目中残疾人和非残疾人的参与情况及结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;11(20):2742. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202742.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance-based payment systems for general practitioners and specialists in selected countries: a comparative study.部分国家全科医生和专科医生基于绩效的支付系统:一项比较研究。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2025 May 31;66(1):E114-E125. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2025.66.1.3511. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Does asthma pay-for-performance program really improve the quality of asthma care: a nationwide retrospective cohort analysis in Taiwan.哮喘按绩效付费项目真的能提高哮喘护理质量吗:台湾一项全国性回顾性队列分析
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03673-2.
3
Mathematical Modeling for the Assessment of Public Policies in the Cancer Health-Care System Implemented for the Colombian Case.针对哥伦比亚案例实施的癌症医疗保健系统公共政策评估的数学建模
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 11;20(18):6740. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186740.
4
Exploring the challenges and features of implementing performance-based payment plan in hospitals: a protocol for a systematic review.探讨医院实施基于绩效的支付计划的挑战和特点:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 17;10(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01657-x.
5
Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis.医疗保健领域绩效薪酬计划有效性的证据是否正在改变?来自元回归分析的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 24;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06118-8.
6
Impact of oncologist payment method on health care outcomes, costs, quality: a rapid review.肿瘤学家支付方式对医疗保健结果、成本和质量的影响:快速综述
Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 21;5(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0341-2.
7
Female breast cancer survival in Qidong, China, 1972-2011: a population-based study.1972 - 2011年中国启东女性乳腺癌生存率:一项基于人群的研究
BMC Cancer. 2014 May 6;14:318. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-318.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.系统评价:医疗保健中绩效付费的效果、设计选择和背景。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 23;10:247. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-247.
2
Using the lessons of behavioral economics to design more effective pay-for-performance programs.利用行为经济学的经验教训来设计更有效的按绩效付费计划。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jul;16(7):497-503.
3
The impact of removing financial incentives from clinical quality indicators: longitudinal analysis of four Kaiser Permanente indicators.取消临床质量指标财务激励的影响:四项 Kaiser Permanente 指标的纵向分析。
BMJ. 2010 May 11;340:c1898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1898.
4
The effects of pay-for-performance on tuberculosis treatment in Taiwan.按效付费对台湾结核病治疗的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Jul;25(4):334-41. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq006. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
5
A pay-for-performance program for diabetes care in Taiwan: a preliminary assessment.台湾糖尿病医疗照护绩效付费方案:初步评估。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan;16(1):65-9.
6
Making the 'pay' matter in pay-for-performance: implications for payment strategies.绩效薪酬中“薪酬”的重要性:对支付策略的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):1498-508. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1498.
7
Financial incentives for quality in breast cancer care.乳腺癌护理质量的经济激励措施。
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Jul;14(7):457-66.
8
Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives.通过对医疗服务提供者评估与反馈以及医疗服务提供者激励措施的系统评价,来增加医疗服务提供者对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的推荐及实施的干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.008.
9
Pay-for-performance in New Zealand primary health care.新西兰初级卫生保健中的绩效薪酬制。
J Health Organ Manag. 2008;22(1):36-47. doi: 10.1108/14777260810862399.
10
Organization-based performance measures of cancer care quality: core measure development for breast cancer in Taiwan.基于机构的癌症护理质量绩效指标:台湾地区乳腺癌核心指标的制定
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Jan;17(1):5-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00796.x.