• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨医院实施基于绩效的支付计划的挑战和特点:系统评价方案。

Exploring the challenges and features of implementing performance-based payment plan in hospitals: a protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Student Research Committee (SRC), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management (IceHM), Department of Health Service Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, University Rd, Golbad, EAZN, Tabriz, 5165665811, Iran.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 17;10(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01657-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-021-01657-x
PMID:33863372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8052724/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implementing performance-based payment (PBP) plan has led to developing a number of significant potentialities such as performance improvement and effectiveness, quality improvement of provided services, and decline in health system expenditure in hospitals. Despite the fact that PBP plan has a variety of potential advantages, its implementation still may face some challenges. Hence, it seems crucial to identify these barriers and challenges in order to devise some strategies and interventions to pave the way for better implementation of PBP in hospitals. The aim of this proposed protocol is to identify, summarize, and synthesize the existing evidence by undertaking a systematic review to explore the challenges, barriers, and features of implementing PBP in hospitals.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

An inclusive search of the literature will be conducted in seven international and national databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, Magiran, Scientific Information Database (SID), and Barakat knowledge network system (BKNS). The search will be limited to the studies published in English or Persian language. Database search will be supplemented by hand-search of citation, reference lists, and grey literature sources. Based on the pre-established criteria in all steps of the review, two researchers will independently screen all of the retrieved studies. Any discrepancies will be resolved through a discussion between two researchers. In cases where consensus is not reached, it will be referred to a third researcher. The methodological quality of all the included studies will be appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The data will be extracted by means of using a data extraction form, which will be developed and piloted by the research team. The findings will be synthesized through directed content analysis method.

DISCUSSION

With the growth and development of payment systems all over the world, it is expected that recognizing the challenges of implementing a PBP plan in hospitals will be useful in developing and designing strategies to better implement this plan.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42020152569.

摘要

背景

实施基于绩效的支付(PBP)计划带来了许多显著的潜力,如提高绩效和效果、提高提供服务的质量以及降低医院的卫生系统支出。尽管 PBP 计划具有多种潜在优势,但在实施过程中仍可能面临一些挑战。因此,识别这些障碍和挑战似乎至关重要,以便制定一些策略和干预措施,为医院更好地实施 PBP 铺平道路。本研究旨在通过系统评价,确定、总结和综合现有证据,以探讨医院实施 PBP 的挑战、障碍和特点。

方法和分析

将在包括 PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science、Magiran、科学信息数据库(SID)和 Barakat 知识网络系统(BKNS)在内的七个国际和国家数据库中进行全面的文献搜索。搜索将仅限于以英文或波斯语发表的研究。将通过对引文、参考文献列表和灰色文献来源的手动搜索来补充数据库搜索。根据审查的所有步骤中预先设定的标准,两名研究人员将独立筛选所有检索到的研究。任何差异都将通过两名研究人员之间的讨论来解决。如果无法达成共识,则将提交给第三名研究人员。将使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估所有纳入研究的方法学质量。将通过使用由研究团队开发和试点的的数据提取表来提取数据。将通过定向内容分析方法综合研究结果。

讨论

随着全球支付系统的增长和发展,预计识别实施医院 PBP 计划的挑战将有助于制定和设计更好地实施该计划的策略。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42020152569。

相似文献

1
Exploring the challenges and features of implementing performance-based payment plan in hospitals: a protocol for a systematic review.探讨医院实施基于绩效的支付计划的挑战和特点:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 17;10(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01657-x.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review.减少养老院的非计划性住院:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(18):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KLPW6338.
7
Health economic evaluation in orthotics and prosthetics: a systematic review protocol.矫形器和假肢中的健康经济评价:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 27;8(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1066-9.
8
Exploring the challenges of implementing e-health: a protocol for an update of a systematic review of reviews.探索实施电子健康的挑战:一项对综述的系统评价进行更新的方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006773.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol.促进工作场所心理健康干预措施实施的证据:系统范围界定综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 28;10(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-sectional survey study of primary care clinics on evidence-based colorectal cancer screening intervention use.基于证据的结直肠癌筛查干预使用的基层医疗诊所横断面调查研究。
J Rural Health. 2022 Sep;38(4):845-854. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12631. Epub 2021 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries.按绩效付费以改善中低收入国家卫生干预措施的提供。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 5;5(5):CD007899. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007899.pub3.
2
Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews.人群、干预措施、对照、结局和研究(PICOS)设计作为在系统评价中制定纳入标准的框架。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Jun;37(6):387. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209567. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
3
How to Report Systematic Review Studies; A Critical Review of Some Methodological Issues and Recommendations to Consider When Conducting These Studies.如何报告系统评价研究;对一些方法学问题的批判性综述以及开展这些研究时需考虑的建议。
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Oct;7(4):429-430. doi: 10.29252/beat-070416.
4
Developing and validating an instrument to assess non-hospital health centers' preparedness to provide initial emergency care: a study protocol.制定并验证一种评估非医院健康中心提供初步急救能力的工具:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e026651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026651.
5
Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).改进一种用于评估定性、定量和混合方法研究质量的工具——混合方法评估工具(MMAT)的实用性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):459-467. doi: 10.1111/jep.12884. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Implementation Processes and Pay for Performance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.医疗保健中的实施过程与绩效薪酬:系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):61-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3567-0.
7
Leaders' experiences and perceptions implementing activity-based funding and pay-for-performance hospital funding models: A systematic review.领导者实施基于活动的资金投入和绩效付费医院资金模式的经验与认知:一项系统综述。
Health Policy. 2015 Aug;119(8):1096-110. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 12.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
9
Study on situational influences perceived in nursing discipline on health promotion: a qualitative study.护理学科中对健康促进的情境影响研究:一项定性研究。
ISRN Nurs. 2013 Sep 2;2013:218034. doi: 10.1155/2013/218034. eCollection 2013.
10
Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews.绩效薪酬对医疗保健的影响:系统评价的系统评价。
Health Policy. 2013 May;110(2-3):115-30. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Feb 4.