Suppr超能文献

所有前斜位骨折方向真的都是II型和 Rostral 浅III型齿状突骨折前路螺钉固定的禁忌证吗?

Is All Anterior Oblique Fracture Orientation Really a Contraindication to Anterior Screw Fixation of Type II and Rostral Shallow Type III Odontoid Fractures?

作者信息

Cho Dae-Chul, Sung Joo-Kyung

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2011 Jun;49(6):345-50. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2011.49.6.345. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It is debatable whether an anterior oblique fracture orientation is really a contraindication to anterior odontoid screw fixation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of anterior odontoid screw fixation of type II and rostral shallow type III fracture with an anterior oblique fracture orientation.

METHODS

The authors evaluated 16 patients with type II and rostral shallow type III odontoid fracture with an anterior oblique fracture orientation. Of these 16 patients, 8 (group 1) were treated by anterior odontoid screw fixation, and 8 (group 2) by a posterior C1-2 arthrodesis.

RESULTS

Of the 8 patients in group 1, seven patients achieved solid bone fusion (87.5%), and one experienced screw back-out of the C-2 body two months after anterior screw fixation. All patients treated by posterior C1-C2 fusion in group 2 achieved successful bone fusion. Mean fracture displacements and fracture gaps were not significantly different in two groups. (p=0.075 and 0.782). However, mean fracture orientation angles were 15.3±3.2 degrees in group 1, and 28.6+8.1 degrees in group 2 (p=0.002), and mean fragment angulations were 3.2±2.1 degrees in group 1, and 14.8±6.7 degrees in group 2 (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Even when the fracture lines of type II and rostral shallow type III fractures are oriented in an anterior oblique direction, anterior odontoid screw fixation can be feasible in carefully selected patients with a relatively small fracture orientation angle and relatively small fragment angulation.

摘要

目的

前路斜形骨折方向是否真的是前路齿状突螺钉固定的禁忌证,这一点存在争议。本研究的目的是探讨前路齿状突螺钉固定治疗Ⅱ型和喙突浅Ⅲ型前路斜形骨折的可行性。

方法

作者评估了16例具有前路斜形骨折方向的Ⅱ型和喙突浅Ⅲ型齿状突骨折患者。在这16例患者中,8例(第1组)采用前路齿状突螺钉固定治疗,8例(第2组)采用后路C1-2关节融合术治疗。

结果

第1组的8例患者中,7例实现了牢固的骨融合(87.5%),1例在前路螺钉固定术后两个月出现螺钉从C-2椎体退出。第2组所有接受后路C1-C2融合术治疗的患者均成功实现骨融合。两组的平均骨折移位和骨折间隙无显著差异(p = 0.075和0.782)。然而,第1组的平均骨折方向角度为15.3±3.2度,第2组为28.6 + 8.1度(p = 0.002),第1组的平均骨折块成角为3.2±2.1度,第2组为14.8±6.7度(p = 0.001)。

结论

即使Ⅱ型和喙突浅Ⅲ型骨折的骨折线呈前路斜向,对于骨折方向角度相对较小且骨折块成角相对较小的精心挑选的患者,前路齿状突螺钉固定仍可能是可行的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Anterior fixation of odontoid fractures in an elderly population.老年人寰椎骨折的前路固定。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jan;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.SPINE08589.
7
Halo vest immobilization in the elderly: a death sentence?老年患者的头环背心固定术:是死刑判决吗?
J Trauma. 2005 Aug;59(2):350-6; discussion 356-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000174671.07664.7c.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验